A comparative study for the estimation of geodetic point velocity by artificial neural networks

被引:0
|
作者
M YILMAZ
M GULLU
机构
[1] Afyon Kocatepe University,Department of Geomatics, Faculty of Engineering
来源
关键词
Geodetic point velocity; artificial neural networks; back propagation; radial basis function; Kriging.;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Space geodesy era provides velocity information which results in the positioning of geodetic points by considering the time evolution. The geodetic point positions on the Earth’s surface change over time due to plate tectonics, and these changes have to be accounted for geodetic purposes. The velocity field of geodetic network is determined from GPS sessions. Velocities of the new structured geodetic points within the geodetic network are estimated from this velocity field by the interpolation methods. In this study, the utility of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) widely applied in diverse fields of science is investigated in order to estimate the geodetic point velocities. Back Propagation Artificial Neural Network (BPANN) and Radial Basis Function Neural Network (RBFNN) are used to estimate the geodetic point velocities. In order to evaluate the performance of ANNs, the velocities are also interpolated by Kriging (KRIG) method. The results are compared in terms of the root mean square error (RMSE) over five different geodetic networks. It was concluded that the estimation of geodetic point velocity by BPANN is more effective and accurate than by KRIG when the points to be estimated are more than the points known.
引用
收藏
页码:791 / 808
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Inversion of a velocity model using artificial neural networks
    Moya, Aaron
    Irikura, Kojiro
    COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2010, 36 (12) : 1474 - 1483
  • [22] Estimation of Student Success with Artificial Neural Networks
    Turhan, Kemal
    Kurt, Burcin
    Engin, Yasemin Zeynep
    EGITIM VE BILIM-EDUCATION AND SCIENCE, 2013, 38 (170): : 112 - 120
  • [23] Forecasting geodetic measurements using finite impulse response artificial neural networks
    Miljanovic, Milos
    Ninkov, Tosa
    Susic, Zoran
    Tucikesic, Sanja
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF GEO-MARINE SCIENCES, 2017, 46 (09) : 1743 - 1750
  • [24] APPROXIMATION AND ESTIMATION BOUNDS FOR ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS
    BARRON, AR
    MACHINE LEARNING, 1994, 14 (01) : 115 - 133
  • [25] Artificial neural networks for parameter estimation in geophysics
    Calderón-Macías, C
    Sen, MK
    Stoffa, PL
    GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2000, 48 (01) : 21 - 47
  • [26] ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS IN PROCESS ESTIMATION AND CONTROL
    WILLIS, MJ
    MONTAGUE, GA
    DIMASSIMO, C
    THAM, MT
    MORRIS, AJ
    AUTOMATICA, 1992, 28 (06) : 1181 - 1187
  • [27] Comparative Study of Artificial Neural Networks and Wavelet Artificial Neural Networks for Groundwater Depth Data Forecasting with Various Curve Fractal Dimensions
    Zhenfang He
    Yaonan Zhang
    Qingchun Guo
    Xueru Zhao
    Water Resources Management, 2014, 28 : 5297 - 5317
  • [28] Comparative Study of Artificial Neural Networks and Wavelet Artificial Neural Networks for Groundwater Depth Data Forecasting with Various Curve Fractal Dimensions
    He, Zhenfang
    Zhang, Yaonan
    Guo, Qingchun
    Zhao, Xueru
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2014, 28 (15) : 5297 - 5317
  • [29] Comparative Study of State-of-Charge Estimation with Recurrent Neural Networks
    Wassiliadis, Nikolaos
    Herrmann, Thomas
    Wildfeuer, Leo
    Reiter, Christoph
    Lienkamp, Markus
    2019 IEEE TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION CONFERENCE AND EXPO (ITEC), 2019,
  • [30] Current velocity forecasting in straits with artificial neural networks, a case study: Strait of Istanbul
    Aydogan, Burak
    Ayat, Berna
    Ozturk, Mehmet N.
    Cevik, Esin Oezkan
    Yuksel, Yalcin
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2010, 37 (5-6) : 443 - 453