A computationally efficient approach to swimming monofin optimization

被引:0
|
作者
M. A. Luersen
R. Le Riche
D. Lemosse
O. Le Maître
机构
[1] DAMEC,LMR, Laboratoire de Mécanique de Rouen, INSA de Rouen
[2] Departamento de Mecânica,Laboratoire de Mécanique et d’Energétique d’Evry
[3] CEFET-PR,undefined
[4] Ecole des Mines de Saint Etienne,undefined
[5] Avenue de l’Université,undefined
[6] Université d’Evry Val d’Essonne,undefined
关键词
Monofin design; Swimming propulsion; Identification; Optimization;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Monofins provide swimmers with an efficient alternative to the standard pair of fins. For example, all short and long distance human swimming records have been established using monofins. Current monofin design is mostly empirical, so the objectives of this work are to analyze monofin propulsion through coupled fluid–structure simulation and to optimize its flexural stiffness distribution. The optimization process maximizes the propulsive power provided by the monofin with a constraint on the total expended power. To be able to carry out the optimization of the coupled fluid–structure system, which is numerically costly to evaluate, the following simplifications are proposed: (1) a 2-D unsteady, inviscid, and incompressible fluid flow is considered; (2) the swimmer is composed of linear articulated segments, whose kinematics is imposed and identified from experimental data; and (3) the monofin is represented by rigid bars linked by torsional springs. For various allowable swimmer powers, optimal 2-D stiffness distributions are obtained using the Globalized and Bounded Nelder–Mead algorithm. Finally, an identification procedure is described to translate the optimal 2-D stiffness distributions into 3-D thickness profiles for a given monofin planform shape.
引用
收藏
页码:488 / 496
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A computationally efficient nonparametric approach for changepoint detection
    Haynes, Kaylea
    Fearnhead, Paul
    Eckley, Idris A.
    STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 2017, 27 (05) : 1293 - 1305
  • [22] Computationally Efficient Dynamic Traffic Optimization of Railway Systems
    Vujanic, Robin
    Hill, Andrew J.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 23 (05) : 4706 - 4719
  • [23] Sliced Particle Swarm Optimization (SPSO); A Computationally Efficient Optimization Technique
    Garg, Harish
    Pattnaik, S. S.
    Devi, Swapna
    Bakwad, K. M.
    Panigrahi, B. K.
    Das, S. K.
    2009 WORLD CONGRESS ON NATURE & BIOLOGICALLY INSPIRED COMPUTING (NABIC 2009), 2009, : 61 - +
  • [24] Efficient Global Optimization for Solving Computationally Expensive Bilevel Optimization Problems
    Islam, Md Monjurul
    Singh, Hemant Kumar
    Ray, Tapabrata
    2018 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2018, : 181 - 188
  • [25] A Computationally Efficient Model of MEMS Stopper for Reliability Optimization
    Peng, Tianfang
    You, Zheng
    2021 28TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONICS, CIRCUITS, AND SYSTEMS (IEEE ICECS 2021), 2021,
  • [26] A nonexpansive operator for computationally efficient hierarchical convex optimization
    Yamagishi, Masao
    Yamada, Isao
    2015 ASIA-PACIFIC SIGNAL AND INFORMATION PROCESSING ASSOCIATION ANNUAL SUMMIT AND CONFERENCE (APSIPA), 2015, : 1100 - 1106
  • [27] Computationally efficient stochastic optimization using multiple realizations
    Bayer, P.
    Buerger, C. M.
    Finkel, M.
    ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2008, 31 (02) : 399 - 417
  • [28] Antenna Optimization With a Computationally Efficient Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm
    John, Matthias
    Ammann, Max J.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, 2009, 57 (01) : 260 - 263
  • [29] The Least Squares Method as a Tool for Assessment of the Stroke Parameters and Velocity in Monofin Swimming
    Rejman, Marek
    Szkudlarek, Pawel
    METHODS AND PROTOCOLS, 2025, 8 (01)
  • [30] A hybrid CPU-Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) approach for computationally efficient simulation-optimization
    Lau, Mai Chan
    Srinivasan, Rajagopalan
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 87 : 49 - 62