Reclamation project selection using fuzzy decision-making methods

被引:0
|
作者
Mahmut Yavuz
Burcin Lacin Altay
机构
[1] Eskisehir Osmangazi University,Mining Engineering Department
[2] Odak Mining Cooperation,undefined
来源
关键词
Open-pit mining; Reclamation; Multi-attribute decision making; Yager’s method; Fuzzy AHP;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Mining is a very important activity for the local and global economy, but most mining operations inevitably lead to substantial environmental damage. After the mining activity is complete, suitable reclamation policies should be applied to post-mining areas. If possible, reclamation activities should be implemented while mining operations continue. In this study, different reclamation project alternatives prepared by Magnesite Mine Company were evaluated using decision-making methods. To select the most suitable one among these reclamation projects, a decision-making process was prepared. As a branch of Operations Research, decision making is a widely used application in both science and social sciences. There are many different methods developed to solve decision-making problems in the literature. Two different fuzzy decision-making methods, Yager’s method and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method, are employed in this paper. It was concluded that both Yager’s and fuzzy AHP methods may help to solve decision-making problems about reclamation activities in mining.
引用
收藏
页码:6167 / 6179
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Spherical Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making Model for Wind Turbine Supplier Selection in a Renewable Energy Project
    Nguyen, Van Thanh
    Hai, Nguyen Hoang
    Lan, Nguyen Thi Kim
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (03)
  • [42] Fuzzy decision-making for selection of mobile base station location
    Gacovski, Zoran
    Cvetanoski, Ilija
    [J]. ITI 2006: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 28TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INTERFACES, 2006, : 401 - +
  • [43] A FUZZY MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHOD FOR FACILITY SITE SELECTION
    LIANG, GS
    WANG, MJJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 1991, 29 (11) : 2313 - 2330
  • [44] Integrated project evaluation and selection using multiple-attribute decision-making technique
    Dey, Prasanta Kumar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2006, 103 (01) : 90 - 103
  • [45] Landfill site selection by decision-making tools based on fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making method
    Abdolhadi Nazari
    Mohammad Mehdi Salarirad
    Abbas Aghajani Bazzazi
    [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2012, 65 : 1631 - 1642
  • [46] Six-Sigma project selection using national quality award criteria and fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making method
    Yang, Taho
    Hsieh, Chiung-Hsi
    [J]. 2008 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-31, 2008, : 8003 - 8006
  • [47] Landfill site selection by decision-making tools based on fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making method
    Nazari, Abdolhadi
    Salarirad, Mohammad Mehdi
    Bazzazi, Abbas Aghajani
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2012, 65 (06) : 1631 - 1642
  • [48] Green Supplier Selection in the Construction Industry Using a Novel Fuzzy Decision-Making Approach
    Karamoozian, Amirhossein
    Wu, Desheng
    Luo, Cuicui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 149 (06)
  • [49] A Compromised Decision-Making Approach to Third-Party Logistics Selection in Sustainable Supply Chain Using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy VIKOR Methods
    Wang, Chia-Nan
    Nguyen, Ngoc-Ai-Thy
    Dang, Thanh-Tuan
    Lu, Chen-Ming
    [J]. MATHEMATICS, 2021, 9 (08)
  • [50] Decision-making methods based on fuzzy soft competition hypergraphs
    Muhammad Akram
    Sundas Shahzadi
    Areen Rasool
    Musavarah Sarwar
    [J]. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 2022, 8 : 2325 - 2348