Efficiency limits for photoelectrochemical water-splitting

被引:0
|
作者
Katherine T. Fountaine
Hans Joachim Lewerenz
Harry A. Atwater
机构
[1] NG Next,Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences
[2] 1 Space Park Drive,undefined
[3] Deparment of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering,undefined
[4] California Institute of Technology,undefined
[5] California Institute of Technology,undefined
[6] Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis,undefined
[7] California Institute of Technology,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Theoretical limiting efficiencies have a critical role in determining technological viability and expectations for device prototypes, as evidenced by the photovoltaics community’s focus on detailed balance. However, due to their multicomponent nature, photoelectrochemical devices do not have an equivalent analogue to detailed balance, and reported theoretical efficiency limits vary depending on the assumptions made. Here we introduce a unified framework for photoelectrochemical device performance through which all previous limiting efficiencies can be understood and contextualized. Ideal and experimentally realistic limiting efficiencies are presented, and then generalized using five representative parameters—semiconductor absorption fraction, external radiative efficiency, series resistance, shunt resistance and catalytic exchange current density—to account for imperfect light absorption, charge transport and catalysis. Finally, we discuss the origin of deviations between the limits discussed herein and reported water-splitting efficiencies. This analysis provides insight into the primary factors that determine device performance and a powerful handle to improve device efficiency.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Insights into Improving Photoelectrochemical Water-Splitting Performance Using Hematite Anode
    Devi, Hemam Rachna
    Ong, Boon Chong
    Zhao, Xin
    Dong, Zhilli
    Nanda, Karuna Kar
    Chen, Zhong
    ENERGY TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 10 (01)
  • [32] Efficiency of mechano-catalytic water-splitting system
    Ohta, T
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2000, 25 (12) : 1151 - 1156
  • [33] AN EFFICIENCY COMPARISON OF THERMOCHEMICAL AND ELECTROLYTIC WATER-SPLITTING PROCESSES
    ABHOLD, ME
    BABB, AL
    JOHANSON, LN
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1984, 47 : 138 - 139
  • [34] Black Ni-doped TiO2 photoanodes for high-efficiency photoelectrochemical water-splitting
    Liu, Qiang
    Ding, Dongyan
    Ning, Congqin
    Wang, Xuewu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2015, 40 (05) : 2107 - 2114
  • [35] Omnidirectional Au-embedded ZnO/CdS core/shell nanorods for enhanced photoelectrochemical water-splitting efficiency
    Hieu, H. N.
    Nghia, N., V
    Vuong, N. M.
    Van Bui, H.
    CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 56 (28) : 3975 - 3978
  • [36] Surface dependent photoelectrochemical water-splitting performance of zinc tin oxide films
    Setiawan, Ignatius Andre
    Reddy, Vasudeva Reddy Minnam
    Sayed, Mostafa Saad
    Gedi, Sreedevi
    Alhammadi, Salh
    Shim, Jae-Jin
    Kim, Woo Kyoung
    APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE, 2023, 613
  • [37] Catalyst-assisted growth of InGaN NWs for photoelectrochemical water-splitting applications
    P. Sundara Venkatesh
    G. Paulraj
    P. Dharmaraj
    V. Purushothaman
    K. Jeganathan
    Ionics, 2020, 26 : 3465 - 3472
  • [38] Photoelectrochemical Schlenk cell functionalization of multi-junction water-splitting photoelectrodes
    Schmitt, Erica A.
    Guidat, Margot
    Nusshoer, Max
    Renz, Anna-Lena
    Moeller, Kristof
    Flieg, Marco
    Loerch, Daniel
    Koelbach, Moritz
    May, Matthias M.
    CELL REPORTS PHYSICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 4 (10):
  • [39] Surface Modifications of a Vertically Grown Nanostructure for Boosting Photoelectrochemical Water-Splitting Performance
    Choubey, Prashant
    Rani, Raj
    Basu, Mrinmoyee
    ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS, 2024,
  • [40] Benchmarks and Protocols for Electrolytic, Photoelectrochemical, and Solar-Thermal Water-Splitting Technologies
    Boettcher, Shannon W.
    ACS ENERGY LETTERS, 2020, 5 (01): : 70 - 71