Trends in national and county-level Hispanic mortality in the United States, 2011–2020

被引:0
|
作者
Ashish Sarraju
Summer Ngo
Melanie Ashland
David Scheinker
Fatima Rodriguez
机构
[1] Stanford University School of Medicine,Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute
[2] Stanford University School of Medicine,Stanford Cancer Institute
[3] Stanford University School of Medicine,Clinical Excellence Research Center
[4] Stanford University,Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Center for Academic Medicine
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Hispanic populations generally experience more adverse socioeconomic conditions yet demonstrate lower mortality compared with Non-Hispanic White (NHW) populations in the US. This finding of a mortality advantage is well-described as the “Hispanic paradox.” The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has disproportionately affected Hispanic populations. To quantify these effects, we evaluated US national and county-level trends in Hispanic versus NHW mortality from 2011 through 2020. We found that a previously steady Hispanic mortality advantage significantly decreased in 2020, potentially driven by COVID-19-attributable Hispanic mortality. Nearly 16% of US counties experienced a reversal of their pre-pandemic Hispanic mortality advantage such that their Hispanic mortality exceeded NHW mortality in 2020. An additional 50% experienced a decrease in a pre-pandemic Hispanic mortality advantage. Our work provides a quantitative understanding of the disproportionate burden of the pandemic on Hispanic health and the Hispanic paradox and provides a renewed impetus to tackle the factors driving these concerning disparities.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] National Trends and County-Level Patterns of Prescription for PCSK-9 Inhibitors Among Medicare Beneficiaries in the United States
    Nargesi, Arash Aghajani
    Hanna, Jonathan
    Khera, Rohan
    CIRCULATION, 2021, 144
  • [32] The impact of county-level radiation oncologist density on prostate cancer mortality in the United States
    S Aneja
    J B Yu
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2012, 15 : 391 - 396
  • [33] Robust correlates of county-level growth in the United States
    Higgins, Matthew J.
    Young, Andrew T.
    Levy, Daniel
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2010, 17 (03) : 293 - 296
  • [34] The impact of county-level radiation oncologist density on prostate cancer mortality in the United States
    Aneja, S.
    Yu, J. B.
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2012, 15 (04) : 391 - 396
  • [35] Carpool to work: Determinants at the county-level in the United States
    Benita, Francisco
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 87
  • [36] A National, County-Level Evaluation of the Association Between COVID-19 and Sexually Transmitted Infections Within the United States in 2020
    Pollack, Catherine C.
    Bradburne, Jordan
    Lee, Natalie K.
    Manabe, Yukari C.
    Widdice, Lea E.
    Gaydos, Charlotte A.
    Tuddenham, Susan A.
    Rompalo, Anne M.
    Jackman, Joany
    Timm, Collin M.
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 2023, 50 (08) : 536 - 542
  • [37] Average county-level IQ predicts county-level disadvantage and several county-level mortality risk rates
    Barnes, J. C.
    Beaver, Kevin M.
    Boutwell, Brian B.
    INTELLIGENCE, 2013, 41 (01) : 59 - 66
  • [38] County-to-county migration is associated with county-level racial bias in the United States
    Jin, Rui
    Calanchini, Jimmy
    Ratliff, Kate A.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [39] County-Level Characteristics Associated with Variation in ESKD Mortality in the United States, 2010-2018
    Snow, Kylie K.
    Patzer, Rachel E.
    Patel, Shivani A.
    Harding, Jessica L.
    KIDNEY360, 2022, 3 (05): : 891 - 899
  • [40] County-level Differences in Liver-related Mortality, Waitlisting, and Liver Transplantation in the United States
    Cannon, Robert M.
    Nassel, Ariann
    Walker, Jeffery T.
    Sheikh, Saulat S.
    Orandi, Babak J.
    Shah, Malay B.
    Lynch, Raymond J.
    Goldberg, David S.
    Locke, Jayme E.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 106 (09) : 1799 - 1806