High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:111
|
作者
Gomes-Neto, Mansueto [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Duraes, Andre R. [2 ]
Correia dos Reis, Helena F. [1 ,3 ]
Neves, Victor R. [5 ]
Martinez, Bruno P. [1 ,3 ]
Carvalho, Vitor O. [3 ,4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Bahia, Phys Therapy Dept, Salvador, BA, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Bahia, Programa Posgrad Med & Saude, Salvador, BA, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Bahia, Physiotherapy Res Grp, Salvador, BA, Brazil
[4] GREAT Grp Grp Estudos ATividade Fis, Salvador, BA, Brazil
[5] State Univ Pernambuco, Phys Therapy Dept, Pernambuco, Brazil
[6] Univ Fed Sergipe, Phys Therapy Dept, Lagarto, SE, Brazil
关键词
Coronary artery disease; exercise; rehabilitation; CHRONIC HEART-FAILURE; AEROBIC INTERVAL; CARDIAC REHABILITATION; PULMONARY REHABILITATION; AMERICAN-ASSOCIATION; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; GUIDELINES; PRESCRIPTION; PREVENTION; CARDIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1177/2047487317728370
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Exercise is an effective strategy for reducing total and cardiovascular mortality in patients with coronary artery disease. However, it is not clear which modality is best. We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the effects of high-intensity interval versus moderate-intensity continuous training of coronary artery disease patients. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, PEDro, LILACS, SciELO and the Cochrane Library (from the earliest date available to November 2016) for controlled trials that evaluated the effects of high-intensity interval versus moderate-intensity continuous training for coronary artery disease patients. Weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I-2 test. Results: Twelve studies met the study criteria, including 609 patients. High-intensity interval training resulted in improvement in peak oxygen uptake weighted mean difference (1.3ml/kg/min, 95% confidence interval: 0.6-1.9, n=594) compared with moderate-intensity continuous training. No significant difference in physical, emotional, and social domain of quality of life was found for participants for participants in the high-intensity interval training group compared with the moderate-intensity continuous training group. Sub-analysis of three studies with isocaloric exercise training showed no significant difference in peak oxygen uptake weighted mean difference (0.4ml/kg/min, 95% confidence interval: -0.1-0.9, n=137) for participants in the high-intensity interval training group compared with moderate-intensity continuous training group. Conclusions: High-intensity interval training may improve peak oxygen uptake and should be considered as a component of care of coronary artery disease patients. However, this superiority disappeared when isocaloric protocol is compared.
引用
收藏
页码:1696 / 1707
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on patient quality of life in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Haohan Yu
    Xudong Zhao
    Xiaoxia Wu
    Jing Yang
    Jun Wang
    Lijuan Hou
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 13 (1)
  • [2] High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on patient quality of life in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yu, Haohan
    Zhao, Xudong
    Wu, Xiaoxia
    Yang, Jing
    Wang, Jun
    Hou, Lijuan
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [3] Effectiveness of High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training in Hypertensive Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Juliana Moraes Leal
    Leony Morgana Galliano
    Fabrício Boscolo Del Vecchio
    [J]. Current Hypertension Reports, 2020, 22
  • [4] Effectiveness of High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training in Hypertensive Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Leal, Juliana Moraes
    Galliano, Leony Morgana
    Del Vecchio, Fabricio Boscolo
    [J]. CURRENT HYPERTENSION REPORTS, 2020, 22 (03)
  • [5] High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Okamura, Masatsugu
    Shimizu, Masashi
    Yamamoto, Shuhei
    Nishie, Kenichi
    Konishi, Masaaki
    [J]. HEART FAILURE REVIEWS, 2023, 28 (05) : 1113 - 1128
  • [6] High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Masatsugu Okamura
    Masashi Shimizu
    Shuhei Yamamoto
    Kenichi Nishie
    Masaaki Konishi
    [J]. Heart Failure Reviews, 2023, 28 : 1113 - 1128
  • [7] The Impact of High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Vascular Function: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Joyce S. Ramos
    Lance C. Dalleck
    Arnt Erik Tjonna
    Kassia S. Beetham
    Jeff S. Coombes
    [J]. Sports Medicine, 2015, 45 : 679 - 692
  • [8] The Impact of High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Vascular Function: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ramos, Joyce S.
    Dalleck, Lance C.
    Tjonna, Arnt Erik
    Beetham, Kassia S.
    Coombes, Jeff S.
    [J]. SPORTS MEDICINE, 2015, 45 (05) : 679 - 692
  • [9] Effects of high intensity interval training versus moderate intensity continuous training on exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gu, Shengyuan
    Du, Xinchao
    Wang, Dongwei
    Yu, Yaohua
    Guo, Shifang
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (08):
  • [10] Acute effect of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on appetite perception: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hu, Mingzhu
    Nie, Jinlei
    Lei, On Kei
    Shi, Qingde
    Kong, Zhaowei
    [J]. APPETITE, 2023, 182