Performance of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in prodromal Huntington disease

被引:0
|
作者
Ji-In Kim
Jeffrey D Long
James A Mills
Nancy Downing
Janet K Williams
Jane S Paulsen
机构
[1] Carver College of Medicine,Department of Psychiatry
[2] The University of Iowa,Department of Biostatistics
[3] College of Public Health,Department of Neurology
[4] The University of Iowa,Department of Psychology
[5] College of Nursing,undefined
[6] The University of Iowa,undefined
[7] Carver College of Medicine,undefined
[8] The University of Iowa,undefined
[9] The University of Iowa,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), recommends the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 for routine clinical use. We tested the utility of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in prodromal Huntington disease. Using data from 726 participants and 630 companions over a 3-year follow-up, linear mixed models were fitted to test (1) baseline and longitudinal differences by progression group; (2) participant and companion differences within each group; and (3) sensitivity of the 12-item WHODAS in comparison to the 36-item WHODAS and the Total Functional Capacity (TFC) score from the Unified Huntington’s Disease Rating Scale. Participants showed baseline group differences whereas companions showed baseline and longitudinal group differences. Companions reported worse functional decline over time than participants as the disease progresses. The 12-item WHODAS detected longitudinal change better than the 36-item WHODAS and the TFC in the medium progression group. Results suggest the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 can detect baseline and longitudinal differences in prodromal HD and may be useful in HD clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:1584 / 1587
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Psychometric properties and a latent class analysis of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in a pooled dataset of community samples
    MacLeod, Melissa A.
    Tremblay, Paul F.
    Graham, Kathryn
    Bernards, Sharon
    Rehm, Jurgen
    Wells, Samantha
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (04) : 243 - 254
  • [22] Patient- and proxy-perceptions on functioning after stroke rehabilitation using the 12-item WHODAS 2.0: a longitudinal cohort study
    Kilkki, Mia
    Stolt, Minna
    Rannikko, Sunna
    Pasanen, Miko
    Tarvonen-Schroder, Sinikka
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024, 46 (04) : 783 - 792
  • [23] Inter-rater reliability, standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 and four performance tests in institutionalized ambulatory older adults
    Silva, Anabela G.
    Cerqueira, Margarida
    Santos, Ana Raquel
    Ferreira, Catarina
    Alvarelhao, Joaquim
    Queiros, Alexandra
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2019, 41 (03) : 366 - 373
  • [24] Psychometric Properties and Validation of the Polish Version of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in Patients with Huntington's Disease
    Cwirlej-Sozanska, Agnieszka
    Sozanski, Bernard
    Kupczyk, Mateusz
    Leszczak, Justyna
    Kwolek, Andrzej
    Wilmowska-Pietruszynska, Anna
    Wisniowska-Szurlej, Agnieszka
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (05) : 1 - 14
  • [25] Minimal important difference of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in persons with chronic low back pain
    Wong, Jessica J.
    Hogg-Johnson, Sheilah
    De Groote, Wouter
    Cwirlej-Sozanska, Agnieszka
    Garin, Olatz
    Ferrer, Montse
    Acuna, angels Pont
    Cote, Pierre
    CHIROPRACTIC & MANUAL THERAPIES, 2023, 31 (01)
  • [26] Mapping the 12-item World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) onto the assessment of quality of life (AQoL)-4D utilities
    Ma, Bernice Hua
    Chen, Gang
    Badji, Samia
    Petrie, Dennis
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2024, 33 (02) : 411 - 422
  • [27] Mapping the 12-item World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) onto the assessment of quality of life (AQoL)-4D utilities
    Bernice Hua Ma
    Gang Chen
    Samia Badji
    Dennis Petrie
    Quality of Life Research, 2024, 33 : 411 - 422
  • [28] Minimal important difference of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in persons with chronic low back pain
    Jessica J. Wong
    Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
    Wouter De Groote
    Agnieszka Ćwirlej-Sozańska
    Olatz Garin
    Montse Ferrer
    Àngels Pont Acuña
    Pierre Côté
    Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 31
  • [29] Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the 12-item Arabic World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) as a screening tool for Syrian refugees
    Akhtar, Aemal
    Cuijpers, Pim
    Morina, Naser
    Sijbrandij, Marit
    Bryant, Richard
    BJPSYCH OPEN, 2021, 7 (06):
  • [30] Psychometric properties of the 12-item WHODAS applied through phone survey: an experience in PERSIAN Traffic Cohort
    Shahedifar, Nasrin
    Sadeghi-Bazargani, Homayoun
    Asghari-Jafarabadi, Mohammad
    Farahbakhsh, Mostafa
    Bazargan-Hejazi, Shahrzad
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2022, 20 (01)