Outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancer: An analysis from the veterans affairs national surgical quality improvement program

被引:0
|
作者
Kevin G. Billingsley
Kwan Hur
William G. Henderson
Jennifer Daley
Shukri F. Khuri
Richard H. Bell
机构
[1] VA Puget Sound Health Care System and the University of Washington,Department of Surgery
[2] Hines VA Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center,Tenet Health System
[3] University of Colorado Health Outcomes Program,Department of Surgery
[4] Harvard Medical School,Department of Surgery
[5] Center for Health System Design and Evaluation Institute for Health Policy,undefined
[6] VA Boston Healthcare System,undefined
[7] Feinberg School of Medicine,undefined
[8] Northwestern University,undefined
[9] VA Puget Sound Health Care System,undefined
来源
关键词
Pancreatic neoplasms; surgery; adverse effects; postoperative complications;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study is to define the risk factors that predict adverse outcomes for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancer in the Department of Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (VA). The VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program prospectively collected data on 462 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy in 123 VA medical centers from 1990 to 2000. Independent variables included 68 preoperative and 12 intraoperative variables. The main outcome measures were 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity, as measured by a set of 20 pre-defined complications. Predictive models for 30-day morbidity and mortality were constructed using logistic regression analysis. The 30-day morbidity rate was 45.9% (212/462). The 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 9.3% (43/462). Significant predictors of mortality included: preoperative serum albumin, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, preoperative bilirubin >20mg/dl, and operative time. The use of preoperative biliary tract instrumentation did not predict postoperative death or septic complications. This study provides a set of preoperative risk factors that are predictive of adverse outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy. These factors may assist in patient selection for this procedure and are likely to facilitate risk-adjusted comparison of pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes between different health care systems.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 491
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Veterans Administration-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program - Reply
    Wu, CL
    Rowlingson, AJ
    Fleisher, LA
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2005, 30 (03) : 312 - 313
  • [22] Cholecystectomy Outcomes in the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2006-2017)
    Randall, James A.
    Chen, Sheena
    Brody, Fred
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 31 (03): : 251 - 260
  • [23] A National Clinical Quality Program for Veterans Affairs Catheterization Laboratories (from the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program)
    Maddox, Thomas M.
    Plomondon, Mary E.
    Petrich, Megan
    Tsai, Thomas T.
    Gethoffer, Hans
    Noonan, Gregory
    Gillespie, Brian
    Box, Tamara
    Fihn, Stephen D.
    Jesse, Robert L.
    Rumsfeld, John S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 114 (11): : 1750 - 1757
  • [24] Frailty Index Associated With Postoperative Complications and Mortality After Lower Extremity Amputation: A Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis
    Tse, Wayne
    Dittman, James
    Lavingia, Kedar S.
    Amendola, Michael F.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 72 (01) : E12 - E12
  • [25] Comparison of complications after radical and partial nephrectomy: Results from the National Veterans Administration Surgical Quality Improvement Program
    Corman, JM
    Penson, DF
    Hur, K
    Khuri, SF
    Daley, J
    Henderson, W
    Krieger, JN
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 86 (07) : 782 - 789
  • [26] Comparison of complications after radical and partial nephrectomy: results from the National Veterans Administration Surgical Quality Improvement Program
    Sells, H
    McInerney, P
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 88 (01) : 126 - 126
  • [27] Postoperative and amputation-free survival outcomes after femorodistal bypass grafting surgery: Findings from the department of veterans affairs national surgical quality improvement program
    Feinglass, J
    Pearce, WH
    Martin, GJ
    Gibbs, J
    Cowper, D
    Sorensen, M
    Khuri, S
    Daley, J
    Henderson, WG
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 34 (02) : 283 - 290
  • [28] Successful implementation of the department of Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: The patient safety in surgery study
    Khuri, Shukri F.
    Henderson, William G.
    Daley, Jennifer
    Jonasson, Olga
    Jones, R. Scott
    Campbell, Darrell A., Jr.
    Fink, Aaron S.
    Mentzer, Robert M., Jr.
    Neumayer, Leigh
    Hammermeister, Karl
    Mosca, Cecilia
    Healey, Nancy
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 248 (02) : 329 - 336
  • [29] Readmission After Craniotomy for Tumor: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis
    Dasenbrock, Hormuzdiyar H.
    Yan, Sandra C.
    Smith, Timothy R.
    Valdes, Pablo A.
    Gormley, William B.
    Claus, Elizabeth B.
    Dunn, Ian F.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 80 (04) : 551 - 562
  • [30] Outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic malignancy in octogenarians: an American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis
    Lee, David Y.
    Schwartz, Jamie A.
    Wexelman, Barbara
    Kirchoff, Daniel
    Yang, Kevin C.
    Attiyeh, Fadi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 207 (04): : 540 - 548