Candidate wells selection and ranking based on data mining and multi-criteria decision analysis techniques

被引:0
|
作者
Galicia H.D.P. [1 ]
Reyes E.R. [1 ]
Sheremetov L. [2 ]
机构
[1] TecNM/Instituto Tecnológico de Orizaba, Orizaba
[2] Instituto Mexicano del Petróleo, Mexico
关键词
Candidate wells selection and ranking; Data mining; Genetic algorithm; Oil wells productivity analysis; TOPSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s12517-021-08146-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Different well productivity methodologies have been used by oil companies to improve oil recovery from mature fields. The candidate wells selection and ranking is one of the critical stages of such methodologies, which is used to identify the best candidates among the average performing well stock. In this paper, a data-driven approach for the identification, selection, and ranking of candidate wells for productivity analysis and intervention is proposed. A set of critical variables of the oilfield production system for carbonate oil reservoirs is identified. Data mining techniques are used for data pre-processing and candidate wells selection, while a multi-criteria decision analysis method called Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is applied for wells ranking. The measures borrowed from information retrieval, cumulative gain, and discounted cumulative gain are applied for the ranking of wells under the premise that the first well from the list of candidates has the highest probability of success. A genetic algorithm is proposed to optimize the weights applied in TOPSIS. It is based on a population of chromosomes, each one serving as a feasible solution to the optimization problem. A real-life illustrative example for a mature field operating in the Mesozoic formation and located in southeastern Mexico is presented. By comparing the proposed methodology with the results obtained by an expert panel, applying conventional productivity analysis techniques, we demonstrate that the obtained wells ranking better fits the selected criteria, offering considerable time savings. © 2021, Saudi Society for Geosciences.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An incident information management framework based on data integration, data mining, and multi-criteria decision making
    Peng, Yi
    Zhang, Yong
    Tang, Yu
    Li, Shiming
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2011, 51 (02) : 316 - 327
  • [22] Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to the Selection of Software Measures
    Pacheco Cardenas, Yoan
    COMPUTACION Y SISTEMAS, 2018, 22 (01): : 203 - 213
  • [23] Deep Ranking Analysis by Power Eigenvectors (DRAPE): A wizard for ranking and multi-criteria decision making
    Todeschini, Roberto
    Grisoni, Francesca
    Ballabio, Davide
    CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2019, 191 : 129 - 137
  • [24] Simulation techniques for the sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria decision models
    Butler, J
    Jia, JM
    Dyer, J
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1997, 103 (03) : 531 - 546
  • [25] On the Use of Data Envelopment Analysis for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Pascoe, Sean
    ALGORITHMS, 2024, 17 (03)
  • [26] The New Zealand drug harms ranking study: A multi-criteria decision analysis
    Crossin, Rose
    Cleland, Lana
    Wilkins, Chris
    Rychert, Marta
    Adamson, Simon
    Potiki, Tuari
    Pomerleau, Adam C.
    MacDonald, Blair
    Faletanoai, Dwaine
    Hutton, Fiona
    Noller, Geoff
    Lambie, Ian
    Sheridan, Jane L.
    George, Jason
    Mercier, Kali
    Maynard, Kristen
    Leonard, Louise
    Walsh, Patricia
    Ponton, Rhys
    Bagshaw, Sue
    Muthukumaraswamy, Suresh
    McIntosh, Tracey
    Poot, Edward
    Gordon, Paul
    Sharry, Patrick
    Nutt, David
    Boden, Joseph
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 37 (09) : 891 - 903
  • [27] Trust Blog Ranking Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis AHP and TOPSIS
    Zulkefli, Nurul Akhmal Binti Mohd
    Bin Baharudin, Baharum
    Said, Abas Bin Md
    IT CONVERGENCE AND SECURITY 2017, VOL 2, 2018, 450 : 68 - 76
  • [28] A multi-criteria decision analysis approach for importance identification and ranking of network components
    Almoghathawi, Yasser
    Barker, Kash
    Rocco, Claudio M.
    Nicholson, Charles D.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2017, 158 : 142 - 151
  • [29] Ranking based on optimal points multi-criteria decision-making method
    Zakeri, Shervin
    GREY SYSTEMS-THEORY AND APPLICATION, 2019, 9 (01) : 45 - 69
  • [30] Assigning Cardinal Weights in Multi-Criteria Decision Making Based on Ordinal Ranking
    Alfares, Hesham
    Duffuaa, Salih
    JOURNAL OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2008, 15 (5-6) : 125 - 133