Future projections of biodiversity and ecosystem services in Europe with two integrated assessment models

被引:0
|
作者
Clara J. Veerkamp
Robert W. Dunford
Paula A. Harrison
Maryia Mandryk
Jörg A. Priess
Aafke M. Schipper
Elke Stehfest
Rob Alkemade
机构
[1] PBL - Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency,Environmental Change Institute
[2] UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology,Institute for Water and Wetland Research
[3] Oxford University,Environmental Systems Analyses Group
[4] UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology,undefined
[5] UFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research,undefined
[6] Radboud University,undefined
[7] Wageningen University,undefined
来源
关键词
Integrated assessment modelling; IMAGE-GLOBIO; CLIMSAVE IAP; Scenario analysis; Trade-offs; Intermodel comparison;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Projections of future changes in biodiversity and ecosystem services (BES) are of increasing importance to inform policy and decision-making on options for conservation and sustainable use of BES. Scenario-based modelling is a powerful tool to assess these future changes. This study assesses the consequences for BES in Europe under four socio-environmental scenarios designed from a BES perspective. We evaluated these scenarios using two integrated assessment models (IMAGE-GLOBIO and CLIMSAVE IAP, respectively). Our results showed that (i) climate and land use change will continue to pose significant threats to biodiversity and some ecosystem services, even in the most optimistic scenario; (ii) none of the four scenarios achieved overall preservation of BES in Europe; and (iii) targeted policies (e.g. on climate change, biodiversity conservation and sustainable land management) and behavioural change (e.g. reducing meat consumption, water-saving behaviour) reduced the magnitude of BES loss. These findings stress the necessity of more ambitious policies and actions if BES in Europe are to be safeguarded. We further found that the multi-modelling approach was critical to account for complementary BES dimensions and highlighted different sources of uncertainties (e.g. related to land use allocation, driving forces behind BES changes, trade assumptions), which facilitated nuanced and contextualised insights with respect to possible BES futures.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Synthesizing plausible futures for biodiversity and ecosystem services in Europe and Central Asia using scenario archetypes
    Harrison, Paula A.
    Harmackova, Zuzana, V
    Karabulut, Armagan Aloe
    Brotons, Lluis
    Cantele, Matthew
    Claudet, Joachim
    Dunford, Robert W.
    Guisan, Antoine
    Holman, Ian P.
    Jacobs, Sander
    Kok, Kasper
    Lobanova, Anastasia
    Moran-Ordonez, Alejandra
    Pedde, Simona
    Rixen, Christian
    Santos-Martin, Fernando
    Schlaepfer, Martin A.
    Solidoro, Cosimo
    Sonrel, Anthony
    Hauck, Jennifer
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2019, 24 (02):
  • [42] Integrated assessment models for ecologists: the present and the future
    Harfoot, Michael
    Tittensor, Derek P.
    Newbold, Tim
    McInerny, Greg
    Smith, Matthew J.
    Scharlemann, Joern P. W.
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2014, 23 (02): : 124 - 143
  • [43] Ecosystem service value losses from coastal erosion in Europe: historical trends and future projections
    P. C. Roebeling
    L. Costa
    L. Magalhães-Filho
    V. Tekken
    [J]. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 2013, 17 : 389 - 395
  • [44] Ecosystem service value losses from coastal erosion in Europe: historical trends and future projections
    Roebeling, P. C.
    Costa, L.
    Magalhaes-Filho, L.
    Tekken, V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COASTAL CONSERVATION, 2013, 17 (03) : 389 - 395
  • [45] The Co-production of Scale and Power: The Case of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment and the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
    Beck, Silke
    Esguerra, Alejandro
    Goerg, Christoph
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2017, 19 (05) : 534 - 549
  • [46] A quantitative assessment of policy options for no net loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services in the European Union
    Schulp, C. J. E.
    Van Teeffelen, A. J. A.
    Tucker, G.
    Verburg, P. H.
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2016, 57 : 151 - 163
  • [47] Integrating Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Life Cycle Assessment: Methodological Proposals for New Challenges
    Teixeira, Ricardo F. M.
    [J]. SDEWES: THE 8TH CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF ENERGY, WATER AND ENVIRONMENT SYSTEMS, 2014, 42 : 127 - 132
  • [48] Biodiversity and ecosystem services in life cycle impact assessment - Inventory objects or impact categories?
    Callesen, Ingeborg
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2016, 22 : 94 - 103
  • [49] A farm-scale biodiversity and ecosystem services assessment tool: the healthy farm index
    Quinn, John E.
    Brandle, James R.
    Johnson, Ron J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 11 (02) : 176 - 192
  • [50] Monitoring Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Colombia's High Andean Ecosystems: Toward an Integrated Strategy
    Llambi, Luis D.
    Becerra, Maria Teresa
    Peralvo, Manuel
    Avella, Andres
    Baruffol, Martin
    Flores, Liz J.
    [J]. MOUNTAIN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 39 (03) : A8 - A20