Diagnosing diabetes mellitus – do we need new criteria?

被引:0
|
作者
D. R. McCance
R. L. Hanson
D. J. Pettitt
P. H. Bennett
D. R. Hadden
W. C. Knowler
机构
[1] Sir George E. Clark Metabolic Unit,
[2] Royal Victoria Hospital,undefined
[3] Belfast,undefined
[4] Northern Ireland,undefined
[5] UK,undefined
[6] Diabetes and Arthritis Epidemiology Section,undefined
[7] National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases,undefined
[8] Phoenix,undefined
[9] Arizona,undefined
[10] USA,undefined
来源
Diabetologia | 1997年 / 40卷
关键词
Keywords Diabetes mellitus; diagnosis; oral glucose tolerance test; fasting plasma glucose; 2-h plasma glucose; haemoglobin A1c; retinopathy; nephropathy; complications.;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The current classification and diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus were introduced by the United States National Data Group in 1979 and endorsed by the World Health Organization in 1980, with modifications in 1985 and 1994. The criteria, chosen to reflect the risk of complications, were the synthesis of considerable thought and expertise and represented a consensus which, it was hoped, would prove helpful to all those involved with diabetes – practising clinician, research scientist and epidemiologist alike. The inconvenience, variability and nonphysiological nature of the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) are well-recognised. In spite of these limitations the 2-h post-load plasma glucose has remained the standard against which all other tests have been evaluated. This article reviews the original justification for the OGTT, and in the light of more recent epidemiological research seeks to place the current diagnostic criteria for diabetes into a pathophysiological, diagnostic and prognostic perspective. [Diabetologia (1997) 40: 247–255]
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 255
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus - do the new WHO criteria make a difference?
    Schmidt, MI
    Matos, MC
    Reichelt, AJ
    Forti, AC
    de Lima, L
    Duncan, BB
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2000, 17 (05) : 376 - 380
  • [22] The challenge of diagnosis and classification in early ankylosing spondylitis - Do we need new criteria?
    Rudwaleit, M
    Khan, MA
    Sieper, J
    [J]. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2005, 52 (04): : 1000 - 1008
  • [23] Reply: Do we need new MRI criteria for the diagnosis of radiologically isolated syndrome?
    Lebrun-Frenay, Christine
    Kantarci, Orhun H.
    Siva, Aksel
    Pelletier, Daniel
    Okuda, Darin T.
    [J]. BRAIN, 2023, 146 (11) : E104 - E106
  • [24] NEW TECHNOLOGY - DO WE NEED IT
    MAY, JR
    [J]. CIM BULLETIN, 1984, 77 (870): : 52 - 52
  • [25] Do we need a new levodopa?
    Mueller, Thomas
    [J]. NEURAL REGENERATION RESEARCH, 2016, 11 (05) : 731 - 732
  • [26] Do we need new antidepressants?
    Hindmarch, I
    [J]. HUMAN PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1997, 12 : S115 - S119
  • [27] Do we need new guidelines?
    Jaeger, K. A.
    [J]. ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2008, 29 (01): : 24 - 27
  • [28] Do we need new antibiotics?
    Rolain, J. -M.
    Abat, C.
    Jimeno, M. -T.
    Fournier, P. -E.
    Raoult, D.
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2016, 22 (05) : 408 - 415
  • [29] Do we need a new paradigm?
    Weingand, DE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, 1996, 37 (03) : 294 - 296
  • [30] DO WE NEED THE NEW PARTY
    WELLSTONE, P
    OWENS, MR
    PIERCE, J
    FRIEDMAN, ED
    TAKAGI, T
    SAIKA, P
    LOWI, TJ
    CAGAN, L
    POPE, S
    ROGERS, J
    [J]. NATION, 1992, 255 (11) : 382 - &