A new approach for Bayesian model averaging

被引:0
|
作者
XiangJun Tian
ZhengHui Xie
AiHui Wang
XiaoChun Yang
机构
[1] Chinese Academy of Sciences,The International Center for Climate and Environment Sciences, Institute of Atmospheric Physics
[2] Chinese Academy of Sciences,State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics
[3] Chinese Academy of Sciences,Nansen
[4] Meterological Bureau of Xi’an City,Zhu International Research Centre, Institute of Atmospheric Physics
来源
关键词
Bayesian model averaging; multi-model ensemble forecasts; BMA-BFGS; limited memory quasi-Newtonian algorithm; land surface models; soil moisture;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Bayesian model averaging (BMA) is a recently proposed statistical method for calibrating forecast ensembles from numerical weather models. However, successful implementation of BMA requires accurate estimates of the weights and variances of the individual competing models in the ensemble. Two methods, namely the Expectation-Maximization (EM) and the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms, are widely used for BMA model training. Both methods have their own respective strengths and weaknesses. In this paper, we first modify the BMA log-likelihood function with the aim of removing the additional limitation that requires that the BMA weights add to one, and then use a limited memory quasi-Newtonian algorithm for solving the nonlinear optimization problem, thereby formulating a new approach for BMA (referred to as BMA-BFGS). Several groups of multi-model soil moisture simulation experiments from three land surface models show that the performance of BMA-BFGS is similar to the MCMC method in terms of simulation accuracy, and that both are superior to the EM algorithm. On the other hand, the computational cost of the BMA-BFGS algorithm is substantially less than for MCMC and is almost equivalent to that for EM.
引用
收藏
页码:1336 / 1344
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Endogeneity and panel data in growth regressions: A Bayesian model averaging approach
    Leon-Gonzalez, Roberto
    Montolio, Daniel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MACROECONOMICS, 2015, 46 : 23 - 39
  • [32] Risk factors of coronary heart disease: a Bayesian model averaging approach
    Wang, DL
    Lertsithichai, P
    Nanchahal, K
    Yousufuddin, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2003, 30 (07) : 813 - 826
  • [33] Revisiting the growth effects of fiscal policy: A Bayesian model averaging approach
    Arin, K. Peren
    Braunfels, Elias
    Doppelhofer, Gernot
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MACROECONOMICS, 2019, 62
  • [34] Revisiting the link between growth and federalism: A Bayesian model averaging approach
    Asatryan, Zareh
    Feld, Lars P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2015, 43 (03) : 772 - 781
  • [35] A Bayesian model averaging approach to analyzing categorical data with nonignorable nonresponse
    Janicki, Ryan
    Malec, Donald
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2013, 57 (01) : 600 - 614
  • [36] Can Cattle Basis Forecasts Be Improved? A Bayesian Model Averaging Approach
    Payne, Nicholas D.
    Karali, Berna
    Dorfman, Jeffrey H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2019, 51 (02) : 249 - 266
  • [37] A Bayesian Model Averaging Approach to Gene-Environment Interaction in a GWAS
    Li, Dalin
    Conti, David V.
    [J]. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 34 (08) : 935 - 935
  • [38] Growth, convergence and public investment.: A Bayesian model averaging approach
    León-González, R
    Montolio, D
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2004, 36 (17) : 1925 - 1936
  • [39] Application of Bayesian Model Averaging Approach to Multimodel Ensemble Hydrologic Forecasting
    Liang, Zhongmin
    Wang, Dong
    Guo, Yan
    Zhang, Yu
    Dai, Rong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2013, 18 (11) : 1426 - 1436
  • [40] Forecasting seasonal time series data: a Bayesian model averaging approach
    Alexander Vosseler
    Enzo Weber
    [J]. Computational Statistics, 2018, 33 : 1733 - 1765