Doping Prevalence among US Elite Athletes Subject to Drug Testing under the World Anti-Doping Code

被引:0
|
作者
Davoren, Ann Kearns [1 ]
Rulison, Kelly [1 ]
Milroy, Jeff [2 ]
Grist, Pauline [2 ]
Fedoruk, Matthew [3 ]
Lewis, Laura [3 ]
Wyrick, David [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Prevent Strategies, Greensboro, NC 27412 USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC USA
[3] US Antidoping Agcy USADA, Colorado Springs, CO USA
关键词
Doping prevalence; Performance enhancing drugs; Athletes; RANDOMIZED-RESPONSE; SENSITIVE QUESTIONS;
D O I
10.1186/s40798-024-00721-9
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Background Determining the prevalence of doping within an elite athlete population is challenging due to the extreme sensitivity of the topic; however, understanding true doping prevalence is important when designing anti-doping programs and measuring their effectiveness. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of doping among Olympic, Paralympic, World, and National-level competitive athletes in the United States subject to the World Anti-Doping Code. All athletes who were subject to the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency's Protocol for Olympic and Paralympic Movement Testing, a World Anti-Doping Code ("Code")-compliant anti-doping program, were invited to complete a web-delivered survey. Using a direct questioning approach, the survey items asked athletes whether they had used each specific category of banned substance / method on the World Anti-Doping Agency's Prohibited List. Multiple strategies to encourage honest reporting (e.g., protecting anonymity by collecting minimal demographic information; using an outside organization to administer the survey) and to detect inconsistent responses were used.Results Depending on the method of calculation, 6.5-9.2% of the 1,398 respondents reported using one or more prohibited substances or methods in the 12 months prior to survey administration. Specific doping prevalence rates for each individual substance / method categories ranged from 0.1% (for both diuretics / masking agents and stem cell / gene editing) to 4.2% for in-competition use of cannabinoids.Conclusion Determining the prevalence of doping within different athlete populations is critical so that sport governing bodies can evaluate their anti-doping efforts and better tailor their programming. By measuring doping prevalence of specific categories of substances and methods, rather than just the overall prevalence of doping, this study also highlights where sport governing bodies should focus their future educational and detection efforts. Estimated doping prevalence among U.S. elite athletes ranged from 6.5 to 9.2%.The most prevalent category of doping was in-competition use of cannabinoids (at 4.2%), whereas the least prevalent categories of doping were diuretics or masking agents (0.1%), stem cell or gene editing (0.1%), narcotics (0.2%), and hormone and metabolic modulators (0.2%).Of the athletes who reported doping, most reported using only one substance or method.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Time for change: a roadmap to guide the implementation of the World Anti-Doping Code 2015
    Dvorak, Jiri
    Baume, Norbert
    Botre, Francesco
    Broseus, Julian
    Budgett, Richard
    Frey, Walter O.
    Geyer, Hans
    Harcourt, Peter Rex
    Ho, Dave
    Howman, David
    Isola, Victor
    Lundby, Carsten
    Marclay, Francois
    Peytavin, Annie
    Pipe, Andrew
    Pitsiladis, Yannis P.
    Reichel, Christian
    Robinson, Neil
    Rodchenkov, Grigory
    Saugy, Martial
    Sayegh, Souheil
    Segura, Jordi
    Thevis, Mario
    Vernec, Alan
    Viret, Marjolaine
    Vouillamoz, Marc
    Zorzoli, Mario
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2014, 48 (10) : 801 - 806
  • [32] Managing compliance with the World Anti-Doping Code: China's strategies and their implications
    Tan, Tien-Chin
    Bairner, Alan
    Chen, Yu-Wen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW FOR THE SOCIOLOGY OF SPORT, 2020, 55 (03) : 251 - 271
  • [33] The good, the bad, and the ugly: A qualitative secondary analysis into the impact of doping and anti-doping on clean elite athletes in five European countries
    Martinelli, Laura A.
    Thrower, Sam N.
    Heyes, Andrew
    Boardley, Ian D.
    Backhouse, Susan H.
    Petroczi, Andrea
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORT POLICY AND POLITICS, 2023, 15 (01) : 3 - 22
  • [34] 0 0 A contractual perspective on the strict liability principle in the World Anti-Doping Code
    du Pisani, Annelize
    [J]. DE JURE, 2013, 46 (04) : 917 - 927
  • [35] Elite athletes' duty to provide information on their whereabouts: Justifiable anti-doping work or an indefensible surveillance regime?
    Hanstad, Dag Vidar
    Loland, Sigmund
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SPORT SCIENCE, 2009, 9 (01) : 3 - 10
  • [36] The role of comprehensive education in anti-doping policy legitimacy and support among clean athletes
    Barkoukis, Vassilis
    Mallia, Luca
    Lazuras, Lambros
    Ourda, Despoina
    Agnello, Sara
    Andjelkovic, Marija
    Bochaver, Konstantin
    Folkers, Dirk
    Bondarev, Dmitriy
    Dikic, Nenad
    Dreiskaemper, Dennis
    Petroczi, Andrea
    Strauss, Bernd
    Zelli, Arnaldo
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY OF SPORT AND EXERCISE, 2022, 60
  • [37] The World Anti-Doping Code 2015: ASSER International Sports Law Blog symposium
    Duval A.
    Ram H.
    Viret M.
    Wisnosky E.
    Jacobs H.L.
    Morgan M.
    [J]. The International Sports Law Journal, 2016, 16 (1-2) : 99 - 117
  • [38] The status quo before the International Standard for Education: Elite adolescent athletes' perceptions of anti-doping education
    Gatterer, Katharina
    Streicher, Bernhard
    Petroczi, Andrea
    Overbye, Marie
    Schobersberger, Wolfgang
    Gumpenberger, Matthias
    Weber, Kathrin
    Koenigstein, Karsten
    Blank, Cornelia
    [J]. PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT & HEALTH, 2021, 9 (3-4)
  • [39] Racing Clean in a Tainted World: A Qualitative Exploration of the Experiences and Views of Clean British Elite Distance Runners on Doping and Anti-Doping
    Shelley, Jake
    Thrower, Sam N.
    Petroczi, Andrea
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [40] Doping and drug testing: Anti-doping work must be transparent and adhere to good scientific practices to ensure public trust
    Boye, Erik
    Skotland, Tore
    Osterud, Bjarne
    Nissen-Meyer, Jon
    [J]. EMBO REPORTS, 2017, 18 (03) : 351 - 354