Open mesh versus non-mesh repair of groin hernia meta-analysis of randomized trials leased on individual patient data: The EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration

被引：0

作者：

Grant A.M. ^{[1
,3
]}

Fingerhut A. ^{[2
]}

Go P. ^{[21
]}

Grant A. ^{[1
,3
]}

Kingsnorth A. ^{[3
]}

Merello J. ^{[4
]}

O’dwyer P. ^{[3
]}

Payne J. ^{[5
]}

Grant A. ^{[1
,3
]}

McCormack K. ^{[3
]}

Ross S. ^{[3
]}

Scott N. ^{[3
]}

Vale L. ^{[3
]}

Aitola P. ^{[6
]}

Anderberg B. ^{[7
]}

Arvidsson D. ^{[7
]}

Barkun J. ^{[8
]}

Barth R. ^{[5
]}

Jr. ^{[5
]}

Bay-Nielsen M. ^{[9
]}

Beets G. ^{[21
]}

Bittner R. ^{[10
]}

Bringman S. ^{[7
]}

Callesen T. ^{[9
]}

Castoro C. ^{[11
]}

Dirksen C. ^{[21
]}

Filipi C. ^{[5
]}

Fitzgibbons R. ^{[5
]}

Friis E. ^{[9
]}

Gir Ã O R. ^{[12
]}

Graham P. ^{[3
]}

Hatzitheoklitos E. ^{[13
]}

Hauters P. ^{[14
]}

Heikkinen T. ^{[6
]}

Jeekel H. ^{[21
]}

Johansson B. ^{[7
]}

Juul P. ^{[9
]}

Kald A. ^{[7
]}

Kehlet H. ^{[9
]}

Khoury N. ^{[8
]}

Klingler A. ^{[15
]}

K Ö Ninger J. ^{[10
]}

Kozol R. ^{[5
]}

Leibl B. ^{[10
]}

Macintyre I. ^{[3
]}

Maddern G. ^{[16
]}

McGillicuddy J. ^{[5
]}

Millat B. ^{[2
]}

Nilsson E. ^{[7
]}

Nordin P. ^{[7
]}

机构：

[1] A.M. Grant Health Services Research Unit, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen

来源：

Hernia | 2002年 / 6卷 / 3期

关键词：

Individual patient data meta-analysis; Inguinal hernia; Randomised controlled trial; Synthetic mesh; Systematic review;

D O I：

10.1007/s10029-002-0073-1

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Background. The EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration was established to provide reliable evaluation of newer methods of groin hernia repair. It involved 70 investigators in 20 countries. Materials and methods. Twenty eligible trials (5016 participants) of open mesh vs. non-mesh groin hernia repair were identified. Meta-analysis was performed using raw individual patient data where possible. Results. Fewer hernia recurrences were reported after mesh repair. There were no clear differences between mesh and non-mesh groups in complications. Overall, those in the mesh groups had a shorter hospital stay, quicker return to usual activities and less frequent persisting pain, but individual trial results varied. Conclusions. The review provides strong evidence that open mesh repair is associated with a reduction in the risk of recurrence of between 50% and 75%. There is also some evidence of quicker recovery and of lower rates of persisting pain following open mesh repair. © Springer-Verlag 2002.

引用

页码：130 / 136

页数：6

共 50 条

[11] Open mesh versus non-mesh fascial technique for parastomal hernia repair
Al Shakarchi, J.
Williams, G.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 : 185 - 185
[12] Mesh compared with non-mesh methods of open goin hernia repair:: systematic review of randomized controlled trials and Laparoscopic compared with open methods of groin hernia repair:: systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Slater, GH
Hopkins, G
Bailey, M
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (03) : 470 - 471
[13] Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair
Lockhart, Kathleen
Dunn, Douglas
Teo, Shawn
Ng, Jessica Y.
Dhillon, Manvinder
Teo, Edward
van Driel, Mieke L.
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, (09):
[14] Laparoscopic versus open groin hernia repair: Meta-analysis of randomised trials based on individual patient data
Grant A.M.
Fingerhut A.
Go P.
Grant A.
Kingsnorth A.
Merello J.
O’Dwyer P.
Payne J.
McCormack K.
Ross S.
Scott N.
Vale L.
Aitola P.
Anderberg B.
Arvidsson D.
Barkun J.
Barth Jnr R.
Bay-Nielsen M.
Beets G.
Bittner R.
Bringman S.
Callesen T.
Castoro C.
Dirksen C.
Filipi C.
Fitzgibbons R.
Friis E.
Girão R.
Graham P.
Hatzitheoklitos E.
Hauters P.
Heikkinen T.
Jeekel H.
Johansson B.
Juul P.
Kald A.
Kehlet H.
Khoury N.
Klingler A.
Köninger J.
Kozol R.
Leibl B.
Macintyre I.
Maddern G.
McGillicuddy J.
Millat B.
Nilsson E.
Nordin P.
Paganini A.
Pappalardo G.
Hernia, 2002, 6 (1) : 2 - 10
[15] Open mesh versus suture repair of umbilical hernia: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Shrestha, Donna
Shrestha, Alice
Shrestha, Badri
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 62 : 62 - 66
[16] Randomized clinical trial of non-mesh versus mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia
Vrijland, WW
van den Tol, MP
Luijendijk, RW
Hop, WCJ
Busschbach, JJV
de Lange, DCD
van Geldere, D
Rottier, AB
Vegt, PA
Ijzermans, JNM
Jeekel, J
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 89 (03) : 293 - 297
[17] Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing laparoscopic repair of groin hernia with or without mesh fixation
Eltair, Mokhtar
Hajibandeh, Shahin
Hajibandeh, Shahab
Hanif, Mohamed
Kumar, Yogish
Mobarak, Dham
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 : 31 - 31
[18] Meta-analysis of Prolene Hernia System mesh versus Lichtenstein mesh in open inguinal hernia repair
Sanjay, Pandanaboyana
Watt, David G.
Ogston, Simon A.
Alijani, Afshin
Windsor, John A.
SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2012, 10 (05): : 283 - 289
[19] Open Mesh Techniques for Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Zhao, Gang
Gao, Peng
Ma, Bin
Tian, Jinhui
Yang, Kehu
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2009, 250 (01) : 35 - 42
[20] Antibiotic prophylaxis for open mesh repair of groin hernia: systematic review and meta-analysis
Erdas, E.
Medas, F.
Pisano, G.
Nicolosi, A.
Calo, P. G.
HERNIA, 2016, 20 (06) : 765 - 776

← 1 2 3 4 5 →