How to Remedy Non-optimal Seismic Data by Seismic Processing

被引:0
|
作者
J. Fertig
M. Thomas
R. Thomas
机构
[1] Institute of Geophysics,
[2] Technical University Clausthal,undefined
[3] Arnold-Sommerfeld-Str. 1,undefined
[4] D-38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld,undefined
[5] Germany.,undefined
来源
关键词
Key words: Wavelet processing, suppression of coherent noise.;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
—Seismic data processing mostly takes into account the statistics inherent in the data to improve the data quality. Since some years the deterministic approach for processing shows many advantages. This approach takes into account e.g., the source signature, with the knowledge of its amplitude and phase behavior. The transformation of the signal into an optimized form is called wavelet processing. By this step an optimal input for deconvolution can be produced, which needs a minimum- delay signal to function well. The interpreter needs a signal which gives the optimum resolution, which is accomplished by the zero-phase transformation of the input signal. The combination of different input sources such as Vibroseis and Dynamite requires a phase adoption. All these procedures can be implemented via Two-Sided-Recursive (TSR-) filters. Spectral balancing can be accomplished very effectively in time domain after a minimum delay transform of the input signals. The DEKORP data suffer from a low signal/noise ratio, so that special methods for the suppression of coherent noise trains were developed. This can be done by subtractive coherency filtering. Multiple seismic reflections also can be suppressed by this method very effectively. All processing procedures developed during recent years are now fully integrated in commercial software operated by the processing center in Clausthal.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 370
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Seismic interferometry vs. static corrections in seismic data processing
    Caicedo J.
    Almanza O.
    Montes L.
    [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021, 14 (6)
  • [32] EFFICIENCY ALGORITHM OF SEISMIC RAY TOMOGRAPHY IN PROCESSING EXTENSIVE SEISMIC DATA
    Troinich, K.
    Vyzhva, S.
    [J]. VISNYK OF TARAS SHEVCHENKO NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF KYIV-GEOLOGY, 2014, (66): : 77 - 82
  • [33] AUTOMATED DISPLAY AND PROCESSING FOR SEISMIC DATA
    BIBBO, JA
    ETTER, DM
    BREDING, DR
    [J]. TWENTY-THIRD ASILOMAR CONFERENCE ON SIGNALS, SYSTEMS & COMPUTERS, VOLS 1 AND 2: CONFERENCE RECORD, 1989, : 758 - 762
  • [34] A SURVEY OF SEISMIC DATA PROCESSING DEVELOPMENT
    HOFER, H
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 1969, 34 (06) : 996 - &
  • [35] SEISMIC DATA-PROCESSING AND INTERPRETATION
    BORTFELD, R
    [J]. ERDOL & KOHLE ERDGAS PETROCHEMIE, 1975, 28 (08): : 369 - 369
  • [36] Seismic processing in the inverse data space
    Berkhout, A. J.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2006, 71 (04) : A29 - A33
  • [37] A reversible transform for seismic data processing
    Burnett, William A.
    Ferguson, Robert J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2011, 8 (03) : 477 - 486
  • [38] AN ALGORITHM FOR PROCESSING SEISMIC EXPLORATION DATA
    HUANG, GY
    XU, WT
    FU, GH
    QIU, ZF
    YANG, BZ
    [J]. ACTA GEOPHYSICA SINICA, 1985, 28 (01): : 74 - 84
  • [39] INFORMATION THEORETIC PROCESSING OF SEISMIC DATA
    INGUVA, R
    SCHICK, LH
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1981, 8 (12) : 1199 - 1202
  • [40] MULTICHANNEL SEISMIC DATA-PROCESSING
    SHISHIDO, M
    [J]. NEC RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 1982, (65): : 48 - 53