Co-benefits of a carbon tax in Nepal

被引:0
|
作者
Shree Raj Shakya
S. Kumar
Ram M. Shrestha
机构
[1] Asian Institute of Technology,Energy Field of Study, School of Environment, Resources and Development
关键词
Carbon tax; Co-benefits; Developing country; Energy security; Greenhouse gas mitigation; MARKAL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper analyzes the co-benefits of introducing a time variant carbon (C) tax scheme in Nepal, a hydropower resourceful country, by using a bottom up integrated energy system model based on the MARKet ALlocation (MARKAL) framework with time horizon of 2005–2050. It discusses the effects of C tax on energy mix, environmental emissions, energy supply security, energy efficiency, energy system cost, and employment benefit. The study shows that the C tax (that gradually increases from US$ 13/tCO2e in 2015 to US$ 200/tCO2e by 2050) results in a reduction of the cumulative emission of greenhouse gases by 83.9 million tons CO2e (12%) as compared to that in the base case. With the introduction of the C tax, there would be a need for additional hydropower capacity of 945 MW by 2050 as compared to the capacity in the base case. The emission of local pollutants consisting of sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx) and non-methane volatile organic compound (NMVOC) in 2050 would be reduced by 12%, 7% and 1% respectively under the C tax scenario. Total amount of imported energy would decrease by 13%, which corresponds to a reduction in discounted net fuel import cost by 5% during the study period. Furthermore, the C tax would result in new employment generation of 151 thousand man-years associated with the additional hydropower capacity requirement.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 101
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Low carbon scenarios for transport in India: Co-benefits analysis
    Dhar, Subash
    Shukla, Priyadarshi R.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 81 : 186 - 198
  • [22] Co-benefits of protecting mangroves for biodiversity conservation and carbon storage
    Md Mizanur Rahman
    Martin Zimmer
    Imran Ahmed
    Daniel Donato
    Mamoru Kanzaki
    Ming Xu
    Nature Communications, 12
  • [23] Co-benefits of black carbon mitigation for climate and air quality
    Harmsen, Mathijs J. H. M.
    van Dorst, Pim
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    van den Berg, Maarten
    Van Dingenen, Rita
    Klimont, Zbigniew
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2020, 163 (03) : 1519 - 1538
  • [24] Willingness to Pay for Carbon Sequestration and Co-Benefits of Forests in Turkey
    Tolunay, Ahmet
    Bassullu, Caglar
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 7 (03) : 3311 - 3337
  • [25] Beyond cost and carbon: The multidimensional co-benefits of low carbon transitions in Europe
    Sovacool, Benjamin K.
    Martiskainen, Mari
    Hook, Andrew
    Baker, Lucy
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 169
  • [26] Co-benefits towards commitments
    不详
    NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2023, 7 (07) : 955 - 955
  • [27] Co-benefits towards commitments
    Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2023, 7 : 955 - 955
  • [28] Mitigating the impacts of air pollutants in Nepal and climate co-benefits: a scenario-based approach
    Amrit M. Nakarmi
    Bikash Sharma
    Utsav S. Rajbhandari
    Anita Prajapati
    Christopher S. Malley
    Johan C. I. Kuylenstierna
    Harry W. Vallack
    Daven K. Henze
    Arnico Panday
    Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 2020, 13 : 361 - 370
  • [29] Optimizing carbon storage and biodiversity co-benefits in reforested riparian zones
    Dybala, Kristen E.
    Steger, Kristin
    Walsh, Robert G.
    Smart, David R.
    Gardali, Thomas
    Seavy, Nathaniel E.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2019, 56 (02) : 343 - 353
  • [30] Designer policy for carbon and biodiversity co-benefits under global change
    Bryan B.A.
    Runting R.K.
    Capon T.
    Perring M.P.
    Cunningham S.C.
    Kragt M.E.
    Nolan M.
    Law E.A.
    Renwick A.R.
    Eber S.
    Christian R.
    Wilson K.A.
    Nature Climate Change, 2016, 6 (3) : 301 - 305