Septoplasty: under general or sedation anesthesia. Which is more efficacious?

被引:0
|
作者
Hayrettin Daşkaya
Haşmet Yazıcı
Sedat Doğan
İlknur Haberal Can
机构
[1] Bezmialem Vakıf University,Anesthesia and Reanimation Clinic, Faculty of Medicine
[2] Balıkesir University,Ear Nose Throat Clinic, Faculty of Medicine
[3] Adıyaman University,Ear Nose Throat Clinic, Faculty of Medicine
[4] Bagcılar Medipol University,Ear Nose Throat Clinic, Faculty of Medicine
关键词
Septoplasty; Cost analysis; Sedation anesthesia; General anesthesia;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The objective of the study was to assess the more efficacious anesthesia method in septal surgery. The prospective study was conducted at an academic secondary referral center. A prospective chart review of 60 patients, between the ages of 16 and 65, who underwent septal surgery under general (GA) or sedation (SDA) anesthesia during 1-year period was done. Mean age of the patients was 44.30 ± 13.29. Patients were divided into two groups according to the anesthesia method: general (group 1) or sedation (group 2). Intraoperative hemodynamic variables, surgery time, intraoperative blood loss volume, length of hospital stay, postoperative vomiting and nausea, postoperative pain score according to the visual analog scale (VAS) and cost analysis of each method were compared. Thirty-six males and 24 females with a mean age 44.30 ± 13.29 were included to the study. Total operation time, operation time, intraoperative and postoperative bleeding volume, postoperative nausea and vomiting, duration of hospital stay after surgery, were better in group 2. Postoperative pain scores and patient satisfaction about surgery were not statistically different. Cost of anesthesia in group 1 per patient was $44.35 ± 10.81 and in group 2, $16.29 ± 11.88 (p < 0.01). Hospital stay after surgery was much longer in group 1 than group 2 (p < 0.01). Using SDA is better in many ways including cost-effectiveness than using GA for septoplasty operation.
引用
收藏
页码:2433 / 2436
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hemiballismus following general anesthesia. A case report
    Pilarczyk, M
    Buraczynska, K
    Sagan, M
    Tynecka, M
    Stelmasiak, Z
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, 24 (04) : 299 - 300
  • [22] Is isradipine more efficacious than clonidine in preventing hemodynamic responses related to epinephrine mucosal infiltration under general anesthesia?
    Yazbeck, P
    Roumoulian, C
    Hajj, C
    Jawish, D
    Cherfane, A
    Antakly, MC
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 85 (3A) : A111 - A111
  • [23] GENERAL-ANESTHESIA AND SEDATION
    WILSON, MC
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1983, 155 (05) : 144 - 144
  • [24] GENERAL-ANESTHESIA AND SEDATION
    WALTERS, H
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1983, 155 (04) : 111 - 111
  • [25] Regional Anesthesia. An Alternative to General Anesthesia in the Management of Neonatal Testicular Torsion
    Fernandez, Nicolas
    Santander, Jessica
    Ceballos, Cesar
    UROLOGY, 2020, 146 : 219 - 221
  • [26] Evaluation of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography under conscious sedation and general anesthesia
    Raymondos, K
    Panning, B
    Bachem, I
    Manns, MP
    Piepenbrock, S
    Meier, PN
    ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 34 (09) : 721 - 726
  • [27] More complications in anesthesia. Case studies - analysis - prevention
    Pierre, M. St.
    ANASTHESIOLOGIE & INTENSIVMEDIZIN, 2023, 64 : 107 - 107
  • [28] Success of Dental Treatments under Behavior Management, Sedation and General Anesthesia
    Blumer, Sigalit
    Costa, Liora
    Peretz, Benjamin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2019, 43 (06) : 413 - 416
  • [29] Success of Dental Treatments under Behavior Management, Sedation and General Anesthesia
    Blumer, Sigalit
    Costa, Liora
    Peretz, Benjamin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2017, 41 (04) : 308 - 311
  • [30] Suprapubic prostatectomy under nitrous oxid anesthesia.
    Wiener, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1904, 42 : 1278 - 1283