Septoplasty: under general or sedation anesthesia. Which is more efficacious?

被引:0
|
作者
Hayrettin Daşkaya
Haşmet Yazıcı
Sedat Doğan
İlknur Haberal Can
机构
[1] Bezmialem Vakıf University,Anesthesia and Reanimation Clinic, Faculty of Medicine
[2] Balıkesir University,Ear Nose Throat Clinic, Faculty of Medicine
[3] Adıyaman University,Ear Nose Throat Clinic, Faculty of Medicine
[4] Bagcılar Medipol University,Ear Nose Throat Clinic, Faculty of Medicine
关键词
Septoplasty; Cost analysis; Sedation anesthesia; General anesthesia;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The objective of the study was to assess the more efficacious anesthesia method in septal surgery. The prospective study was conducted at an academic secondary referral center. A prospective chart review of 60 patients, between the ages of 16 and 65, who underwent septal surgery under general (GA) or sedation (SDA) anesthesia during 1-year period was done. Mean age of the patients was 44.30 ± 13.29. Patients were divided into two groups according to the anesthesia method: general (group 1) or sedation (group 2). Intraoperative hemodynamic variables, surgery time, intraoperative blood loss volume, length of hospital stay, postoperative vomiting and nausea, postoperative pain score according to the visual analog scale (VAS) and cost analysis of each method were compared. Thirty-six males and 24 females with a mean age 44.30 ± 13.29 were included to the study. Total operation time, operation time, intraoperative and postoperative bleeding volume, postoperative nausea and vomiting, duration of hospital stay after surgery, were better in group 2. Postoperative pain scores and patient satisfaction about surgery were not statistically different. Cost of anesthesia in group 1 per patient was $44.35 ± 10.81 and in group 2, $16.29 ± 11.88 (p < 0.01). Hospital stay after surgery was much longer in group 1 than group 2 (p < 0.01). Using SDA is better in many ways including cost-effectiveness than using GA for septoplasty operation.
引用
收藏
页码:2433 / 2436
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Septoplasty: under general or sedation anesthesia. Which is more efficacious?
    Daskaya, Hayrettin
    Yazici, Hasmet
    Dogan, Sedat
    Can, Ilknur Haberal
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2014, 271 (09) : 2433 - 2436
  • [2] Sialendoscopy under conscious sedation versus general anesthesia. A comparative study
    Bawazeer, Naif
    Carvalho, Jean
    Djennaoui, Idir
    Charpiot, Anne
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 39 (06) : 754 - 758
  • [3] General surgical anesthesia.
    Mellish, EJ
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1903, 41 : 1465 - 1470
  • [4] Is ERCP under general anesthesia more complicated compared to ERCP under conscious sedation?
    Meier, PN
    Raymondos, K
    Bachem, I
    Panning, B
    Manns, MP
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 51 (04) : AB252 - AB252
  • [5] Remifentanil consumption in septoplasty surgery under general anesthesia
    Al-Mustafa, Mahmoud M.
    Al Oweidi, Abdelkarim S.
    Al-Zaben, Khaled R.
    Qudaisat, Ibraheem Y.
    Abu-Halaweh, Sami A.
    Al-Ghanem, Subhi M.
    Massad, Islam M.
    Samarah, Walid K.
    Al-Shaer, Reem A.
    Ismail, Said I.
    SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 38 (02) : 170 - 175
  • [6] General surgical anesthesia.
    Mellish, EJ
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1903, 41 : 1398 - 1403
  • [7] Outcomes of pediatric dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia.
    Schafer, TE
    Sellers, C
    Adair, S
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : A482 - A482
  • [8] Ethyl chloride in general anesthesia.
    Bodge, AM
    BOSTON MEDICAL AND SURGICAL JOURNAL, 1909, 160 : 234 - 235
  • [9] Clinical outcomes for nursing caries treated under general anesthesia.
    Berkowitz, RJ
    Moss, ME
    Milavec, T
    Billings, RJ
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1996, 75 : 3107 - 3107
  • [10] EVOKED RESPONSE IN GENERAL ANESTHESIA.
    Magatani, Kazushige
    Uchiyama, Akihiko
    Yanokuchi, Akira
    Narumi, Jun
    Ohe, Yoko
    Iwabuchi, Kumi
    Suma, Kozo
    Transactions of the Institute of Electronics and Communication Engineers of Japan. Section E, 1983, E66 (04): : 252 - 253