Injection of thermoset foam: comparison between simulation and experiment

被引:0
|
作者
R. Bouayad
J. Bikard
J. F. Agassant
机构
[1] FAURECIA AUTOMOTIVE SEATING S.A. ZI Brières les Scellés,
[2] Ecole des Mines de Paris,undefined
[3] Centre de Mise en Forme des Matériaux,undefined
关键词
foam expansion; chemical reactions; diphasic medium; finite element modeling; experiments;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The quality (cellular homogeneity, mechanical properties) of polyurethane foam’s structures mainly depends on the manufacturing process, during which two concomitant (principal) exothermic chemical reactions take place: the first one creates CO2 into the fluid matrix (germination of bubbles, expansion and coarsening of the foam) and the second one leads to the polymerization. In order to validate a model developed at CEMEF, an original experiment (RheoFoam System) has been created. It consists in an instrumented injection mould (closed or opened cylindrical cavity) in which the viscoelastic foam inflates. It allows measuring simultaneously the evolution of some technological parameters (the rise of the foam, the pressure distribution on the bottom of the mould and the temperature evolution inside the foam) which are a macroscopic signature of the evolution of the cellular microstructure. These temperature and pressure fields are then compared to those obtained using the numerical simulation. The results are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:683 / 686
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Long-domain simulation of flow in open-cell mesoporous metal foam and direct comparison to experiment
    Suleiman, Ahmed S.
    Dukhan, Nihad
    MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS, 2014, 196 : 104 - 114
  • [32] Nanoscale View of a Particle-Wall Contact - Comparison between Simulation and Experiment
    Haarmann, Alexander
    Mader-Arndt, Katja
    Tomas, Juergen
    Schmidt, Eberhard
    CHEMIE INGENIEUR TECHNIK, 2014, 86 (03) : 389 - 394
  • [33] Comparison between experiment and two simulation strategies for the extraction of focused ion beams
    Sutherland, O
    Keller, J
    Irzyk, M
    Boswell, R
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 2004, 75 (07): : 2379 - 2386
  • [34] Virgin domain structures in mesoscopic Co patterns: Comparison between simulation and experiment
    Cherifi, S
    Hertel, R
    Kirschner, J
    Wang, H
    Belkhou, R
    Locatelli, A
    Heun, S
    Pavlovska, A
    Bauer, E
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 2005, 98 (04)
  • [35] COMPARISON BETWEEN EXPERIMENT AND SIMULATION IN A REAL-TIME JOINT TRANSFORM CORRELATOR
    JUVELLS, I
    CARNICER, A
    VALLMITJANA, S
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS PART 1-REGULAR PAPERS BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS & REVIEW PAPERS, 1992, 31 (04): : 1076 - 1077
  • [36] Residual stresses in surface induction hardening of steels: Comparison between experiment and simulation
    Coupard, Dominique
    Palin-luc, Thierry
    Bristiel, Philippe
    Ji, Vincent
    Dumas, Christian
    MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING A-STRUCTURAL MATERIALS PROPERTIES MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROCESSING, 2008, 487 (1-2): : 328 - 339
  • [37] The surface topography of a magnetic fluid: a quantitative comparison between experiment and numerical simulation
    Gollwitzer, Christian
    Matthies, Gunar
    Richter, Reinhard
    Rehberg, Ingo
    Tobiska, Lutz
    JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2007, 571 : 455 - 474
  • [38] Comparison of the Shear Modulus of an Offshore Elastomeric Bearing between Numerical Simulation and Experiment
    Han, Dongseop
    Che, Wooseong
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (10):
  • [39] Electrostatic channeling of substrates between enzyme active sites: Comparison of simulation and experiment
    Elcock, AH
    Huber, GA
    McCammon, JA
    BIOCHEMISTRY, 1997, 36 (51) : 16049 - 16058
  • [40] Comparison between numerical simulation and on-orbit experiment of oscillating heat pipes
    Daimaru, Takurou
    Nagai, Hiroki
    Ando, Makiko
    Tanaka, Kosuke
    Okamoto, Atsushi
    Sugita, Hiroyuki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2017, 109 : 791 - 806