A comparative study for the estimation of geodetic point velocity by artificial neural networks

被引:0
|
作者
M YILMAZ
M GULLU
机构
[1] Afyon Kocatepe University,Department of Geomatics, Faculty of Engineering
来源
关键词
Geodetic point velocity; artificial neural networks; back propagation; radial basis function; Kriging.;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Space geodesy era provides velocity information which results in the positioning of geodetic points by considering the time evolution. The geodetic point positions on the Earth’s surface change over time due to plate tectonics, and these changes have to be accounted for geodetic purposes. The velocity field of geodetic network is determined from GPS sessions. Velocities of the new structured geodetic points within the geodetic network are estimated from this velocity field by the interpolation methods. In this study, the utility of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) widely applied in diverse fields of science is investigated in order to estimate the geodetic point velocities. Back Propagation Artificial Neural Network (BPANN) and Radial Basis Function Neural Network (RBFNN) are used to estimate the geodetic point velocities. In order to evaluate the performance of ANNs, the velocities are also interpolated by Kriging (KRIG) method. The results are compared in terms of the root mean square error (RMSE) over five different geodetic networks. It was concluded that the estimation of geodetic point velocity by BPANN is more effective and accurate than by KRIG when the points to be estimated are more than the points known.
引用
收藏
页码:791 / 808
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparative study for the estimation of geodetic point velocity by artificial neural networks
    Yilmaz, M.
    Gullu, M.
    JOURNAL OF EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE, 2014, 123 (04) : 791 - 808
  • [2] ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS PRUNING APPROACH FOR GEODETIC VELOCITY FIELD DETERMINATION
    Yilmaz, Mustafa
    BOLETIM DE CIENCIAS GEODESICAS, 2013, 19 (04): : 558 - 573
  • [3] Prediction of geodetic point velocity using MLPNN, GRNN, and RBFNN models: a comparative study
    Berkant Konakoglu
    Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica, 2021, 56 : 271 - 291
  • [4] Prediction of geodetic point velocity using MLPNN, GRNN, and RBFNN models: a comparative study
    Konakoglu, Berkant
    ACTA GEODAETICA ET GEOPHYSICA, 2021, 56 (02) : 271 - 291
  • [5] A comparative study of parameter estimation in hydrology modelling: Artificial neural networks and curve fitting approaches
    Rajanayaka, C
    Kulasiri, D
    Samarasinghe, S
    MODSIM 2003: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION, VOLS 1-4: VOL 1: NATURAL SYSTEMS, PT 1; VOL 2: NATURAL SYSTEMS, PT 2; VOL 3: SOCIO-ECONOMIC SYSTEMS; VOL 4: GENERAL SYSTEMS, 2003, : 843 - 848
  • [6] A Comparative Approach to Hand Force Estimation using Artificial Neural Networks
    Mobasser, Farid
    Hashtrudi-Zaad, Keyvan
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2012, 4 : 1 - 15
  • [7] ENHANCING HYDROGEN LAMINAR BURNING VELOCITY ESTIMATION WITH ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS AND SIMULATED DATA
    Ambrutis, Andrius
    Povilaitis, Mantas
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2024 31ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING, VOL 11, ICONE31 2024, 2024,
  • [8] A comparative study on artificial neural networks for environmental quality assessment
    Liu, Yijun
    He, Sheng
    Wang, Yao
    Wang, Xiumei
    Computer Modelling and New Technologies, 2014, 18 (07): : 41 - 47
  • [9] Artificial Neural Networks for Finite Capacity Scheduling: A Comparative Study
    Guneri, Ali Fuat
    Gumus, Alev Taskin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND PRACTICE, 2008, 15 (04): : 349 - 359
  • [10] Artificial Neural Networks for (Automotive) Embedded Control - A Comparative Study
    Dominka, Sven
    Smith, Henrik
    Hartmann, Benjamin
    2021 IEEE 11TH ANNUAL COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATION WORKSHOP AND CONFERENCE (CCWC), 2021, : 1489 - 1494