Open mesh versus non-mesh repair of groin hernia meta-analysis of randomized trials leased on individual patient data: The EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration

被引：0

作者：

Grant A.M. ^{[1
,3
]}

Fingerhut A. ^{[2
]}

Go P. ^{[21
]}

Grant A. ^{[1
,3
]}

Kingsnorth A. ^{[3
]}

Merello J. ^{[4
]}

O’dwyer P. ^{[3
]}

Payne J. ^{[5
]}

Grant A. ^{[1
,3
]}

McCormack K. ^{[3
]}

Ross S. ^{[3
]}

Scott N. ^{[3
]}

Vale L. ^{[3
]}

Aitola P. ^{[6
]}

Anderberg B. ^{[7
]}

Arvidsson D. ^{[7
]}

Barkun J. ^{[8
]}

Barth R. ^{[5
]}

Jr. ^{[5
]}

Bay-Nielsen M. ^{[9
]}

Beets G. ^{[21
]}

Bittner R. ^{[10
]}

Bringman S. ^{[7
]}

Callesen T. ^{[9
]}

Castoro C. ^{[11
]}

Dirksen C. ^{[21
]}

Filipi C. ^{[5
]}

Fitzgibbons R. ^{[5
]}

Friis E. ^{[9
]}

Gir Ã O R. ^{[12
]}

Graham P. ^{[3
]}

Hatzitheoklitos E. ^{[13
]}

Hauters P. ^{[14
]}

Heikkinen T. ^{[6
]}

Jeekel H. ^{[21
]}

Johansson B. ^{[7
]}

Juul P. ^{[9
]}

Kald A. ^{[7
]}

Kehlet H. ^{[9
]}

Khoury N. ^{[8
]}

Klingler A. ^{[15
]}

K Ö Ninger J. ^{[10
]}

Kozol R. ^{[5
]}

Leibl B. ^{[10
]}

Macintyre I. ^{[3
]}

Maddern G. ^{[16
]}

McGillicuddy J. ^{[5
]}

Millat B. ^{[2
]}

Nilsson E. ^{[7
]}

Nordin P. ^{[7
]}

机构：

[1] A.M. Grant Health Services Research Unit, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen

来源：

Hernia | 2002年 / 6卷 / 3期

关键词：

Individual patient data meta-analysis; Inguinal hernia; Randomised controlled trial; Synthetic mesh; Systematic review;

D O I：

10.1007/s10029-002-0073-1

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Background. The EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration was established to provide reliable evaluation of newer methods of groin hernia repair. It involved 70 investigators in 20 countries. Materials and methods. Twenty eligible trials (5016 participants) of open mesh vs. non-mesh groin hernia repair were identified. Meta-analysis was performed using raw individual patient data where possible. Results. Fewer hernia recurrences were reported after mesh repair. There were no clear differences between mesh and non-mesh groups in complications. Overall, those in the mesh groups had a shorter hospital stay, quicker return to usual activities and less frequent persisting pain, but individual trial results varied. Conclusions. The review provides strong evidence that open mesh repair is associated with a reduction in the risk of recurrence of between 50% and 75%. There is also some evidence of quicker recovery and of lower rates of persisting pain following open mesh repair. © Springer-Verlag 2002.

引用

页码：130 / 136

页数：6

共 50 条

[1] Erratum to: Open mesh versus non-mesh repair of groin hernia: meta-analysis of randomised trials based on individual patient dataThe EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration
A. Grant
Hernia, 2002, 6 (4) : 204 - 204
[2] Mesh versus non-mesh for emergency groin hernia repair
Saeter, Ann Hou
Fonnes, Siv
Li, Shuqing
Rosenberg, Jacob
Andresen, Kristo G. Er
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2023, (11):
[3] Mesh repair versus non-mesh repair for incarcerated and strangulated groin hernia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
P. Marcolin
Sérgio Mazzola Poli de Figueiredo
Vitor Moura Fé de Melo
Sérgio Walmir de Araújo
Marcella Mota Constante
Rui-Min Diana Mao
A. Villasante-Tezanos
R. Lu
Hernia, 2023, 27 : 1397 - 1413
[4] Mesh compared with non-mesh methods of open groin hernia repair:: systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Grant, A
Go, P
Fingerhut, A
Kingsnorth, A
Merello, J
O'Dwyer, P
Payne, J
Scott, N
Webb, K
Ross, S
Aitola, P
Anderberg, B
Arvidsson, D
Barkun, J
Bay-Nielsen, M
Beets, G
Bittner, R
Bringman, S
Castoro, C
Champault, G
Dirksen, C
Filipi, C
Fitzgibbons, R
Girao, R
Hatzitheoklitos, E
Hauters, P
Heikkinen, T
Jeekel, H
Johansson, B
Kald, A
Kehlet, H
Khoury, N
Klingler, A
Kozol, R
Leibl, B
Macintre, I
McGillicuddy, J
Maddern, G
Millat, B
Nilsson, E
Nordin, P
Paganini, A
Papplardo, G
Pedrós, JS
Schmitz, R
Schwarz, A
Shah, S
Simmermacher, R
Sledzinski, Z
Stoker, D
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 87 (07) : 854 - 859
[5] Mesh repair versus non-mesh repair for incarcerated and strangulated groin hernia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Marcolin, P.
de Figueiredo, Sergio Mazzola Poli
de Melo, Vitor Moura Fe
de Araujo, Sergio Walmir
Constante, Marcella Mota
Mao, Rui-Min Diana
Villasante-Tezanos, A.
Lu, R.
HERNIA, 2023, 27 (06) : 1397 - 1413
[6] Mesh Repair Versus Non-Mesh Repair for Strangulated Inguinal Hernia: Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Hassen Hentati
Wajih Dougaz
Chadli Dziri
World Journal of Surgery, 2014, 38 : 2784 - 2790
[7] Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh - Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Grant, AM
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2002, 235 (03) : 322 - 332
[8] Mesh Repair Versus Non-Mesh Repair for Strangulated Inguinal Hernia: Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Hentati, Hassen
Dougaz, Wajih
Dziri, Chadli
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 38 (11) : 2784 - 2790
[9] Emergency groin hernia: outcome after mesh and non-mesh repair
Kumar, Dileep
Wu, Diana
Tan, Brandon
Guilbert, Michael
Muthukumarsamy, Girivasan
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 93 (1-2) : 120 - 124
[10] Lower Risk of Recurrence After Mesh Repair Versus Non-Mesh Sutured Repair in Open Umbilical Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Bisgaard, T.
Kaufmann, R.
Christoffersen, M. W.
Strandfelt, P.
Gluud, L. L.
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 108 (03) : 187 - 193

← 1 2 3 4 5 →