Response to O’Connell et al. (2020): There are multiple ways to adapt taxonomy to conservation goals

被引：0

作者：

Frank E. Rheindt

Shane T. Ahyong

Valter M. Azevedo-Santos

Markus Bertling

Patrice Bouchard

Neal Evenhuis

Mark Harvey

Mohammad Irham

Frank-T. Krell

Thomas Pape

A. Townsend Peterson

Dewi M. Prawiradilaga

Richard Pyle

Pamela Rasmussen

Francisco Welter-Schultes

Kevin Winker

机构：

[1] National University of Singapore,Department of Biological Sciences

[2] IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) Asian Songbird Trade Specialist Group,School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences

[3] International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature,Steering Committee

[4] Australian Museum Research Institute,Agriculture and Agri

[5] Australian Museum,Food Canada

[6] University of New South Wales,Division of Zoology, Research Center for Biology

[7] World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS),Department of Zoology

[8] New South Wales Fisheries Threatened Species Scientific Committee,Biodiversity Institute

[9] São Paulo State University – UNESP,undefined

[10] Geomuseum der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität,undefined

[11] Canadian National Collection of Insects,undefined

[12] Arachnids and Nematodes,undefined

[13] Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum,undefined

[14] Western Australian Museum,undefined

[15] Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI),undefined

[16] Denver Museum of Nature & Science,undefined

[17] Natural History Museum of Denmark,undefined

[18] University of Kansas,undefined

[19] International Union of Biological Sciences Working Group on Taxonomy,undefined

[20] Global Team for the Catalogue of Life,undefined

[21] Michigan State University Museum,undefined

[22] North American Classification Committee of the American Ornithological Society,undefined

[23] University of Göttingen,undefined

[24] University of Alaska Museum,undefined

来源：

Biodiversity and Conservation | 2021年 / 30卷

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

引用

页码：249 / 251

页数：2

共 50 条

[31] Challenges in Columbia River fisheries conservation: a response to Duda et al.
Hand, Brian K.
Flint, Courtney G.
Frissell, Chris A.
Muhlfeld, Clint C.
Devlin, Shawn P.
Kennedy, Brian P.
Crabtree, Robert L.
McKee, W. Arthur
Luikart, Gordon
Stanford, Jack A.
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 17 (01) : 11 - 13
[32] Clarifying compassionate conservation with hypotheticals: response to Wallach et al. 2018
Rohwer, Yasha
Marris, Emma
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2019, 33 (04) : 781 - 783
[33] Prioritizing Pacific salmon stocks for conservation: Response to Allendorf et al.
Wainwright, TC
Waples, RS
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1998, 12 (05) : 1144 - 1147
[34] Science denialism and compassionate conservation: response to Wallach et al. 2018
Driscoll, Don A.
Watson, Maggie J.
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2019, 33 (04) : 777 - 780
[35] Monitoring should not be a barrier to conservation success: a response to Sanders et al.
Stephenson, P. J.
ORYX, 2021, 55 (05) : 656 - 656
[36] A systematic and critical response to Pendrous et al. (2020) replication study
Ruiz, Francisco J.
Luciano, Carmen
Sierra, Marco A.
JOURNAL OF CONTEXTUAL BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2020, 17 : 39 - 45
[37] A heartfelt response to Zimprich et al. (2020), and Ainley et al. (2020)'s commentaries: Acknowledging issues with the HCT would benefit interoception research
Corneille, Olivier
Desmedt, Olivier
Zamariola, Giorgia
Luminet, Olivier
Maurage, Pierre
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 152
[38] Are Patagonia grasslands being overgrazed? A response to Marino et al. (2020)
Oliva, Gabriel
Paredes, Paula
Ferrante, Daniela
Cepeda, Carla
Rabinovich, Jorge
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2020, 57 (12) : 2399 - 2405
[39] Psychological distress as a unique concept: A response to Molgora et al. (2020)
Laporte, Genevieve
Aita, Marilyn
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2021, 278 : 13 - 14
[40] Contextualizing discourses of climate delay: a response to Lamb et al. (2020)
Pflieger, Geraldine
De Pryck, Kari
GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 6

← 1 2 3 4 5 →