Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy followed by Salvage Surgery: Effect on Survival of Patients with Primary Noncurative Gastric Cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Masahiko Yano
Hitoshi Shiozaki
Masatoshi Inoue
Shigeyuki Tamura
Yuichiro Doki
Takushi Yasuda
Yoshiyuki Fujiwara
Toshimasa Tsujinaka
Morito Monden
机构
[1] Department of Surgery and Clinical Oncology,
[2] Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine,undefined
[3] 2-2 Yamadaoka,undefined
[4] Suita,undefined
[5] Osaka 565-0871,undefined
[6] Japan,undefined
来源
World Journal of Surgery | 2002年 / 26卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The prognosis for gastric cancer patients who undergo noncurative resection is extremely poor. This study evaluated the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary noncurative gastric cancer. Thirty-four patients with biopsy-proven noncurative gastric cancer were treated with either of two neoadjuvant chemotherapies: FEMTXP (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, methotrexate, cisplatin) or THP-FLPM (pirarubicin, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, cisplatin, mitomycin C). Noncurability was determined by conventional staging procedures, staging laparoscopy, and exploratory laparotomy. After chemotherapy the resectability of the tumors was reassessed. Patients who were judged to be candidates for curative resection underwent salvage surgery. Of the final 33 patients, 8 (24.2%) showed a major response [0 complete response (CR), 8 partial response (PR)]. In three patients the second laparoscopy revealed disappearance of the peritoneal metastasis. Of the 33 patients, 14 (42.4%) underwent salvage surgery, including 8 curative resections (2 curability A, 6 curability B). Pathologic examinations revealed a grade 2 response in eight patients but no grade 3 response. Univariate analysis showed the following to be significant prognostic factors: histology type (differentiated type vs. undifferentiated type; p = 0.035), T4 as a noncurative factor (T4 vs. T3 or less; p = 0.025), clinical response (PR + no change vs. progressive disease; p = 0.002), and salvage surgery (resected vs. unresected; p = 0.001). Among these factors, salvage surgery was found to be the only independent prognostic factor by multivariate analysis, with a relative risk of 0.253 and a 95% confidence interval of 0.066 to 0.974. The treatment was well tolerated. Major toxicities of WHO grade 3 or more were leukopenia in 20 (60.6%), gastrointestinal toxicities in 5 (15.2%), renal toxicities in 2 (6.1%), and alopecia in 1 (3.0%). In conclusion, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is effective for primary noncurative gastric cancer when salvage surgery can be performed. A chemotherapy regimen with a higher complete response rate would improve the prognosis of this dismal disease even more.
引用
收藏
页码:1155 / 1159
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of time to breast cancer surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy on survival outcomes
    Mahmoud Al-Masri
    Basim Aljalabneh
    Hani Al-Najjar
    Tamador Al-Shamaileh
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2021, 186 : 7 - 13
  • [42] Effect of time to breast cancer surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy on survival outcomes
    Al-Masri, Mahmoud
    Aljalabneh, Basim
    Al-Najjar, Hani
    Al-Shamaileh, Tamador
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2021, 186 (01) : 7 - 13
  • [43] Clinicopathological factors affecting the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer
    Jiang, Lin
    Ma, Zhiqiang
    Ye, Xin
    Kang, Weiming
    Yu, Jianchun
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [44] Prophylactic effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients with postoperative complications
    Kojiro Eto
    Naoki Hiki
    Koshi Kumagai
    Yoshiaki Shoji
    Yasuo Tsuda
    Yosuke Kano
    Itaru Yasufuku
    Yasuhiro Okumura
    Masahiro Tsujiura
    Satoshi Ida
    Souya Nunobe
    Manabu Ohashi
    Takeshi Sano
    Toshiharu Yamaguchi
    Gastric Cancer, 2018, 21 : 703 - 709
  • [45] Primary cytoreductive surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery in patients with advanced primary epithelial ovarian cancer in low resources setting: a randomized clinical trial
    Abou-Taleb, Hisham
    Hussien, Ali
    Ismail, Alaa
    Abdel-Kawi, Af
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2024, 34 (SUPPL_3) : A193 - A194
  • [46] Primary Cytoreductive Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery in Patients with Advanced Primary Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in Low Resources Setting: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Abutaleb, Hisham
    Hussien, Ali
    Khalaf, Mohamed
    Badary, Dalia M.
    Ismail, Alaa M.
    Hassanein, Sara
    Algizawy, Samy
    Moustafa, S. A. M.
    Farghaly, Rabab Mohmed Mumdouh
    Abdel-Kawi, A. F.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2024,
  • [47] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with primarily unresectable, advanced-stage ovarian cancer
    Mazzeo, F
    Berlière, M
    Kerger, J
    Squifflet, J
    Duck, L
    D'Hondt, V
    Humblet, Y
    Donnez, J
    Machiels, JP
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2003, 90 (01) : 163 - 169
  • [48] Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Primary Surgery in Advanced Ovarian Cancer
    Chua, Terence C.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 363 (24): : 2371 - 2371
  • [49] Review of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Trachelectomy: Which Cervical Cancer Patients Would Be Suitable for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Fertility-Sparing Surgery?
    Robova, Helena
    Rob, Lukas
    Halaska, Michael Jiri
    Pluta, Marek
    Skapa, Petr
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2015, 17 (05) : 1 - 5
  • [50] Review of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Trachelectomy: Which Cervical Cancer Patients Would Be Suitable for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Fertility-Sparing Surgery?
    Helena Robova
    Lukas Rob
    Michael Jiri Halaska
    Marek Pluta
    Petr Skapa
    Current Oncology Reports, 2015, 17