A Comparison of Boron Supplement and Tamsulosin as Medical Expulsive Therapy for Urinary Stones After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

被引:0
|
作者
Saba Jalali
Nasrin Borumandnia
Abbas Basiri
Mohammadreza Nagiee
Fahimeh Bagheri Amiri
Sanaz Tavasoli
Yashar Kheirolahkhani
Maryam Taheri
机构
[1] University of British Columbia,Urology and Nephrology Research Center
[2] Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Centre for Emerging and Reemerging Infectious Diseases
[3] Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences,undefined
[4] Pasteur Institute of Iran,undefined
[5] Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,undefined
来源
关键词
Boron; ESWL; Medical expulsive therapy; Tamsulosin; Trace elements;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Treatment with alpha-blockers has been used in many studies to facilitate stone clearance after extra-corporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), based on mediating ureteral wall relaxation. Ureteral wall edema is another barrier against the stone passage. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of boron supplement (due to its anti-inflammatory effect) and tamsulosin in the passage of stone fragments after ESWL. Eligible patients after ESWL were randomly assigned to two groups and were treated with boron supplement (10 mg/BD) or tamsulosin (0.4 mg per night) for 2 weeks. The primary outcome was the stone expulsion rate according to the remained fragmented stone burden. The secondary outcomes were the time of stone clearance, pain intensity, drug side effects, and the need for auxiliary procedures. In this randomized control trial, 200 eligible patients were treated with boron supplement or tamsulosin. Finally, 89 and 81 patients in the two groups completed the study, respectively. The expulsion rate was 46.6% in the boron and 38.7% in the tamsulosin group, which there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.003), as well as the time of stone clearance (7.47 ± 22.4 vs 6.52 ± 18.45, days, p = 0.648, respectively), after 2-week follow-up. Moreover, pain intensity was the same in both groups. No Significant side effects were reported in the two groups. Boron supplement could be effective as adjuvant medical expulsive therapy after ESWL with no significant side effects in short-term follow-up.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:5126 / 5133
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The efficacy of tamsulosin therapy after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for ureteric calculi: A prospective randomised, controlled study
    Mohamed, Hassan Ismail
    ARAB JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 11 (04) : 398 - 404
  • [42] Is prophylactic antibiotics for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy necessary? A randomized controlled trial
    Hsu, C. -K.
    Yang, S-D
    Hsieh, C. H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2013, 42 : S107 - S107
  • [43] PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF SILODOSIN AND TAMSULOSIN AS MEDICAL EXPULSIVE THERAPY FOR DISTAL URETERIC STONES
    Imperatore, Vittorio
    Di Meo, Sergio
    Buonopane, Roberto
    Creta, Massimiliano
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A339 - A340
  • [44] Tamsulosin as a Medical Expulsive Therapy for Ureteral Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Bayne, David B.
    Chi, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (05): : 955 - 955
  • [45] Design and challenges of a randomized clinical trial of medical expulsive therapy (tamsulosin) for urolithiasis in the emergency department
    Pamela, Burrows K.
    Judd, Hollander E.
    Allan, Wolfson B.
    Michael, Kurz C.
    Lorna, Richards
    Sara, DiFiore
    Phillip, Watts
    Nivedita, Patkar
    Jeremy, Brown
    Stephen, Jackman
    Ziya, Kirkali
    John, Kusek W.
    Chloe, Michel
    Andrew, Meltzer C.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2017, 52 : 91 - 94
  • [46] Clinical study on extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper urinary tract stones of obese patients
    Liu, Yuqing
    Zhuang, shenrong
    Ma, Iulin
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 : A247 - A247
  • [47] EMERGENCY EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY FOR UPPER URETERIC STONES WITH OR WITHOUT PRE-STENTING: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
    El-Ghazaly, Tarek
    Vita, Shameem
    Hussain, Salam
    Al-Obaidy, Abdulkader
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E832 - E833
  • [48] Efficacy of Tamsulosin Oral Controlled Absorption System After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy to Treat Urolithiasis
    Georgiev, Marin I.
    Ormanov, Dimitar I.
    Vassilev, Vasil D.
    Dimitrov, Plamen D.
    Mladenov, Vladislav D.
    Popov, Elenko P.
    Simeonov, Petar P.
    Panchev, Petar K.
    UROLOGY, 2011, 78 (05) : 1023 - 1026
  • [49] The efficacy of tamsulosin vs. nifedipine for the medical expulsive therapy of distal ureteric stones: A randomised clinical trial
    Gandhi, Himesh R.
    Agrawal, Chandrasekhar
    ARAB JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 11 (04) : 405 - 410
  • [50] Adjunctive Medical Therapy with α-Blocker after Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy of Renal and Ureteral Stones: A Meta-Analysis
    Li, Mingchao
    Wang, Zhengyun
    Yang, Jun
    Guo, Xiaolin
    Wang, Tao
    Wang, Shaogang
    Yin, Chunping
    Liu, Jihong
    Ye, Zhangqun
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (04):