Integrated process of starch ethanol and cellulosic lactic acid for ethanol and lactic acid production

被引:0
|
作者
Yong Tang
Liwei Zhu
Weiming Zhang
Xinhui Shang
Jianxin Jiang
机构
[1] Beijing Forestry University,Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
[2] Nanjing Academy of Wild Plant,undefined
[3] Chunlei Industrial Group Company,undefined
来源
关键词
Ethanol; Lactic acid; Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation; Yeast; Integrated process;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The sequential production of bioethanol and lactic acid from starch materials and lignocellulosic materials was investigated as ethanol fermentation broth (EFB) can provide nutrients for lactic acid bacteria. A complete process was developed, and all major operations are discussed, including ethanol fermentation, broth treatment, lactic acid fermentation, and product separation. The effect of process parameters, including ethanol fermentation conditions, treatment methods, and the amount of EFB used in simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF), is investigated. Under the selected process conditions, the integrated process without additional chemical consumption provides a 1.08 acid/alcohol ratio (the broth containing 22.4 g/L ethanol and 47.6 g/L lactic acid), which corresponds to a polysaccharide utilization ratio of 86.9 %. Starch ethanol can thus promote cellulosic lactic acid by providing important nutrients for lactic acid bacteria, and in turn, cellulosic lactic acid could promote starch ethanol by improving the profit of the ethanol production process. Two process alternatives for the integration of starch ethanol and cellulosic lactic acid are compared, and some suggestions are given regarding the reuse of yeast following the cellulosic SSF step for lactic acid production.
引用
收藏
页码:1923 / 1932
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Production of ethanol, lipid and lactic acid from mixed agrowastes hydrolysate
    Singh, Jyoti
    Sharma, Abha
    Sharma, Pushpendra
    Tomar, Govind Singh
    Grover, Minakshi
    Singh, Surender
    Nain, Lata
    NATURAL PRODUCT RESEARCH, 2023, 37 (15) : 2575 - 2582
  • [12] EFFECTS OF LACTIC ACID, ACETIC ACID AND ETHANOL ON SILAGE FERMENTATIONS
    BYERS, FM
    MEISKE, JC
    GOODRICH, RD
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1969, 29 (01) : 178 - &
  • [13] Leuconostoc fallax, an acid and ethanol tolerant lactic acid bacterium
    Middelhoven, WJ
    Klijn, N
    JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 1997, 75 (01) : 57 - 60
  • [14] Production of acetic acid, ethanol and optical isomers of lactic acid by Lactobacillus strains isolated from industrial ethanol fermentations
    Costa, Vanessa Moreira
    Basso, Thiago Olitta
    Poleto Angeloni, Luis Henrique
    Oetterer, Marilia
    Basso, Luiz Carlos
    CIENCIA E AGROTECNOLOGIA, 2008, 32 (02): : 503 - 509
  • [15] Production of lactic acid from wastepaper as a cellulosic feedstock
    Schmidt, S
    Padukone, N
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1997, 18 (01): : 10 - 14
  • [16] SSF production of lactic acid from cellulosic biosludges
    Romani, Aloia
    Yanez, Remedios
    Garrote, Gil
    Alonso, Jose Luis
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 99 (10) : 4247 - 4254
  • [17] Optimal design of an integrated fermentation process for lactic acid production
    Lin, Hsun-Tung
    Wang, Feng-Sheng
    AICHE JOURNAL, 2007, 53 (02) : 449 - 459
  • [18] Integrated production of second generation ethanol and lactic acid from steam-exploded elephant grass
    Montipo, Sheila
    Ballesteros, Ignacio
    Fontana, Roselei Claudete
    Liu, Siqing
    Martins, Ayrton Figueiredo
    Ballesteros, Mercedes
    Camassola, Marli
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 249 : 1017 - 1024
  • [19] Dilute sulfuric acid fractionation of Korean food waste for ethanol and lactic acid production by yeast
    Kim, Yong Sean
    Jang, Ji Yeon
    Park, Seong Jik
    Um, Byung Hwan
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 74 : 231 - 240
  • [20] Ethanol metabolism by probiotic lactic acid bacteria in vivo
    Yang, W. Y.
    Ahn, Y. T.
    Lim, K. S.
    Huh, C. S.
    Baek, Y. J.
    Kim, H. S.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2004, 82 : 384 - 384