Assessing the seismic response of existing RC buildings using the extended N2 method

被引:0
|
作者
C. Bhatt
R. Bento
机构
[1] Technical University of Lisbon,Instituto Superior Técnico
来源
关键词
Seismic assessment; 3D pushover analysis; Extended N2 method; Real plan-asymmetric buildings; Torsion;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Extensive studies have confirmed the good performance of the N2 method, recommended by Eurocode8, when performing pushover analyses in regular structures. However, this procedure shows lack of accuracy in predicting the torsional motion of plan-asymmetric buildings. In order to overcome this problem, Peter Fajfar and his team have proposed an extension of the method based on a combination of a pushover analysis and of an elastic response spectrum analysis. Since definitive answers about this topic have not yet been reached, this paper intends to proceed the study applying the extended N2 method to real existing RC buildings. Three real plan-asymmetric buildings with three, five and eight storeys were assessed. The results obtained with the extended N2 method were compared with the ones evaluated by means of the original N2 and with the nonlinear dynamic analysis through the use of semi-artificial ground motions. The analyses were performed for different seismic intensities in order to evaluate the torsional response of the building through different stages of structural inelasticity. The results obtained show that the extended N2 method generally reproduces in a very good fashion the real torsional behavior of the analyzed buildings. The conclusions herein outlined, added to the ones already published by the aforementioned authors, seem to confirm that the extended N2 method can be introduced in the next version of Eurocode8 as a nonlinear static procedure capable of accurately predicting the torsional response of plan-asymmetric buildings.
引用
收藏
页码:1183 / 1201
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Seismic risk of existing buildings: A multidisciplinary method
    Malchoul, Nisrine B.
    Munier, Bertrand
    PROTECTION OF HISTORICAL BUILDINGS - PROHITECH 09, VOL 1 AND 2, 2009, : 1503 - 1506
  • [22] A generalized method for seismic evaluation of existing buildings
    Rai, Durgesh C.
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2008, 94 (03): : 363 - 370
  • [23] A performance based approach for the seismic assessment and rehabilitation of existing RC buildings
    Negro, Paolo
    Mola, Elena
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2017, 15 (08) : 3349 - 3364
  • [24] Influence of the constructive features of RC existing buildings in their ductility and seismic performance
    Requena-Garcia-Cruz, Maria-Victoria
    Morales-Esteban, Antonio
    Durand-Neyra, Percy
    Zapico-Blanco, Beatriz
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2021, 19 (01) : 377 - 401
  • [25] The investigation of seismic performance of existing RC buildings with and without infill walls
    Dilmac, Hakan
    Ulutas, Hakan
    Tekeli, Hamide
    Demir, Fuat
    COMPUTERS AND CONCRETE, 2018, 22 (05): : 439 - 447
  • [26] Shear devices coupling exoskeleton and existing RC buildings for seismic improvement
    Comodini, Fabrizio
    Fulco, Alessando
    Mezzi, Marco
    XIX ANIDIS CONFERENCE, SEISMIC ENGINEERING IN ITALY, 2023, 44 : 1076 - 1083
  • [27] A performance based approach for the seismic assessment and rehabilitation of existing RC buildings
    Paolo Negro
    Elena Mola
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 15 : 3349 - 3364
  • [28] Neural network based model for seismic assessment of existing RC buildings
    Caglar, Naci
    Garip, Zehra Sule
    COMPUTERS AND CONCRETE, 2013, 12 (02): : 229 - 241
  • [29] Seismic Fragility Evaluation of Existing RC Frame and URM Buildings in Algeria
    Mustapha Remki
    Abderrahmane Kibboua
    Djillali Benouar
    Fouad Kehila
    International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2018, 16 : 845 - 856
  • [30] Influence of the constructive features of RC existing buildings in their ductility and seismic performance
    Maria-Victoria Requena-Garcia-Cruz
    Antonio Morales-Esteban
    Percy Durand-Neyra
    Beatriz Zapico-Blanco
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2021, 19 : 377 - 401