Risk scores for predicting outcomes in valvular heart disease: How useful?

被引:54
|
作者
Mack M.J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Health Care System, Heart Hospital Baylor Plano, Plano, TX 75093
关键词
Aortic stenosis; Aortic valve replacement; Risk algorithms; Transcatheter aortic valve implantation; Valve disease;
D O I
10.1007/s11886-010-0167-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Risk scoring tools have been developed from clinical databases to predict expected patient mortality from cardiac surgical procedures. The risk algorithms have been developed and validated from variables that have been demonstrated to be predictive of mortality. At least six risk models have been developed from different databases measuring outcomes of cardiac surgery. These algorithms have then been used to select very high risk patients for conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) who would be appropriate candidates for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The two most common risk models used for TAVI selection are the logistic EuroSCORE (LES) and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS-PROM) algorithms. Although both models are accurate in predicting mortality in low-risk patients, the LES has been clearly demonstrated to overpredict expected mortality by a factor of three in high-risk candidates for AVR. Various factors that also impact mortality but are not included in either algorithm include liver disease, frailty, porcelain aorta, and previous radiation. Despite these shortcomings, risk algorithms are effective models for predicting risk, with the STS-PROM being more accurate in high-risk patients. Ultimately, a new risk algorithm specific for TAVI will need to be developed once sufficient databases are developed. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 112
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk Scores in Valvular Heart Disease Interventions
    Casalino, Ricardo
    Tarassoutchi, Flavio
    [J]. ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2012, 98 (05) : E84 - E86
  • [2] Clinical scores and risk factors to predict patient outcomes: how useful are they?
    Chong, K. C.
    Chan, S. Y.
    Jia, Katherine M.
    [J]. HONG KONG MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 24 (06) : 552 - 553
  • [3] Stroke and bleeding risk scores in patients with atrial fibrillation and valvular heart disease: evaluating 'valvular heart disease' in a nationwide cohort study
    Lip, Gregory Y. H.
    Jensen, Martin
    Melgaard, Line
    Skjoth, Flemming
    Nielsen, Peter Bronnum
    Larsen, Torben Bjerregaard
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2019, 21 (01): : 33 - 40
  • [4] Predicting outcomes: Is there utility in risk scores?
    Wijeysundera, Duminda N.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2016, 63 (02): : 148 - 158
  • [5] An update on genetic risk scores for coronary artery disease: are they useful for predicting disease risk and guiding clinical decisions?
    Lieb, Wolfgang
    Vasan, Ramachandran S.
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2020, 18 (08) : 443 - 447
  • [6] How reliable are polygenic risk scores for risk prediction in patients with heart disease?
    Jacob, Erin O.
    Hegele, Robert A.
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 23 (02) : 105 - 107
  • [7] Bleeding scores in hemophilia: are they useful in predicting severity and clinical outcomes
    Borhany, M.
    Fatima, N.
    Abid, M.
    Shamsi, T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2016, 14 : 53 - 53
  • [8] Is pulse pressure useful in predicting risk for coronary heart disease? The Framingham Heart Study
    Franklin, SS
    Khan, SA
    Wong, ND
    Larson, MG
    Levy, D
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1999, 100 (04) : 354 - 360
  • [9] How Useful Are Psychometric Scores in Predicting Recidivism for Treated Sex Offenders?
    Barnett, Georgia D.
    Wakeling, Helen C.
    Mandeville-Norden, Rebecca
    Rakestrow, Janine
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2012, 56 (03) : 420 - 446
  • [10] How useful is imaging in predicting outcomes in stroke rehabilitation?
    Stinear, Cathy M.
    Ward, Nick S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2013, 8 (01) : 33 - 37