Estimation of Soil Erosion and Identification of Critical Areas for Soil Conservation Measures using RS and GIS-based Universal Soil Loss Equation

被引:5
|
作者
Machiwal D. [1 ]
Katara P. [2 ]
Mittal H.K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Bhuj, 370 105, Gujarat
[2] SWE Department, College of Technology and Engineering, MPUAT, Udaipur, 313 001, Rajasthan
关键词
Geographical information system; Remote sensing; Soil erosion; Ungauged catchment; Universal soil loss equation model;
D O I
10.1007/s40003-015-0157-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Present study aimed at estimating soil erosion potential and identification of critical areas for soil conservation measures in an ungauged catchment situated in Aravalli hills of Udaipur district, Rajasthan (India). Also, impact of rainfall on soil erosion is evaluated. The soil erosion is estimated for 10 year period (2001–2010) by Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) model using Geographical information system (GIS) and remote sensing techniques for every 12 m × 12 m area. Thematic maps of six USLE model parameters, i.e., rainfall erosivity (R-factor), soil erodibility (K-factor), slope length (L-factor), slope steepness (S-factor), crop and management (C-factor), and support practice (P-factor), were prepared in GIS platform. The R-factor ranged from 1,522.93 to 10,225.88 MJ mm ha−1 h−1 year−1 in the years 2006 and 2008, respectively, when the annual rainfall was 984.3 and 572.2 mm, and number of rainy days were 58 and 47, respectively. The K-factor was highest for fine loam soil covering 56 % area, while the lowest value was for coarse loamy sand in 22 % area. The lowest value of the L-factor (0.736) was in accordance with the high slopes nearby catchment boundary; whereas the highest value (0.832) was for almost zero slopes in 34 % area nearby waterbodies. Opposite to the L-factor, the S-factor values were high (>4) for the higher slopes nearby catchment boundary and the lowest values for the zero slopes. The C-factor value in 170.36 km2 or 48.91 % of the area is 0.1 while the value is zero for waterbodies and builtup lands. The P-factor value in 250.36 km2 or 71.87 % of the area is 0.8. The mean annual soil erosion in the major portion of the catchment (231.13 km2 or 66.38 %) exceeds 10 t ha−1 year−1 indicating high to very severe soil erosion conditions prevailing in the catchment. It is apparent that vast quantities of the soil are getting eroded from the catchment, and the annual rainfall amount and rainfall intensity have the profound effect on the soil erosion potential. This study emphasizes that USLE model coupled with GIS and remote sensing techniques are promising and cost-effective tools for mapping critical areas of soil erosion in ungauged catchments especially in developing countries. © 2015, NAAS (National Academy of Agricultural Sciences).
引用
下载
收藏
页码:183 / 195
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Soil erosion estimation and erosion risk area prioritization using GIS-based RUSLE model and identification of conservation strategies in Jejebe watershed, Southwestern Ethiopia
    Yonas Gebreslasie Hagos
    Tesfa Gebrie Andualem
    Mesenbet Yibeltal Sebhat
    Zelalem K. Bedaso
    Fitsum Tilahun Teshome
    Haimanote Kebede Bayabil
    Endalkachew Abebe Kebede
    Girum Getachew Demeke
    Addisalem Bitew Mitiku
    Workineh Tadesse Ayele
    Dinkisa Nagash Alamayo
    Ermias Alemu Demissie
    Mequanent Abathun Mengie
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2023, 195
  • [32] Soil erosion estimation and erosion risk area prioritization using GIS-based RUSLE model and identification of conservation strategies in Jejebe watershed, Southwestern Ethiopia
    Hagos, Yonas Gebreslasie
    Andualem, Tesfa Gebrie
    Sebhat, Mesenbet Yibeltal
    Bedaso, Zelalem K.
    Teshome, Fitsum Tilahun
    Bayabil, Haimanote Kebede
    Kebede, Endalkachew Abebe
    Demeke, Girum Getachew
    Mitiku, Addisalem Bitew
    Ayele, Workineh Tadesse
    Alamayo, Dinkisa Nagash
    Demissie, Ermias Alemu
    Mengie, Mequanent Abathun
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2023, 195 (12)
  • [33] Soil erosion risk in Korean watersheds, assessed using the revised universal soil loss equation
    Park, Soyoung
    Oh, Cheyoung
    Jeon, Seongwoo
    Jung, Huicheul
    Choi, Chuluong
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2011, 399 (3-4) : 263 - 273
  • [34] A review of soil erosion modeling in Nigeria using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation model
    Ezeh, Christopher Uche
    Igwe, Ogbonnaya
    Asare, Mensah Yaw
    Ndulue, Dominic C.
    Ayadiuno, Romanus U.
    Preko, Kwasi
    AGROSYSTEMS GEOSCIENCES & ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 7 (01)
  • [35] A Smartphone application to compute soil erosion based on the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE)
    Simonet, Daniel
    Ali, Tarig A.
    EMIRATES JOURNAL OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2021, 33 (09): : 711 - 717
  • [36] Assessing soil loss by water erosion in Jamni River Basin, Bundelkhand region, India, adopting universal soil loss equation using GIS
    Singh, Ram
    Phadke, V. S.
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2006, 90 (10): : 1431 - 1435
  • [37] SOIL-EROSION RESEARCH LEADING TO DEVELOPMENT OF THE UNIVERSAL SOIL LOSS EQUATION
    MEYER, LD
    SCIENCE AND EDUCATION ADMINISTRATION PUBLICATIONS, 1982, ARM (NW-26): : 1 - 16
  • [38] SOIL CONSERVATION PLANNING AT THE WATERSHED LEVEL USING THE UNIVERSAL SOIL LOSS EQUATION WITH GIS AND MICROCOMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES - A CASE-STUDY
    MELLEROWICZ, KT
    REES, HW
    CHOW, TL
    GHANEM, I
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 1994, 49 (02) : 194 - 200
  • [39] Identification of soil erosion areas and soil conservation in the Ci Lutung watershed using the RUSLE method
    Rivanda, R. A.
    Kusratmoko, E.
    Rustanto, A.
    FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES OF INDONESIAN SOCIETY FOR REMOTE SENSING: THE REVOLUTION OF EARTH OBSERVATION FOR A BETTER HUMAN LIFE, 2020, 500
  • [40] RUSLE and GIS-based assessment of soil erosion in the mountain areas of Beijing, China
    Zhang, Weiwei
    Li, Hong
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2015, 2015, 31 : 929 - 934