Research governance: new hope for ethics committees?

被引:0
|
作者
Frew D. [1 ]
Martlew A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Health Research and Ethics Branch, New South Wales Health.
关键词
Research Governance; Monash Bioethic Review; Institutional Requirement; Area Health Service; Privacy Principle;
D O I
10.1007/BF03351463
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
For many years there has been discussion regarding the problems confronting our current ethics review system. Commentators have identified numerous issues that threaten the sustainability of Australia's voluntary HREC system. Various ad hoc solutions to these problems have been posed, but have not resulted in any significant advances. However, in recent years, discourse regarding research governance has become prominent in the Australian research environment. The application of research governance principles is gaining momentum amongst the regulators of research, including research institutions and their governing bureaucracies. We argue that this is potentially the most significant development in several years towards creating a sustainable HREC system in Australia. The recognition by research institutions and their governing bureaucracies that the responsibility for overall research governance lies with them, rather than solely with their HRECs, is leading to a range of initiatives which should significantly lessen the burden on Australian ethics committees, and improve their ability to undertake their core task of reviewing the ethical aspects of research proposals.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 23
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ETHICS COMMITTEES OR COMMITTEES OF ETHICS
    TRIAS, MAB
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 1992, 98 (10): : 399 - 399
  • [42] Research ethics committees: the role of ethics in a regulatory authority
    McGuinness, S.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2008, 34 (09) : 695 - 700
  • [43] Statistical review by research ethics committees
    Williamson, P
    Hutton, JL
    Bliss, J
    Blunt, J
    Campbell, MJ
    Nicholson, R
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2000, 163 : 5 - 13
  • [44] Monitoring of health research by ethics committees
    Douglass, AJ
    Jarvis, A
    Bloore, S
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 111 (1061) : 79 - 81
  • [45] Research ethics committees: what is their contribution?
    Loff, B
    Black, J
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2004, 181 (08) : 440 - 441
  • [46] Reinforcing protection of Research Ethics Committees
    Kottow, Miguel
    REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2017, 145 (11) : 1500 - 1500
  • [47] RESEARCH ETHICS AND RESEARCH GOVERNANCE
    Sieber, Joan E.
    Tolich, Martin
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2012, 7 (02) : 1 - 2
  • [48] Ethics review in research - Ethics committees are risk averse
    Minnis, HJ
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7441): : 710 - 711
  • [49] Ethics and clinical research: what developments for CPPs and research ethics committees?
    Berdai, Driss
    Guerin, Aurelie
    Perol, David
    Girault, Cecile
    Molimard, Mathieu
    Amiel, Philippe
    Beaussier, Helene
    Bertoye, Pierre-Henri
    Cornu, Catherine
    Deplanque, Dominique
    Dreyfuss, Didier
    Duchossoy, Luc
    Fouret, Cecile
    Haaser, Thibaud
    Le Louarn, Anne
    Rifai, Soraya
    Thierry, Jean-Pierre
    THERAPIE, 2025, 80 (01): : 135 - 144
  • [50] LOCAL AND CENTRAL RESEARCH ETHICS COMMITTEES
    DEWHURST, JK
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 305 (6847): : 257 - 257