Risk scores for predicting outcomes in valvular heart disease: How useful?

被引:54
|
作者
Mack M.J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Health Care System, Heart Hospital Baylor Plano, Plano, TX 75093
关键词
Aortic stenosis; Aortic valve replacement; Risk algorithms; Transcatheter aortic valve implantation; Valve disease;
D O I
10.1007/s11886-010-0167-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Risk scoring tools have been developed from clinical databases to predict expected patient mortality from cardiac surgical procedures. The risk algorithms have been developed and validated from variables that have been demonstrated to be predictive of mortality. At least six risk models have been developed from different databases measuring outcomes of cardiac surgery. These algorithms have then been used to select very high risk patients for conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) who would be appropriate candidates for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The two most common risk models used for TAVI selection are the logistic EuroSCORE (LES) and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS-PROM) algorithms. Although both models are accurate in predicting mortality in low-risk patients, the LES has been clearly demonstrated to overpredict expected mortality by a factor of three in high-risk candidates for AVR. Various factors that also impact mortality but are not included in either algorithm include liver disease, frailty, porcelain aorta, and previous radiation. Despite these shortcomings, risk algorithms are effective models for predicting risk, with the STS-PROM being more accurate in high-risk patients. Ultimately, a new risk algorithm specific for TAVI will need to be developed once sufficient databases are developed. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 112
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Valvular heart disease 3 Valvular aspects of rheumatic heart disease
    Remenyi, Boglarka
    ElGuindy, Ahmed
    Smith, Sidney C., Jr.
    Yacoub, Magdi
    Holmes, David R., Jr.
    [J]. LANCET, 2016, 387 (10025): : 1335 - 1346
  • [42] Impact of biological sex on valvular heart disease, interventions, and outcomes
    Wiens, Evan J.
    Kawa, Kristal
    Kass, Malek
    Shah, Ashish H.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2024,
  • [43] CMR in Evaluating Valvular Heart Disease Diagnosis, Severity, and Outcomes
    Myerson, Saul G.
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2021, 14 (10) : 2020 - 2032
  • [44] Valvular heart disease: improved procedural success and prediction of outcomes
    Luscher, Thomas F.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 41 (08) : 899 - 902
  • [45] Are predictive risk scores useful?
    Fuster, Valentin
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 6 (08) : 493 - 493
  • [46] Are predictive risk scores useful?
    Valentin Fuster
    [J]. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 2009, 6 : 493 - 493
  • [47] HCC Risk Scores: Useful or Not?
    Sherman, Morris
    [J]. SEMINARS IN LIVER DISEASE, 2017, 37 (04) : 287 - 295
  • [48] MAGGIC and STS Risk Scores are Equivalent Predictors of Mortality Following Valvular Heart Surgery
    Zhuo, David X.
    Bilchick, Kenneth C.
    Johnston, Lily E.
    Kim, Michelle M.
    Mazimba, Sula
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2017, 23 (08) : S133 - S133
  • [49] Predicting the risk of coronary heart disease
    Dent, Tom
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2010, 47 : S34 - S34
  • [50] Valvular Heart Disease
    Kisling, Adam
    Gallagher, Robert
    [J]. PRIMARY CARE, 2024, 51 (01): : 95 - 109