Performance of superconducting quantum computing chips under different architecture designs

被引:0
|
作者
Wei Hu
Yang Yang
Weiye Xia
Jiawei Pi
Enyi Huang
Xin-Ding Zhang
Hua Xu
机构
[1] Kunfeng Quantum Technology Co.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Quantum Engineering and Quantum Materials, School of Physics and Telecommunication Engineering
[2] Ltd,undefined
[3] Yiwei Quantum Technology Co.,undefined
[4] Ltd,undefined
[5] Hefei City,undefined
[6] South China Normal University,undefined
关键词
Quantum computation; Quantum chip architecture; Performance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Existing and near-term quantum computers can only perform two-qubit gating operations between physically connected qubits. Research has been done on compilers to rewrite quantum programs to match hardware constraints. However, the quantum processor architecture, in particular the qubit connectivity and topology, still lacks enough discussion, while it potentially has a huge impact on the performance of the quantum algorithms. We perform a quantitative and comprehensive study on the quantum processor performance under different qubit connectivity and topology. We select ten representative design models with different connectivities and topologies from quantum architecture design space and benchmark their performance by running a set of standard quantum algorithms. It is shown that a high-performance architecture almost always comes with a design with large connectivity, while the topology shows a weak influence on the performance in our experiment. Different quantum algorithms show different dependence on quantum chip connectivity and topologies. This work provides quantum computing researchers with a systematic approach to evaluating their processor design.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Architecture of a quantum computing platform
    Ismagilov, Marat
    Sayfutdinov, Rustam
    Vasiliev, Alexander
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SIMULATION IN PHYSICS AND BEYOND, 2019, 1163
  • [22] Layered Architecture for Quantum Computing
    Jones, N. Cody
    Van Meter, Rodney
    Fowler, Austin G.
    McMahon, Peter L.
    Kim, Jungsang
    Ladd, Thaddeus D.
    Yamamoto, Yoshihisa
    PHYSICAL REVIEW X, 2012, 2 (03):
  • [23] Programmable architecture for quantum computing
    Chen, Jialin
    Wang, Lingli
    Charbon, Edoardo
    Wang, Bin
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2013, 88 (02):
  • [24] Hamiltonian quantum computing with superconducting qubits
    Ciani, A.
    Terhal, B. M.
    DiVincenzo, D. P.
    QUANTUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 4 (03)
  • [25] Superconducting system for adiabatic quantum computing
    Corato, V.
    Roscilde, T.
    Ruggiero, B.
    Granata, C.
    Silvestrini, P.
    7TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SUPERCONDUCTIVITY (EUCAS'05), 2006, 43 : 1401 - 1404
  • [26] The future of quantum computing with superconducting qubits
    Bravyi, Sergey
    Dial, Oliver
    Gambetta, Jay M.
    Gil, Dario
    Nazario, Zaira
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 2022, 132 (16)
  • [27] Simulation of superconducting cavities for quantum computing
    Park, Seong Hyeon
    An, Junyoung
    Bang, Jeseok
    Hahn, Seungyong
    PROGRESS IN SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND CRYOGENICS, 2019, 21 (03): : 22 - 26
  • [28] Perspective on superconducting qubit quantum computing
    Olivier Ezratty
    The European Physical Journal A, 59
  • [29] Quantum computing with many superconducting qubits
    You, JQ
    Tsai, JS
    Nori, F
    NEW DIRECTIONS IN MESOSCOPIC PHYSICS (TOWARDS NANOSCIENCE), 2003, 125 : 351 - 360
  • [30] Perspective on superconducting qubit quantum computing
    Ezratty, Olivier
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL A, 2023, 59 (05):