Analysis of actuator delay and its effect on uncertainty quantification for real-time hybrid simulation

被引:0
|
作者
Cheng Chen
Weijie Xu
Tong Guo
Kai Chen
机构
[1] San Francisco State University,School of Engineering
[2] Southeast University,Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures of the Ministry of Education
关键词
real-time hybrid simulation; actuator delay; polynomial chaos expansion; delay differential equation; uncertainty quantification;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Uncertainties in structure properties can result in different responses in hybrid simulations. Quantification of the effect of these uncertainties would enable researchers to estimate the variances of structural responses observed from experiments. This poses challenges for real-time hybrid simulation (RTHS) due to the existence of actuator delay. Polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) projects the model outputs on a basis of orthogonal stochastic polynomials to account for influences of model uncertainties. In this paper, PCE is utilized to evaluate effect of actuator delay on the maximum displacement from real-time hybrid simulation of a single degree of freedom (SDOF) structure when accounting for uncertainties in structural properties. The PCE is first applied for RTHS without delay to determine the order of PCE, the number of sample points as well as the method for coefficients calculation. The PCE is then applied to RTHS with actuator delay. The mean, variance and Sobol indices are compared and discussed to evaluate the effects of actuator delay on uncertainty quantification for RTHS. Results show that the mean and the variance of the maximum displacement increase linearly and exponentially with respect to actuator delay, respectively. Sensitivity analysis through Sobol indices also indicates the influence of the single random variable decreases while the coupling effect increases with the increase of actuator delay.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 725
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Testing Platform and Delay Compensation Methods for Distributed Real-Time Hybrid Simulation
    H. L. Sadraddin
    M. Cinar
    X. Shao
    M. Ahmed
    Experimental Techniques, 2020, 44 : 787 - 805
  • [32] Testing Platform and Delay Compensation Methods for Distributed Real-Time Hybrid Simulation
    Sadraddin, H. L.
    Cinar, M.
    Shao, X.
    Ahmed, M.
    EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 44 (06) : 787 - 805
  • [33] Uncertainty Quantification for Real-Time Operation of Electromagnetic Actuators
    Mach, Frantisek
    Pospisil, Karel
    PROGRESS IN INDUSTRIAL MATHEMATICS AT ECMI 2018, 2019, 30 : 597 - 603
  • [34] Compensation of actuator dynamics in real-time hybrid tests
    Bonnet, P. A.
    Williams, M. S.
    Blakeborough, A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART I-JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND CONTROL ENGINEERING, 2007, 221 (I2) : 251 - 264
  • [35] Time delay measurement in a real-time simulation environment
    Univ of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Chattanooga, United States
    Trans Soc Comput Simul, 3 (127-140):
  • [36] Time delay measurement in a real-time simulation environment
    Dumas, JD
    Klee, HI
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE SOCIETY FOR COMPUTER SIMULATION, 1997, 14 (03): : 127 - 140
  • [37] Bayesian hybrid analytics for uncertainty analysis and real-time crop management
    Meenken, Esther D.
    Triggs, Christopher M.
    Brown, Hamish E.
    Sinton, Sarah
    Bryant, Jeremy R.
    Noble, Alasdair D. L.
    Espig, Martin
    Sharifi, Mostafa
    Wheeler, David M.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2021, 113 (03) : 2491 - 2505
  • [38] Online Stability Analysis for Real-Time Hybrid Simulation Testing
    Galmez, Cristobal
    Fermandois, Gaston
    FRONTIERS IN BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 6
  • [39] Real-Time Simulation of Hybrid Microgrid for Islanding Detection Analysis
    Harikrishna, M.
    Jena, Premalata
    2016 IEEE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER SYSTEMS (ICPS), 2016,
  • [40] Actuator dynamics compensation for real-time hybrid simulation: an adaptive approach by means of a nonlinear estimator
    Strano, Salvatore
    Terzo, Mario
    NONLINEAR DYNAMICS, 2016, 85 (04) : 2353 - 2368