Monitoring of coastal and transitional waters under the E.U. Water Framework Directive

被引:0
|
作者
J. G. Ferreira
C. Vale
C. V. Soares
F. Salas
P. E. Stacey
S. B. Bricker
M. C. Silva
J. C. Marques
机构
[1] IMAR-DCEA,IMAR – Institute of Marine Research
[2] Fac. Ciências e Tecnologia,Departamento de Ecología e Hidrología, Facultad de Biología
[3] IPIMAR – Instituto de Investigação das Pescas e do Mar,Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection
[4] Instituto Hidrográfico,NOAA – National Ocean Service
[5] Campus Universitario de Espinardo,IMAR – Institute of Marine Research, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia
[6] Bureau of Water Management,undefined
[7] National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science,undefined
[8] LNEC – Laboratório de Engenharia Civil,undefined
[9] Universidade de Coimbra,undefined
来源
关键词
Coastal waters; Estuary; Transitional waters; Surveillance monitoring; Operational monitoring; Investigative monitoring; E.U. Water Framework Directive; 2000/60/EC; U.S. Clean Water Act; Management; MONAE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A set of guidelines are presented for the definition of monitoring plans in coastal and transitional (estuarine and lagoonal) systems subject to the European Union Water Framework Directive – WFD (2000/60/EC). General principles of best practice in monitoring are outlined, including (a) the definition of three types of broad management objectives: water quality, conservation, and human use, to which the general public may easily relate. These will define the core and research indicators (WFD quality elements) to be used for monitoring; (b) priorities and optimisation in a (financially and logistically) resource-constrained environment; (c) quality assurance; and (d) assessment of monitoring success: this should focus on the outputs, i.e. the internal audit of the monitoring activity, and on the outcomes. The latter component assesses programme effectiveness, i.e. environmental success based on a set of clearly-defined targets, and informs management action. The second part of this work discusses the approach and actions to be carried out for implementing WFD surveillance, operational and investigative monitoring. Appropriate spatial and temporal scales for surveillance monitoring of different indicators are suggested, and operational monitoring is classified into either screening or verification procedures, with an emphasis on the relationship between drivers, pressure, state and response. WFD investigative monitoring is interpreted as applied research, and thus guidelines cannot be prescriptive, except insofar as to provide examples of currently acceptable approaches. Specific case studies are presented for both operational (coastal eutrophication control) and investigative monitoring (harmful algal blooms), in order to illustrate the practical application of these monitoring guidelines. Further information is available at http://www.monae.org/.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 216
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Chemical monitoring activity for the implementation of the Water Framework Directive
    Quevauviller, Philippe
    Carere, Mario
    Polesello, Stefano
    [J]. TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2012, 36 : 11 - 11
  • [42] The monitoring of opportunistic macroalgal blooms for the water framework directive
    Scanlan, C. M.
    Foden, J.
    Wells, E.
    Best, M. A.
    [J]. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2007, 55 (1-6) : 162 - 171
  • [43] Phytoplankton pigments and epifluorescence microscopy as tools for ecological status assessment in coastal and estuarine waters, within the Water Framework Directive
    Seoane, Sergio
    Garmendia, Maialen
    Revilla, Marta
    Borja, Angel
    Franco, Javier
    Orive, Emma
    Valencia, Victoriano
    [J]. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2011, 62 (07) : 1484 - 1497
  • [44] Defining types of running waters in Germany using benthic algae: A prerequisite for monitoring according to the Water Framework Directive
    Julia Foerster
    Antje Gutowski
    Jochen Schaumburg
    [J]. Journal of Applied Phycology, 2004, 16 : 407 - 418
  • [45] Multicriteria analysis of water management under the Water Framework Directive
    Mesa, P.
    Martin-Ortega, J.
    Berbel, J.
    [J]. ECONOMIA AGRARIA Y RECURSOS NATURALES, 2008, 8 (02): : 105 - 126
  • [46] Defining types of running waters in Germany using benthic algae: A prerequisite for monitoring according to the Water Framework Directive
    Foerster, J
    Gutowski, A
    Schaumburg, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY, 2004, 16 (05) : 407 - 418
  • [47] Policy tools for agricultural nonpoint source water pollution control in the U.S. and E.U.
    Drevno, Ann
    [J]. MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2016, 27 (02) : 106 - 123
  • [48] A Comparative Analysis of Marine Water Uses in Italian Coastal Municipalities under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive
    Boschetto, R. G.
    Capriolo, A.
    Mascolo, R. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ACCOUNTING AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 12 (03) : 311 - 326
  • [49] Satellite-based products for monitoring optically complex inland waters in support of EU Water Framework Directive
    Alikas, Krista
    Kangro, Kersti
    Randoja, Reiko
    Philipson, Petra
    Asukuell, Elar
    Pisek, Jan
    Reinart, Anu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 36 (17) : 4446 - 4468
  • [50] Peculiarities of the Water Framework Directive implementation in the Canary Islands' superficial waters
    Del Barrio, I.
    Alvarez, R.
    Santana, I.
    Briz, O.
    Bordon, R.
    Hernandez, J.
    Gonzalez, N.
    [J]. Environmental Problems in Coastal Regions VI: Including Oil Spill Studies, 2006, 88 : 447 - 455