Swine models for translational oncological research: an evolving landscape and regulatory considerations

被引:0
|
作者
Adeline N. Boettcher
Kyle M. Schachtschneider
Lawrence B. Schook
Christopher K. Tuggle
机构
[1] Iowa State University,Department of Animal Science
[2] University of Illinois at Chicago,Department of Radiology
[3] University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics
[4] National Center for Supercomputing Applications,Department of Animal Sciences
[5] University of Illinois at Chicago,undefined
[6] University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,undefined
来源
Mammalian Genome | 2022年 / 33卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Swine biomedical models have been gaining in popularity over the last decade, particularly for applications in oncology research. Swine models for cancer research include pigs that have severe combined immunodeficiency for xenotransplantation studies, genetically modified swine models which are capable of developing tumors in vivo, as well as normal immunocompetent pigs. In recent years, there has been a low success rate for the approval of new oncological therapeutics in clinical trials. The two leading reasons for these failures are either due to toxicity and safety issues or lack of efficacy. As all therapeutics must be tested within animal models prior to clinical testing, there are opportunities to expand the ability to assess efficacy and toxicity profiles within the preclinical testing phases of new therapeutics. Most preclinical in vivo testing is performed in mice, canines, and non-human primates. However, swine models are an alternative large animal model for cancer research with similarity to human size, genetics, and physiology. Additionally, tumorigenesis pathways are similar between human and pigs in that similar driver mutations are required for transformation. Due to their larger size, the development of orthotopic tumors is easier than in smaller rodent models; additionally, porcine models can be harnessed for testing of new interventional devices and radiological/surgical approaches as well. Taken together, swine are a feasible option for preclinical therapeutic and device testing. The goals of this resource are to provide a broad overview on regulatory processes required for new therapeutics and devices for use in the clinic, cross-species differences in oncological therapeutic responses, as well as to provide an overview of swine oncology models that have been developed that could be used for preclinical testing to fulfill regulatory requirements.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 240
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Antibiotics and Artificial Intelligence: Clinical Considerations on a Rapidly Evolving Landscape
    Giacobbe, Daniele Roberto
    Guastavino, Sabrina
    Marelli, Cristina
    Murgia, Ylenia
    Mora, Sara
    Signori, Alessio
    Rosso, Nicola
    Giacomini, Mauro
    Campi, Cristina
    Piana, Michele
    Bassetti, Matteo
    INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND THERAPY, 2025, 14 (03) : 493 - 500
  • [32] The Evolving Landscape of Genetic Carrier Screening: Clinical Considerations and Challenges
    Buckley, Lauren E. E.
    Hopkins, Maeve K. K.
    Kuller, Jeffrey A. A.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2023, 78 (08) : 483 - 489
  • [33] Evolving challenges to model human diseases for translational research
    Amanda P. Beck
    David K. Meyerholz
    Cell and Tissue Research, 2020, 380 : 305 - 311
  • [34] Evolving challenges to model human diseases for translational research
    Beck, Amanda P.
    Meyerholz, David K.
    CELL AND TISSUE RESEARCH, 2020, 380 (02) : 305 - 311
  • [35] Translational research: the changing landscape of drug discovery
    Fishburn, C. Simone
    DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2013, 18 (9-10) : 487 - 494
  • [36] Swine model for translational research of invasive intracranial monitoring
    Van Gompel, Jamie J.
    Bower, Mark R.
    Worrell, Gregory A.
    Stead, Matt
    Meier, Thomas R.
    Goerss, Stephan J.
    Chang, Su-Youne
    Kim, Inyoung
    Meyer, Fredric B.
    Marsh, W. Richard
    Marsh, Michael P.
    Lee, Kendall H.
    EPILEPSIA, 2011, 52 (06) : E49 - E53
  • [37] Evolving drug regulatory landscape in China: A clinical pharmacology perspective
    Tang, Weifeng
    Huang, Ying
    Zhou, Diansong
    Huang, Yao
    Chen, Yingxue
    Ren, Song
    Li, Yan
    Wu, Shengqian
    Zhao, Xiaoying
    Song, Xuyang
    Wang, Haidong
    Jin, Yuwen
    Yu, Hongtao
    Zhang, Li
    Li, Yunfei
    Boulton, David
    Shen, Kevin
    CTS-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2021, 14 (04): : 1222 - 1230
  • [38] Regulatory, Translational, and Operational Considerations for the Incorporation of Biomarkers in Drug Development
    Hatcher, Heather
    Stankeviciute, Simona
    Learn, Chris
    Qu, Angela X.
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2025,
  • [39] Industrial Applications of Hemp Fiber in Europe and Evolving Regulatory Landscape
    Cortes, Jeronimo Gonzalez
    Ryu, Byeong Ryeol
    Pauli, Christopher
    Barroso, Luis Royano
    Park, Sang-Hyuck
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL FIBERS, 2024, 21 (01)
  • [40] Bioethical Considerations in Translational Research: Primate Stroke
    Sughrue, Michael E.
    Mocco, J.
    Mack, Willam J.
    Ducruet, Andrew F.
    Komotar, Ricardo J.
    Fischbach, Ruth L.
    Martin, Thomas E.
    Connolly, E. Sander, Jr.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2009, 9 (05): : 3 - 12