Economic assessment and ranking of wind power potential using fuzzy-TOPSIS approach

被引:0
|
作者
Muhammad Mohsin
Jijian Zhang
Rahman Saidur
Huaping Sun
Sadiq Mohammed Sait
机构
[1] Jiangsu University,School of Finance and Economics
[2] Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University,School of Business Administration
[3] Sunway University,Research Centre for Nano
[4] King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals,Materials and Energy Technology (RCNMET), School of Science and Technology
[5] CCITR-RI,CoRE
[6] King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals,RE, Research Institute
关键词
Renewable energy; Economic assessment; Fuzzy-TOPSIS; Wind power potential; Weibull distribution; Power law;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, we proposed integrated tools to evaluate the wind power potential, economic viability, and prioritize 15 proposed sites for the installation of wind farms. Initially, we used modified Weibull distribution model coupled with power law to assess the wind power potential. Secondly, we employed value cost method to estimate per unit cost ($/kWh) of proposed sites. Lastly, we used Fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (F-TOPSIS) to rank the best alternatives. The results indicate that Pakistan has enormous wind power potential that cost varies from 0.06 $/kWh to 0.58 $/kWh; thus, sites S12, S13, S14, and S15 are considered as the most economic viable locations for the installation of wind power project, while remaining sites are considered to be less important, due to other complexities. The further analysis using Fuzzy-TOPSIS method reveals that site S13 is the most optimal location followed by S12, S14, and S14 for the development of wind power project. We proposed that government should formulate wind power policy for the implementation of wind power projects in order to meet energy demand of the country.
引用
收藏
页码:22494 / 22511
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multi Characteristics Optimization of Laser Drilling Process Parameter Using Fuzzy-TOPSIS Method
    Priyadarshini, M.
    Tripathy, P. P.
    Mishra, D.
    Panda, S.
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2017, 4 (08) : 8538 - 8547
  • [32] Validation of agile methodology as ideal software development process using Fuzzy-TOPSIS method
    Govil, Nikhil
    Sharma, Ashish
    ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2022, 168
  • [33] RETRACTED ARTICLE: Validation of portfolio allocation in NPD: fuzzy-TOPSIS and COPRAS-grey approach
    Mahesh Caisucar
    Amey Naik Dessai
    Gajesh Usgaonkar
    International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2021, 12 : 37 - 43
  • [34] Z-TOPSIS Approach for Performance Assessment using Fuzzy Similarity
    Khalif, Ku Muhammad Naim Ku
    Gegov, Alexander
    Abu Bakar, Ahmad Syafadhli
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE), 2017,
  • [35] Technical and economic assessment of wind power potential of Nooriabad, Pakistan
    Zahid Hussain Hulio
    Wei Jiang
    S. Rehman
    Energy, Sustainability and Society, 7
  • [36] Technical and economic assessment of wind power potential of Nooriabad, Pakistan
    Hulio, Zahid Hussain
    Jiang, Wei
    Rehman, S.
    ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY AND SOCIETY, 2017, 7
  • [37] Ranking of components for reliability estimation of CBSS using fuzzy TOPSIS
    Tyagi, Kirti
    Sharma, Arun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEM ASSURANCE ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 7 (01) : 41 - 49
  • [38] Risk Assessment and Ranking of Metals Using FDAHP and TOPSIS
    Hayaty, M.
    Mohammadi, M. R. Tavakoli
    Rezaei, A.
    Shayestehfar, M. R.
    MINE WATER AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 33 (02) : 157 - 164
  • [39] Evaluating the strategies for sustainable energy planning in Pakistan: An integrated SWOT-AHP and Fuzzy-TOPSIS approach
    Solangi, Yasir Ahmed
    Tan, Qingmei
    Mirjat, Nayyar Hussain
    Ali, Sharafat
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 236
  • [40] Ranking of barriers for effective maintenance by using TOPSIS approach
    Singh, Rajesh Kumar
    Gupta, Ayush
    Kumar, Ashok
    Khan, Tasmeem Ahmad
    JOURNAL OF QUALITY IN MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING, 2016, 22 (01) : 18 - 34