Relationship between top executive compensation and corporate governance: evidence from large Italian listed companies

被引:2
|
作者
Nannicini A. [1 ]
Ferraz D.P. [1 ]
Lopes I.T. [2 ]
机构
[1] NOVA School of Business and Economics, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon
[2] Business Research Unit (BRU-IUL), Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Lisbon
关键词
Corporate governance; Executive compensation; Family firms; Italy; Remuneration committee;
D O I
10.1057/s41310-018-0050-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The modernization of corporate governance aims the alignment of the interests of managers with those of companies, promoting a new discipline of internal controls and risk analysis with an enforcement of shareholder rights of information. This research investigates the impact of corporate governance variables—ownership, board of directors and remuneration committee—on executive compensation. A balanced sample of 52 Italian listed companies has been adopted to test the hypotheses, covering 55.98% and 47.13% of market capitalization in 2011 and 2015, respectively, and including 669 board members. Theoretical models evidence a certain stability of compensation schemes for Italian managers over time. Findings suggest that there is a statistically significant positive effect of familiar ownership on the amount of compensation. Along with the nature of ownership, the number of directors in the remuneration committee appointed by minorities assumes a determinant role. With statistical significance, it affects negatively the compensation level, but, contrarily to best practices, it affects negatively the adoption of forms of incentive compensation. © 2018, Springer Nature Limited.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 209
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ownership Structure as Corporate Governance Mechanism: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies
    Jian Chen
    [J]. Economics of Planning, 2001, 34 : 53 - 72
  • [32] Ownership structure as corporate governance mechanism: Evidence from Chinese listed companies
    Chen, J
    [J]. ECONOMICS OF PLANNING, 2001, 34 (1-2): : 53 - 72
  • [33] Corporate Governance and Capital Structure Decisions: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies
    Vijavakumaran, Sunitha
    Vijavakumaran, Ratnam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2019, 6 (03): : 67 - 79
  • [34] Corporate Governance Mechanisms and the Financial Reporting: Evidence from Bangladesh Listed Companies
    Alam, Md Faisul
    Butel, Lynne
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT, LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE (ICMLG 2016), 2016, : 417 - 423
  • [35] Changes in corporate governance and top executive turnover: The evidence from Japan
    Miyajima, Hideaki
    Ogawa, Ryo
    Saito, Takuji
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE AND INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIES, 2018, 47 : 17 - 31
  • [36] Corporate governance reforms and executive compensation determination: Evidence from the UK
    Girma, Sourafel
    Thompson, Steve
    Wright, Peter W.
    [J]. MANCHESTER SCHOOL, 2007, 75 (01): : 65 - 81
  • [37] The relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance characteristics in Malaysian public listed companies
    Said, Roshima
    Zainuddin, Yuserrie Hj
    Haron, Hasnah
    [J]. SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL, 2009, 5 (02) : 212 - +
  • [38] Executive compensation, firm performance, and corporate governance in China: Evidence from firms listed in the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges
    Kato, Takao
    Long, Cheryl
    [J]. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND CULTURAL CHANGE, 2006, 54 (04) : 945 - 983
  • [39] The relation between corporate governance mechanisms, executive compensation and audit fees: Evidence from Iran
    Salehi, Mahdi
    Tarighi, Hossein
    Safdari, Samaneh
    [J]. MANAGEMENT RESEARCH REVIEW, 2018, 41 (08): : 939 - 967
  • [40] Corporate Sustainability and Executive Compensation: An Analysis in Companies Listed on B3
    Pereira da Silva, Annandy Raquel
    Soares Nascimento, Italo Carlos
    Moreira, Caritsa Scartaty
    Varela de Melo, Geison Calyo
    [J]. REUNIR-REVISTA DE ADMINISTRACAO CONTABILIDADE E SUSTENTABILIDADE, 2022, 12 (01): : 75 - 86