Improved genetic algorithm approach for coordinating decision-making in technological disaster management

被引:0
|
作者
Bethsy Guerrero Granados
Christian G. Quintero M.
César Viloria Núñez
机构
[1] Universidad del Norte,Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering
来源
关键词
Computational intelligence; Technological disaster management; Multi-agent coordination;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The increasing frequency of technological events has resulted in significant damage to the environment, human health, social stability, and economy, driving ongoing scientific development and interest in emergency management (EM). Traditional EM approaches are often inadequate because of incomplete and imprecise information during crises, making fast and effective decision-making challenging. Computational Intelligence techniques (CI) offer decision-supporting capabilities that can effectively address these challenges. However, there is still a need for deeper integration of emerging computational intelligence techniques to support evidence-based decision-making while also addressing gaps in metrics, standards, and protocols for emergency response and scalability. This study presents a coordinated decision-making system for multiple types of emergency case scenarios for technological disaster management based on CI techniques, including an Improved Genetic Algorithm (IGA), and Multi-objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO). The IGA enhances emergency performance by optimizing the task assignment for multiple agents involved in emergency response with coordination mechanisms, resulting in an approximately 15% improvement compared to other state-of-the-art methods. Ultimately, this study offers a promising foundation for future research to develop effective strategies for mitigating the impact of technological disasters on society and the environment.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:4503 / 4521
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Approach to Risk Management Decision-Making in the Small Business
    Myskova, Renata
    Doupalova, Veronika
    INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE: BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT (BEM2015), 2015, 34 : 329 - 336
  • [42] A WHOLE-LIFE APPROACH TO MANAGEMENT DECISION-MAKING
    NAPIER, I
    DAVIES, J
    BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING, 1994, 13 : 62 - 66
  • [43] Decision-making in IT service management: a simulation based approach
    Orta, Elena
    Ruiz, Mercedes
    Hurtado, Nuria
    Gawn, David
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2014, 66 : 36 - 51
  • [44] Equilibration Analysis and Control of Coordinating Decision-Making Populations
    Sakhaei, Negar
    Maleki, Zeinab
    Ramazi, Pouria
    2021 60TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2021, : 4314 - 4319
  • [45] Equilibration Analysis and Control of Coordinating Decision-Making Populations
    Sakhaei, Negar
    Maleki, Zeinab
    Ramazi, Pouria
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2024, 69 (08) : 5065 - 5080
  • [46] IMPROVED DECISION-MAKING FOR SUSTAINABILITY
    HICKS, R
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 1993, 48 (03) : 157 - 157
  • [47] IMPROVED PAROLE DECISION-MAKING
    REED, GJ
    AMOS, WE
    FEDERAL PROBATION, 1972, 36 (01) : 16 - 18
  • [48] Coordinating Decision-Making in Data Management Activities: A Systematic Review of Data Governance Principles
    Brous, Paul
    Janssen, Marijn
    Vilminko-Heikkinen, Riikka
    ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT, EGOV 2016, 2019, 9820 : 115 - 125
  • [49] Improved DEMATEL methodology for effective safety management decision-making
    Yazdi, Mohammad
    Khan, Faisal
    Abbassi, Rouzbeh
    Rusli, Risza
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2020, 127
  • [50] A call to focus on farmer intuition for improved management decision-making
    von Diest, Saskia G.
    Wright, Julia
    Samways, Michael J.
    Kieft, Henk
    OUTLOOK ON AGRICULTURE, 2020, 49 (04) : 278 - 285