Public willingness to pay for eradicating a harmful marine organism: the case of Aurelia aurita in South Korea

被引:0
|
作者
Ju-Hee Kim
Se-Jun Jin
Seung-Hoon Yoo
机构
[1] Seoul National University of Science & Technology,Department of Future Energy Convergence, College of Creativity and Convergence Studies
[2] Ocean Science and Technology Policy Research Section,undefined
[3] Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology,undefined
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2022年 / 29卷
关键词
Harmful marine organism; Eradication; Willingness to pay; Contingent valuation; Zero observations;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Aurelia aurita (AA), a legally registered harmful marine organism in South Korea, is damaging marine human leisure activities, local residents’ tourism income, fisheries, and cooling water intake at power plants. The government is therefore seeking to eradicate AA by removing AA-attached larvae (polyps). This article looks into the public willingness to pay (WTP) for the eradication, utilizing a contingent valuation. For the sake of eliciting the WTP response, the one-and-one-half-bounded (OB) model was adopted. For comparison, the single-bounded (SB) model, which uses only the response to the first question in the OB model, was also applied. A spike model with a considerable plausibility that could explicitly deal with zero WTP responses was employed. Consequently, the estimation results of the SB model were used for further policy analysis. The household average WTP was estimated as KRW 3,911 (USD 3.49) per year, securing statistical significance. The national value was KRW 80.46 billion (USD 71.71 million) per annum. This figure can be interpreted as public value of the AA eradication project and used as essential basic data to evaluate the economic feasibility of implementing the project. Some factors such as income and education level significantly positively affected the intention of paying a suggested bid.
引用
收藏
页码:88839 / 88851
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Consumer perceptions of climate change and willingness to pay for mandatory implementation of low carbon labels: the case of South Korea
    Kim, Hyeyoung
    House, Lisa A.
    Kim, Tae-Kyun
    INTERNATIONAL FOOD AND AGRIBUSINESS MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2016, 19 (04): : 129 - 144
  • [22] Willingness to pay for the prevention of beach erosion in Korea: The case of Haeundae beach
    Choi, Eun Chul
    Lee, Joo Suk
    Chang, Jeong-In
    MARINE POLICY, 2021, 132
  • [23] Willingness to pay for a second-generation bioethanol: A case study of Korea
    Mamadzhanov, Alisher
    McCluskey, Jill J.
    Li, Tongzhe
    ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 127 : 464 - 474
  • [24] Public willingness to pay for mitigating local conflicts over the construction of renewable energy facilities: A contingent valuation study in South Korea
    Choi, Jihye
    Kim, Justine Jihyun
    Lee, Jongsu
    ENERGY POLICY, 2024, 185
  • [25] Public willingness to pay for endocrine disrupting chemicals-free labelling policy in Korea
    Kim, Hyo-Jin
    Lee, Hye-Jeong
    Yoo, Seung-Hoon
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2019, 51 (02) : 131 - 140
  • [26] Estimating willingness to pay for renewable energy in South Korea using the contingent valuation method
    Lee, Chul-Yong
    Heo, Hyejin
    ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 94 : 150 - 156
  • [27] Income, environmental quality and willingness to pay for organic food: a regional analysis in South Korea
    Kim, Cherry
    Kim, Kwansoo
    HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 11 (01):
  • [28] Households' Willingness to Pay for Interactive Charging Stations for Vehicle to Grid System in South Korea
    Kim, Ju-Hee
    Hyun, Min-Ki
    Yoo, Seung-Hoon
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (15)
  • [29] Public preferences and willingness to pay for social inclusion programmes: The Spanish case
    Gonzalez Hernandez, Matias M.
    Lam Gonzalez, Yen E.
    CIRIEC-ESPANA REVISTA DE ECONOMIA PUBLICA SOCIAL Y COOPERATIVA, 2021, 103 : 225 - 248
  • [30] Willingness to Pay and Public Acceptance for Hydrogen Buses: A Case Study of Perugia
    Bigerna, Simona
    Polinori, Paolo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 7 (10) : 13270 - 13289