Benefit of anatomical-functional image fusion in the diagnostic work-up of neuroendocrine neoplasms

被引:0
|
作者
Anna Christina Pfannenberg
Susanne Martina Eschmann
Marius Horger
Regina Lamberts
Reinhard Vonthein
Claus D. Claussen
Roland Bares
机构
[1] Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen,Department of Diagnostic Radiology
[2] Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen,Department of Nuclear Medicine
[3] Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen,Department of Gastroenterology
[4] Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen,Department of Medical Biometry
来源
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | 2003年 / 30卷
关键词
Neuroendocrine neoplasms; Image fusion; Anatomic-functional imaging;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate anatomical-functional image fusion using the new technology of combined transmission and emission tomography (SPET/CT) in patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NET). Fifty-four patients with known or suspected NET prospectively underwent both tumour scintigraphy with 111In-octreotide (n=43) or 123I-MIBG (n=11) and contrast-enhanced high-end spiral CT. Scintigraphy was performed using a gamma camera (Millennium VG & Hawkeye, GE) with an integrated X-ray tube for combined transmission and emission tomography. SPET and high-end CT were interpreted blinded with regard to localisation and classification of lesions. Analysis of fused images (SPET/CT) was done on a lesion-by-lesion basis, followed by re-evaluation of SPET and high-end CT by consensus. The standard of reference for confirming the presence or absence of malignancy was either histopathology or clinical and imaging follow-up data. A total of 120 lesions were identified by CT and/or scintigraphy. This group included four patients with negative SPET but eight liver lesions on CT that were proven to be metastases. We excluded from the analysis two patients with no evidence of tumour on either modality, two lesions that lacked comparison with the standard of reference and two patients, each with two lesions, who were lost to follow-up. In 56 of the 114 evaluated lesions (49%), the results of SPET and CT were concordant; all lesions were interpreted as malignant. In 58 of 114 lesions (51%), consensus reading of fused images changed the image interpretation of 39 CT scans and 19 SPET studies: 31 lesions previously interpreted as equivocal (n=10) or benign (n=21) were re-classified as malignant and 27 lesions previously interpreted as equivocal (n=19) or malignant (n=8) were re-evaluated as benign. The highest accuracy (99%) in classifying NET lesions was achieved by combined analysis of SPET/CT ("hawkeye") and high-end CT. The specificity of SPET/CT was significantly higher than that of CT alone (P=0.0026) and slightly higher than that of SPET alone, but the accuracy of SPET/CT was inferior to that of side-by-side analysis of SPET and high-end CT (P=0.013) or visual correlation of SPET/CT and high-end CT (P<0.0001). Therapy was changed in 14 of 50 patients (28%) owing to the results of image fusion: in five patients tumour could be excluded, three patients were spared unnecessary surgery because of additional lesions indicating systemic tumour spread, in four patients the surgical approach was changed owing to precise tumour localisation and minimising of the surgical field, and in two patients medical and radiopeptide therapy was changed. Anatomical-functional image fusion allows for improved localisation and characterisation of NET with resultant alteration of the treatment approach in a substantial proportion of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:835 / 843
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Significance of a Single-Time-Point Somatostatin Receptor SPECT/Multiphase CT Protocol in the Diagnostic Work-up of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
    Ruf, Juri
    von Wedel, Friederike
    Furth, Christian
    Denecke, Timm
    Stelter, Lars
    Steffen, Ingo G.
    Schuette, Kerstin
    Arend, Joerg
    Ulrich, Gerhard
    Klose, Silke
    Bornschein, Jan
    Apostolova, Ivalya
    Amthauer, Holger
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 57 (02) : 180 - 185
  • [22] Diagnostic work-up of arterial hypertension
    Scholze, J.
    KARDIOLOGE, 2007, 1 (03): : 197 - 207
  • [23] DIAGNOSTIC WORK-UP OF CHEST DISEASE
    JONES, DP
    SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1980, 60 (04) : 743 - 755
  • [24] Diagnostic work-up of pleural effusions
    Froudarakis, Marios E.
    RESPIRATION, 2008, 75 (01) : 4 - 13
  • [25] Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Critical Analysis of Diagnostic Work-up and Operative Approach
    Ethun, C. G.
    Postlewait, L. M.
    Baptiste, G. G.
    Le, N.
    McInnis, M. R.
    Cardona, K.
    Russell, M. C.
    Kooby, D. A.
    Staley, C. A.
    Maithel, S. K.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 : S97 - S97
  • [26] Osteoporosis: prevention and diagnostic work-up
    Theodorou, DJ
    Theodorou, SJ
    Sartoris, DJ
    HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2002, 63 (07): : 396 - 400
  • [27] DIAGNOSTIC WORK-UP OF HYPERPROLACTINEMIC DISORDERS
    ADASHI, EY
    KATZ, E
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1988, 2 (04) : 339 - 357
  • [28] Diagnostic work-up of cardiac amyloidosis
    Onsea, Kevin
    Wisanto, Erika
    Van Lier, Dirk
    Van de Werf, Frans
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2010, 65 (04) : 487 - 488
  • [29] Diagnostic work-up in steroid myopathy
    Marco Alessandro Minetto
    Valentina D’Angelo
    Emanuela Arvat
    Santosh Kesari
    Endocrine, 2018, 60 : 219 - 223
  • [30] URTICARIA DIAGNOSTIC WORK-UP AND MANAGEMENT
    HEGEDUS, SI
    SCHORR, WF
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 1972, 52 (05) : 132 - &