Estimating the spatial distribution of organic carbon density for the soils of Ohio, USA

被引:0
|
作者
Sandeep Kumar
Rattan Lal
Desheng Liu
Rashid Rafiq
机构
[1] South Dakota State University,Department of Plant Science, Room 248C NPB
[2] The Ohio State University,Carbon Management and Sequestration Center, School of Environment and Natural Resources
[3] The Ohio State University,Department of Geography and Department of Statistics
[4] University of Oklahoma,Department of Microbiology & Plant Biology
来源
关键词
geographically weighted regression; multiple linear regression; major land resource areas; root mean square error; soil organic carbon;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Historical database of National Soil Survey Center containing 1424 geo-referenced soil profiles was used in this study for estimating the organic carbon (SOC) for the soils of Ohio, USA. Specific objective of the study was to estimate the spatial distribution of SOC density (C stock per unit area) to 1.0-m depth for soils of Ohio using geographically weighted regression (GWR), and compare the results with that obtained from multiple linear regression (MLR). About 80% of the analytical data were used for calibration and 20% for validation. A total of 20 variables including terrain attributes, climate data, bedrock geology, and land use data were used for mapping the SOC density. Results showed that the GWR provided better estimations with the lowest (3.81 kg m−2) root mean square error (RMSE) than MLR approach. Total estimated SOC pool for soils in Ohio ranged from 727 to 742 Tg. This study demonstrates that, the local spatial statistical technique, the GWR can perform better in capturing the spatial distribution of SOC across the study region as compared to other global spatial statistical techniques such as MLR. Thus, GWR enhances the accuracy for mapping SOC density.
引用
收藏
页码:280 / 296
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Organic soils in Germany, their distribution and carbon stocks
    Rosskopf, Niko t
    Fell, Holger
    Zeitz, Jutta
    [J]. CATENA, 2015, 133 : 157 - 170
  • [22] Modelling the distribution of organic carbon in the soils of Chile
    Padarian, Jose
    Perez-Quezada, Jorge
    Seguel, Oscar
    [J]. DIGITAL SOIL ASSESSMENTS AND BEYOND, 2012, : 329 - 333
  • [23] Estimating spatial distribution of soil organic carbon for the Midwestern United States using historical database
    Kumar, Sandeep
    [J]. CHEMOSPHERE, 2015, 127 : 49 - 57
  • [24] Carbon storage and distribution in tundra soils of Arctic Alaska, USA
    Michaelson, GJ
    Ping, CL
    Kimble, JM
    [J]. ARCTIC AND ALPINE RESEARCH, 1996, 28 (04) : 414 - 424
  • [25] Organic phosphorus content of Ohio soils
    Schollenberger, CJ
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE, 1920, 10 (02) : 127 - 141
  • [26] Spatial distribution of organic carbon fractions and δ13C in urban soils, Shanghai, China
    Xu, Naizheng
    Bai, Xiao
    [J]. ISRAEL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2017, 63 (01) : 78 - 84
  • [27] Comparison of methods for determining organic carbon content of urban soils in Central Ohio
    Hernandez, Tania D. Burgos
    Slater, Brian K.
    Shaffer, Jared M.
    Basta, Nicholas
    [J]. GEODERMA REGIONAL, 2023, 34
  • [28] Soil organic carbon density spatial distribution and influencing factors in a karst mountainous basin
    Zhang, Zhenming
    Zhou, Yunchao
    Wang, Shijie
    Huang, Xianfei
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2017, 26 (05): : 2363 - 2374
  • [29] ROADSIDE DUSTS AND SOILS CONTAMINATION IN CINCINNATI, OHIO, USA
    TONG, STY
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1990, 14 (01) : 107 - 113
  • [30] Carbon sequestration in the soils of aquaculture ponds, crop land, and forest land in southern Ohio, USA
    Subhendu Adhikari
    Rattan Lal
    Han-Ping Wang
    [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2014, 186 : 1569 - 1574