Transparency in peer review benefits students

被引：0
|
作者：
Joel Kelly
机构：
[1] University of Alberta,Department of Chemistry
来源：
Nature Materials | 2011年 / 10卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：254 / 254
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] WANO Peer Review - Organization and Benefits as Seen by WANO
    Haferburg, Manfred
    ATW-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUCLEAR POWER, 2010, 55 (02): : 94 - +
  • [42] Electronic peer review: benefits outweigh the learning curve
    Harder, DR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 281 (02): : H467 - H467
  • [43] Discovering the Benefits of Group Peer Review of Submitted Manuscripts
    Richards, Boyd F.
    Cardell, Elizabeth M.
    Chow, Candace J.
    Moore, Kathryn B.
    Moorman, Krystal L.
    O'Connor, Meghan
    Hart, Sara E.
    TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 2020, 32 (01) : 104 - 109
  • [44] Peer review: What's expected and who benefits?
    Marr, Celia M.
    Southwood, Louise
    Barnett, Tim
    EQUINE VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2016, 48 (01) : 5 - 5
  • [45] Peer Mentoring by Medical Students for Medical Students: A Scoping Review
    Preovolos, Christos
    Grant, Abby
    Rayner, Morgan
    Fitzgerald, Kylie
    Ng, Louisa
    MEDICAL SCIENCE EDUCATOR, 2024, : 1577 - 1602
  • [46] Peer Review Factors That Motivate Students to Provide Supportive Peer Feedback
    Tornwall, Joni
    McGaughy, Melinda
    Schubert, Carolyn
    NURSE EDUCATOR, 2022, 47 (02) : 114 - 119
  • [47] Variability in students' evaluating processes in peer assessment with calibrated peer review
    Russell, J.
    Van Horne, S.
    Ward, A. S.
    Bettis, E. A.
    Gikonyo, J.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2017, 33 (02) : 178 - 190
  • [48] Open versus blind peer review: is anonymity better than transparency?
    Shoham, Natalie
    Pitman, Alexandra
    BJPSYCH ADVANCES, 2021, 27 (04) : 247 - 254
  • [49] Open knowledge creation: Bringing transparency and inclusiveness to the peer review process
    Hardaway, D.E. (don.hardaway@gmail.com), 1600, University of Minnesota (36):
  • [50] Peer-Review Guidelines Promoting Replicability and Transparency in Psychological Science
    Davis, William E.
    Giner-Sorolla, Roger
    Lindsay, D. Stephen
    Lougheed, Jessica P.
    Makel, Matthew C.
    Meier, Matt E.
    Sun, Jessie
    Vaughn, Leigh Ann
    Zelenski, John M.
    ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 1 (04) : 556 - 573
12345