Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy followed by Salvage Surgery: Effect on Survival of Patients with Primary Noncurative Gastric Cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Masahiko Yano
Hitoshi Shiozaki
Masatoshi Inoue
Shigeyuki Tamura
Yuichiro Doki
Takushi Yasuda
Yoshiyuki Fujiwara
Toshimasa Tsujinaka
Morito Monden
机构
[1] Department of Surgery and Clinical Oncology,
[2] Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine,undefined
[3] 2-2 Yamadaoka,undefined
[4] Suita,undefined
[5] Osaka 565-0871,undefined
[6] Japan,undefined
来源
World Journal of Surgery | 2002年 / 26卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The prognosis for gastric cancer patients who undergo noncurative resection is extremely poor. This study evaluated the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary noncurative gastric cancer. Thirty-four patients with biopsy-proven noncurative gastric cancer were treated with either of two neoadjuvant chemotherapies: FEMTXP (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, methotrexate, cisplatin) or THP-FLPM (pirarubicin, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, cisplatin, mitomycin C). Noncurability was determined by conventional staging procedures, staging laparoscopy, and exploratory laparotomy. After chemotherapy the resectability of the tumors was reassessed. Patients who were judged to be candidates for curative resection underwent salvage surgery. Of the final 33 patients, 8 (24.2%) showed a major response [0 complete response (CR), 8 partial response (PR)]. In three patients the second laparoscopy revealed disappearance of the peritoneal metastasis. Of the 33 patients, 14 (42.4%) underwent salvage surgery, including 8 curative resections (2 curability A, 6 curability B). Pathologic examinations revealed a grade 2 response in eight patients but no grade 3 response. Univariate analysis showed the following to be significant prognostic factors: histology type (differentiated type vs. undifferentiated type; p = 0.035), T4 as a noncurative factor (T4 vs. T3 or less; p = 0.025), clinical response (PR + no change vs. progressive disease; p = 0.002), and salvage surgery (resected vs. unresected; p = 0.001). Among these factors, salvage surgery was found to be the only independent prognostic factor by multivariate analysis, with a relative risk of 0.253 and a 95% confidence interval of 0.066 to 0.974. The treatment was well tolerated. Major toxicities of WHO grade 3 or more were leukopenia in 20 (60.6%), gastrointestinal toxicities in 5 (15.2%), renal toxicities in 2 (6.1%), and alopecia in 1 (3.0%). In conclusion, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is effective for primary noncurative gastric cancer when salvage surgery can be performed. A chemotherapy regimen with a higher complete response rate would improve the prognosis of this dismal disease even more.
引用
收藏
页码:1155 / 1159
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by salvage surgery: Effect on survival of patients with primary noncurative gastric cancer
    Yano, M
    Shiozaki, H
    Inoue, M
    Tamura, S
    Doki, Y
    Yasuda, T
    Fujiwara, Y
    Tsujinaka, T
    Monden, M
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 26 (09) : 1155 - 1159
  • [2] Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC Improves Survival in Peritoneal Metastatic Gastric Cancer
    Akturk Esen, Selin
    Ozgun, Yigit Mehmet
    Hasturk, Denizcan
    Ucar, Gokhan
    Bostanci, Erdal Birol
    Sendur, Mehmet Ali Nahit
    Uncu, Dogan
    ONCOLOGY, 2023, 101 (05) : 321 - 327
  • [3] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery in gastric cancer patients with extensive lymph node metastasis
    Ito, Seiji
    Ito, Yuichi
    Misawa, Kazunari
    Shimizu, Yasuhiro
    Kinoshita, Taira
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 6 (06): : 291 - 294
  • [4] Primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced ovarian cancer
    Zheng, Hong
    Gao, Yu-Nong
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 24 (04) : 304 - 309
  • [5] Primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced ovarian cancer
    Hong Zheng
    Yu-Nong Gao
    ChineseJournalofCancerResearch, 2012, 24 (04) : 304 - 309
  • [6] Primary surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer
    Vergote, Ignace
    Amant, Frederic
    Kristensen, Gunnar
    Ehlen, Tom
    Reed, Nick S.
    Casado, Antonio
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 47 : S88 - S92
  • [7] PRIMARY DEBULKING SURGERY OR NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOLLOWED BY INTERVAL DEBULKING SURGERY FOR PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER?
    Mansouri, H.
    Zemni, I.
    Ben Safta, I.
    Achouri, L.
    Ben Hassouna, J.
    Hechiche, M.
    Chargui, R.
    Rahal, K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 : A120 - A120
  • [8] Primary debulking surgery vs. neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced ovarian cancer
    Ce Bian
    Kui Yao
    Li Li
    Tao Yi
    Xia Zhao
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2016, 293 : 163 - 168
  • [9] Primary debulking surgery vs. neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced ovarian cancer
    Bian, Ce
    Yao, Kui
    Li, Li
    Yi, Tao
    Zhao, Xia
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2016, 293 (01) : 163 - 168
  • [10] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy: survival benefit in gastric cancer
    Das, Manjulika
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2017, 18 (06): : E307 - E307