EEG dynamics reveal a dissociation between storage and selective attention within working memory

被引:0
|
作者
Eren Günseli
Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort
Dirk van Moorselaar
Konstantinos Christos Daoultzis
Martijn Meeter
Christian N. L. Olivers
机构
[1] Columbia University,
[2] Department of Psychology,undefined
[3] Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam,undefined
[4] Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology,undefined
[5] Institute for Brain and Behavior Amsterdam,undefined
[6] Panteion University,undefined
[7] Department of Psychology,undefined
[8] Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam,undefined
[9] LEARN! Research Institute,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Selective attention plays a prominent role in prioritizing information in working memory (WM), improving performance for attended representations. However, it remains unclear whether unattended WM representations suffer from information loss. Here we tested the hypothesis that within WM, selectively attending to an item and stopping storing other items are independent mechanisms. We recorded EEG while participants performed a WM recall task in which the item most likely to be tested was cued retrospectively during retention. By manipulating retro-cue reliability (i.e., the ratio of valid to invalid cue trials), we varied the incentive to retain non-cued items. Storage and selective attention in WM were measured during the retention interval by contralateral delay activity (CDA) and contralateral alpha power suppression, respectively. Soon after highly reliable cues, the cued item was attended, and non-cued items suffered information loss. However, for less reliable cues, initially the cued item was attended, but unattended items were kept in WM. Later during the delay, previously unattended items suffered information loss despite now attention being reallocated to their locations, presumably to strengthen their weakening traces. These results show that storage and attention in WM are distinct processes that can behave differently depending on the relative importance of representations.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Spatial Attention in Serial Order Working Memory: An EEG Study
    Rasoulzadeh, Vesal
    Sahan, Muhammet Ikbal
    van Dijck, Jean-Philippe
    Abrahamse, Elger
    Marzecova, Anna
    Verguts, Tom
    Fias, Wim
    [J]. CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2021, 31 (05) : 2482 - 2493
  • [42] Binding facilitates attention switching within working memory
    Bao, Min
    Li, Zhi-Hao
    Zhang, Da-Ren
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2007, 33 (05) : 959 - 969
  • [43] Storage interference in working memory cannot be removed by attention
    Lu, Ruoyu
    Li, Zeyu
    Yan, Chenyu
    Wang, Tengfei
    Li, Zhi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2024, 136
  • [44] Memory and attention: A double dissociation between memory encoding and memory retrieval
    Mulligan, Neil W.
    Spataro, Pietro
    West, John T.
    [J]. COGNITION, 2023, 238
  • [45] Controlled attention and storage: An investigation of the relationship between working memory, short-term memory, scope of attention, and intelligence in children
    Kuhn, Joerg-Tobias
    [J]. LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2016, 52 : 167 - 177
  • [46] Focusing on Attention: The Effects of Working Memory Capacity and Load on Selective Attention
    Ahmed, Lubna
    de Fockert, Jan W.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (08):
  • [47] Selective attention in schizophrenia: Relationship to verbal working memory
    Carter, CS
    Barch, DM
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1998, 43 : 113S - 113S
  • [48] Selective attention in schizophrenia: relationship to verbal working memory
    Barch, DM
    Carter, CS
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 1998, 33 (1-2) : 53 - 61
  • [49] Auditory selective attention under working memory load
    Rena Bayramova
    Enrico Toffalini
    Mario Bonato
    Massimo Grassi
    [J]. Psychological Research, 2021, 85 : 2667 - 2681
  • [50] Auditory selective attention under working memory load
    Bayramova, Rena
    Toffalini, Enrico
    Bonato, Mario
    Grassi, Massimo
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2021, 85 (07): : 2667 - 2681