High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on patient quality of life in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Haohan Yu
Xudong Zhao
Xiaoxia Wu
Jing Yang
Jun Wang
Lijuan Hou
机构
[1] Beijing Normal University,College of P.E and Sports
[2] Beijing Normal University,Faculty of Psychology
[3] Beijing Normal University,State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning
[4] First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University,Department of respiratory and critical care medicine
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on the quality of life (QOL) and mental health (MH) of patients with cardiovascular disease (CVDs). Web of Science, Medline, Embase, Cochrane (CENTRAL), CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and China Science and Technology Journal databases were searched from their date of establishment to July, 2023. A total of 5798 articles were screened, of which 25 were included according to the eligibility criteria. The weighted mean difference (WMD) and standardized mean difference (SMD) were used to analyze data from the same and different indicator categories, respectively. The fixed-effects model (FE) or random-effects model (RE) combined data based on the between-study heterogeneity. There were no statistically significant differences regarding QOL, physical component summary (PCS), mental component summary (MCS), and MH, including depression and anxiety levels, between the HIIT and MICT groups [SMD = 0.21, 95% confidence interval (CI)  − 0.18–0.61, Z = 1.06, P = 0.290; SMD = 0.10, 95% CI  − 0.03–0.23, Z = 1.52, P = 0.128; SMD = 0.07, 95% CI  − 0.05–0.20, Z = 1.13, P = 0.25; SMD = − 0.08, 95% CI  − 0.40–0.25, Z = − 0.46, P = 0.646; WMD = 0.14. 95% CI  − 0.56–0.84, Z = 0.39, P = 0.694, respectively]. HIIT significantly improved PCS in the coronary artery disease (CAD) population subgroup relative to MICT. HIIT was also significantly superior to MICT for physical role, vitality, and social function. We conclude that HIIT and MICT have similar effects on QOL and MH in patients with CVD, while HIIT is favorable for improving patients’ self-perceived physiological functioning based on their status and social adjustment, and this effect is more significant in patients with CAD.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on patient quality of life in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yu, Haohan
    Zhao, Xudong
    Wu, Xiaoxia
    Yang, Jing
    Wang, Jun
    Hou, Lijuan
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [2] The Impact of High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Vascular Function: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ramos, Joyce S.
    Dalleck, Lance C.
    Tjonna, Arnt Erik
    Beetham, Kassia S.
    Coombes, Jeff S.
    [J]. SPORTS MEDICINE, 2015, 45 (05) : 679 - 692
  • [3] Effectiveness of High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training in Hypertensive Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Juliana Moraes Leal
    Leony Morgana Galliano
    Fabrício Boscolo Del Vecchio
    [J]. Current Hypertension Reports, 2020, 22
  • [4] The Impact of High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Vascular Function: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Joyce S. Ramos
    Lance C. Dalleck
    Arnt Erik Tjonna
    Kassia S. Beetham
    Jeff S. Coombes
    [J]. Sports Medicine, 2015, 45 : 679 - 692
  • [5] Effectiveness of High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training in Hypertensive Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Leal, Juliana Moraes
    Galliano, Leony Morgana
    Del Vecchio, Fabricio Boscolo
    [J]. CURRENT HYPERTENSION REPORTS, 2020, 22 (03)
  • [6] High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Okamura, Masatsugu
    Shimizu, Masashi
    Yamamoto, Shuhei
    Nishie, Kenichi
    Konishi, Masaaki
    [J]. HEART FAILURE REVIEWS, 2023, 28 (05) : 1113 - 1128
  • [7] High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Masatsugu Okamura
    Masashi Shimizu
    Shuhei Yamamoto
    Kenichi Nishie
    Masaaki Konishi
    [J]. Heart Failure Reviews, 2023, 28 : 1113 - 1128
  • [8] High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gomes-Neto, Mansueto
    Duraes, Andre R.
    Correia dos Reis, Helena F.
    Neves, Victor R.
    Martinez, Bruno P.
    Carvalho, Vitor O.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 24 (16) : 1696 - 1707
  • [9] Acute effect of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on appetite perception: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hu, Mingzhu
    Nie, Jinlei
    Lei, On Kei
    Shi, Qingde
    Kong, Zhaowei
    [J]. APPETITE, 2023, 182
  • [10] High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training in the Prevention/Management of Cardiovascular Disease
    Hussain, Syed R.
    Macaluso, Andrea
    Pearson, Stephen J.
    [J]. CARDIOLOGY IN REVIEW, 2016, 24 (06) : 273 - 281