Social epistemology;
Medical epistemology;
Industry-funded science;
The Russo–Williamson thesis;
Translational medicine;
Inductive risk;
Epistemic risk;
Infertility;
Epistemic injustice;
Disorder of sex development internal morality;
Medical ethics;
Clinical decision-making;
Implicit trust;
D O I:
暂无
中图分类号:
学科分类号:
摘要:
Philosophy of medicine has traditionally examined two issues: the scientific ontology for medicine and the epistemic significance of the types of evidence used in medical research. In answering each question, philosophers have typically brought to bear tools from traditional analytic philosophy. In contrast, this volume explores medical knowledge from the perspective offered by social epistemology. While many of the same issues are addressed, the approach to these issues generates both fresh questions and new insights into old debates. In addition, the broader purview offered by social epistemology opens up opportunities to address new topics such as the role of consensus conferences, epistemic injustice, the value of medical knowledge, continuing medical education, and industry funding. This article situates and summarizes the contributions to this special issue.
机构:
Georgetown Univ, Sch Foreign Serv, Inst Study Int Migrat, Washington, DC 20057 USAGeorgetown Univ, Sch Foreign Serv, Inst Study Int Migrat, Washington, DC 20057 USA