Doping Prevalence among US Elite Athletes Subject to Drug Testing under the World Anti-Doping Code

被引:0
|
作者
Davoren, Ann Kearns [1 ]
Rulison, Kelly [1 ]
Milroy, Jeff [2 ]
Grist, Pauline [2 ]
Fedoruk, Matthew [3 ]
Lewis, Laura [3 ]
Wyrick, David [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Prevent Strategies, Greensboro, NC 27412 USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC USA
[3] US Antidoping Agcy USADA, Colorado Springs, CO USA
关键词
Doping prevalence; Performance enhancing drugs; Athletes; RANDOMIZED-RESPONSE; SENSITIVE QUESTIONS;
D O I
10.1186/s40798-024-00721-9
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Background Determining the prevalence of doping within an elite athlete population is challenging due to the extreme sensitivity of the topic; however, understanding true doping prevalence is important when designing anti-doping programs and measuring their effectiveness. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of doping among Olympic, Paralympic, World, and National-level competitive athletes in the United States subject to the World Anti-Doping Code. All athletes who were subject to the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency's Protocol for Olympic and Paralympic Movement Testing, a World Anti-Doping Code ("Code")-compliant anti-doping program, were invited to complete a web-delivered survey. Using a direct questioning approach, the survey items asked athletes whether they had used each specific category of banned substance / method on the World Anti-Doping Agency's Prohibited List. Multiple strategies to encourage honest reporting (e.g., protecting anonymity by collecting minimal demographic information; using an outside organization to administer the survey) and to detect inconsistent responses were used.Results Depending on the method of calculation, 6.5-9.2% of the 1,398 respondents reported using one or more prohibited substances or methods in the 12 months prior to survey administration. Specific doping prevalence rates for each individual substance / method categories ranged from 0.1% (for both diuretics / masking agents and stem cell / gene editing) to 4.2% for in-competition use of cannabinoids.Conclusion Determining the prevalence of doping within different athlete populations is critical so that sport governing bodies can evaluate their anti-doping efforts and better tailor their programming. By measuring doping prevalence of specific categories of substances and methods, rather than just the overall prevalence of doping, this study also highlights where sport governing bodies should focus their future educational and detection efforts. Estimated doping prevalence among U.S. elite athletes ranged from 6.5 to 9.2%.The most prevalent category of doping was in-competition use of cannabinoids (at 4.2%), whereas the least prevalent categories of doping were diuretics or masking agents (0.1%), stem cell or gene editing (0.1%), narcotics (0.2%), and hormone and metabolic modulators (0.2%).Of the athletes who reported doping, most reported using only one substance or method.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The World Anti-Doping Code 2003 -: Consequences for physicians associated with elite athletes
    Striegel, H
    Rössner, D
    Simon, P
    Niess, AM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2005, 26 (03) : 238 - 243
  • [2] Athletes' rights under the World Anti-Doping Code: A legitimate public interest?
    Goldsworthy, Daniel
    [J]. ALTERNATIVE LAW JOURNAL, 2018, 43 (03) : 197 - 202
  • [3] Evolution of the world anti-doping code
    Young, Richard
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 249
  • [4] The prevalence of doping among Saudi athletes: Results from the National Anti-Doping Program
    Aljaloud, Sulaiman O.
    Khoshhal, Khalid, I
    Al-Ghaiheb, Abdullatif A.
    Konbaz, Mohammed S.
    Almasaed, Abdulaziz A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TAIBAH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 15 (01): : 19 - 24
  • [5] The World Anti-Doping Code: Truths and Wrongs
    Gepdiremen, Akcahan
    [J]. BEZMIALEM SCIENCE, 2018, 6 (04): : 301 - 304
  • [6] Achieving compliance in international anti-doping policy: An analysis of the 2009 World Anti-Doping Code
    Houlihan, Barrie
    [J]. SPORT MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2014, 17 (03) : 265 - 276
  • [7] Anti-doping and legitimacy: an international survey of elite athletes' perceptions
    Efverstrom, Anna
    Ahmadi, Nader
    Hoff, David
    Backstrom, Asa
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORT POLICY AND POLITICS, 2016, 8 (03) : 491 - 514
  • [8] The World Anti-Doping Code: can you have asthma and still be an elite athlete?
    Fitch, Ken
    [J]. BREATHE, 2016, 12 (02) : 149 - 158
  • [9] Russian twister and the World Anti-Doping Code: time to shun the elitist paradigm of anti-doping regime
    Dasgupta L.
    [J]. The International Sports Law Journal, 2017, 17 (1-2) : 4 - 14
  • [10] The World Anti-Doping Code in sport Update for 2015
    Hughes, David
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN PRESCRIBER, 2015, 38 (05) : 167 - 170