How to Remedy Non-optimal Seismic Data by Seismic Processing

被引:0
|
作者
J. Fertig
M. Thomas
R. Thomas
机构
[1] Institute of Geophysics,
[2] Technical University Clausthal,undefined
[3] Arnold-Sommerfeld-Str. 1,undefined
[4] D-38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld,undefined
[5] Germany.,undefined
来源
关键词
Key words: Wavelet processing, suppression of coherent noise.;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
—Seismic data processing mostly takes into account the statistics inherent in the data to improve the data quality. Since some years the deterministic approach for processing shows many advantages. This approach takes into account e.g., the source signature, with the knowledge of its amplitude and phase behavior. The transformation of the signal into an optimized form is called wavelet processing. By this step an optimal input for deconvolution can be produced, which needs a minimum- delay signal to function well. The interpreter needs a signal which gives the optimum resolution, which is accomplished by the zero-phase transformation of the input signal. The combination of different input sources such as Vibroseis and Dynamite requires a phase adoption. All these procedures can be implemented via Two-Sided-Recursive (TSR-) filters. Spectral balancing can be accomplished very effectively in time domain after a minimum delay transform of the input signals. The DEKORP data suffer from a low signal/noise ratio, so that special methods for the suppression of coherent noise trains were developed. This can be done by subtractive coherency filtering. Multiple seismic reflections also can be suppressed by this method very effectively. All processing procedures developed during recent years are now fully integrated in commercial software operated by the processing center in Clausthal.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 370
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How to remedy non-optimal seismic data by seismic processing
    Fertig, J
    Thomas, M
    Thomas, R
    [J]. PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 1999, 156 (1-2) : 345 - 370
  • [2] How geophysicists' intuition helps seismic data processing
    Gholamy, Afshin
    Kreinovich, Vladik
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL FUZZY SYSTEMS ASSOCIATION AND THE EUROPEAN SOCIETY FOR FUZZY LOGIC AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 89 : 749 - 756
  • [3] The application of optimal control theory to processing seismic exploration data
    Qiu, ZF
    [J]. DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS AND CONTROL THEORY, 1996, 176 : 243 - 247
  • [4] Distributed Seismic Unix: a tool for seismic data processing
    Murillo, AE
    Bell, J
    [J]. CONCURRENCY-PRACTICE AND EXPERIENCE, 1999, 11 (04): : 169 - 187
  • [5] Seismic interferometriy in seismic whiling drilling data processing
    Huang, Weichuan
    Ge, Hongkui
    Wu, Hezhen
    Han, Laiju
    Wei, Maoan
    [J]. Shiyou Diqiu Wuli Kantan/Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2012, 47 (01): : 32 - 36
  • [6] Seismic data processing and interpretation on the loess plateau, Part 1: Seismic data processing
    Jiayu Jiang
    Shouxian Fu
    Jiuling Li
    [J]. Applied Geophysics, 2005, 2 (4) : 241 - 246
  • [7] PROCESSING OF SEISMIC PRECURSOR DATA
    KING, DW
    HUSEBYE, ES
    HADDON, RAW
    [J]. PHYSICS OF THE EARTH AND PLANETARY INTERIORS, 1976, 12 (2-3) : 128 - 134
  • [8] SPATIAL PROCESSING OF SEISMIC DATA
    MCCAMY, K
    STOFFA, PL
    CHUTE, JL
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 1977, 42 (07) : 1524 - 1524
  • [9] Seismic data processing dataware
    Yakovlev, A
    Razin, A
    [J]. NEFTYANOE KHOZYAISTVO, 2005, (05): : 91 - 92
  • [10] WAVELET PROCESSING OF SEISMIC DATA
    TANER, MT
    JEPSON, AE
    ODOHERTY, RF
    RAO, MK
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 1979, 27 (03) : 674 - 675