Performance and Accountability—A Theoretical Discussion and an Empirical Assessment

被引:4
|
作者
Christensen T. [1 ]
Lægreid P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Political Science, University of Oslo, Oslo
[2] Department of Administration and Organization Theory, University of Bergen, Bergen
关键词
Accountability; Administrative reform; Norway; Performance; Welfare administration;
D O I
10.1007/s11115-013-0267-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper starts with a theoretical discussion on the relationship between performance and accountability in public organizations with a special focus on administrative reforms. Accountability theory, based in the work of Dubnick/Romzek, Bovens, Behn, Bouckaert, Halligan and Pollitt, is discussed and related to different aspects of performance. How ambiguous is the relationship between accountability and performance? Do different types of accountability relate to different aspects of performance or pose certain challenges in NPM reforms, post-NPM reforms and hybrid reforms? The second part of the paper illustrates performance and accountability relations in a large welfare administration reform in Norway by addressing the experiences different actor have had of performance and accountability dynamics. We focus on how the reform has affected different kinds of accountability relations and the relationship between accountability and performance. The data used are document studies, interviews and survey data from a large evaluation project. A main finding is that the relationship between administrative reform and accountability is ambiguous and contested. © 2014, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 225
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ASSESSMENT OF EMPIRICAL CONCRETE IMPACT FORMULAS - DISCUSSION
    HEALEY, JJ
    DOBBS, N
    JOURNAL OF THE STRUCTURAL DIVISION-ASCE, 1981, 107 (05): : 1015 - 1016
  • [22] Accountability as a service for robotics: Performance assessment of different accountability strategies for autonomous robots
    Fernandez-Becerra, Laura
    Manuel Guerrero-Higueras, Angel
    Rodriguez-Lera, Francisco Javier
    Matellan, Vicente
    LOGIC JOURNAL OF THE IGPL, 2024, 32 (02) : 243 - 262
  • [23] The empirical assessment of agency accountability: a regime approach and an application to the German Bundesnetzagentur
    Biela, Jan
    Papadopoulos, Yannis
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2014, 80 (02) : 362 - 381
  • [24] PERFORMANCE OF SOME EMPIRICAL PHOSPHORUS MODELS - DISCUSSION
    LUNG, WS
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1983, 109 (04): : 985 - 986
  • [25] ANALYSIS OF THE DIMENSIONS OF PORTFOLIO IN IT AND RBV: A THEORETICAL-EMPIRICAL DISCUSSION
    Giacomini, Monica Maier
    Pacheco, Edenir
    Rosa, Paula Maier
    Gabriel Rosa, Luiz Henrique
    REVISTA GEINTEC-GESTAO INOVACAO E TECNOLOGIAS, 2013, 3 (03): : 181 - 194
  • [26] A taxonomy of standards in the service sector: Theoretical discussion and empirical test
    Blind, Knut
    SERVICE INDUSTRIES JOURNAL, 2006, 26 (04): : 397 - 420
  • [27] JUSTIFY AND LEGITIMIZE AUDITING IN SOCIETY: THEORETICAL DISCUSSION AND EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS
    Machado Almeida, Bruno Jose
    REVISTA CONTABILIDADE E CONTROLADORIA-RC C, 2018, 10 (01): : 85 - 102
  • [28] JOB RATE RANGES - A THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS - DISCUSSION
    DERBER, M
    INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 1964, 17 (04): : 598 - 611
  • [29] PAIN ASSESSMENT IN CHILDREN - THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL VALIDITY
    VILLARRUEL, AM
    DENYES, MJ
    ADVANCES IN NURSING SCIENCE, 1991, 14 (02) : 32 - 41
  • [30] A theoretical and empirical assessment of stomatal optimization modeling
    Wang, Yujie
    Sperry, John S.
    Anderegg, William R. L.
    Venturas, Martin D.
    Trugman, Anna T.
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2020, 227 (02) : 311 - 325