A combined approach to assess the impacts of Ecological Focus Areas on regional structural development and agricultural land use

被引:6
|
作者
Amanda Sahrbacher
Jordan Hristov
Mark V. Brady
机构
[1] Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO),Department of Structural Development of Farms and Rural Areas
[2] Lund University,Centre for Environmental and Climate Research (CEC)
[3] SLU and Centre for Environmental and Climate Research (CEC),Department of Economics
关键词
Common Agricultural Policy (CAP); EFA measures; Biodiversity; Ecosystem services; Stakeholder interactions; Agent-based modelling (ABM); Q18 (Agricultural Policy-Food policy); Q57 (Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services-Biodiversity Conservation-Bioeconomics-Industrial Ecology); C63 (Computational Techniques-Simulation Modeling);
D O I
10.1007/s41130-017-0051-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The 2013 reform of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) introduced compulsory ‘greening’ measures with the goal to mitigate environmental degradation caused by intensive agriculture. This paper aims to investigate how the implementation of the Ecological Focus Areas (EFA) obligation will affect regional agricultural development, the economic performance of farms and land use (including choices of EFA measures) in two representative EU regions. The research approach combines agent-based modelling (ABM) with stakeholder interactions to evaluate how farmers are likely to adapt to the new policy framework and the implications for their behaviour of the different components of the EFA obligation. Our results show that structural impacts of EFA measures are minor in both regions. The most preferred alternatives (fallow land in Sweden and catch crops in Germany) are income preserving for farmers rather than being effective for improving the environment. However, general concerns by farmers for biodiversity and the potential benefits for developing sustainable agriculture were revealed during the stakeholder workshops. We conclude that the large flexibility in choice of measures, watering down of the EFA regulations, implementation at the farm scale and lack of spatial targeting will all but eliminate any potential environmental benefits of the greening measures and subsequently, undermine farmers’ and citizens’ confidence in the CAP and its makers.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 144
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Conflicts between agricultural and ecological functions and their driving mechanisms in agroforestry ecotone areas from the perspective of land use functions
    Li, Sinan
    Zhu, Congmou
    Lin, Yue
    Dong, Baiyu
    Chen, Binjie
    Si, Bo
    Li, Yongjun
    Deng, Xiaodong
    Gan, Muye
    Zhang, Jing
    Wang, Ke
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 317
  • [32] An agent-based approach to modeling impacts of agricultural policy on land use, biodiversity and ecosystem services
    Mark Brady
    Christoph Sahrbacher
    Konrad Kellermann
    Kathrin Happe
    Landscape Ecology, 2012, 27 : 1363 - 1381
  • [33] The land use impacts of forestry and agricultural systems relative to natural vegetation; a fundamental energy dissipation approach
    Freer-Smith, Peter
    Muys, Bart
    Farrelly, Niall
    Drossler, Lars
    Minotta, Gianfranco
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 850
  • [34] An agent-based approach to modeling impacts of agricultural policy on land use, biodiversity and ecosystem services
    Brady, Mark
    Sahrbacher, Christoph
    Kellermann, Konrad
    Happe, Kathrin
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2012, 27 (09) : 1363 - 1381
  • [35] Regional impacts of agricultural land use history on forest vegetation and soils: Comparing primary and post-agricultural forests in Northern New Jersey
    Kelly, Jay F.
    Ray, Jessica
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 549
  • [36] A social-ecological approach to land-use conflict to inform regional and conservation planning and management
    Azadeh Karimi
    Marc Hockings
    Landscape Ecology, 2018, 33 : 691 - 710
  • [37] Spatial differentiation of indicators presenting selected barriers in the productivity of agricultural areas: A regional approach to setting land consolidation priorities
    Janus, Jaroslaw
    Taszakowski, Jaroslaw
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 93 : 718 - 729
  • [38] A social-ecological approach to land-use conflict to inform regional and conservation planning and management
    Karimi, Azadeh
    Hockings, Marc
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2018, 33 (05) : 691 - 710
  • [39] The impacts of land use and land cover change on biophysical processes in West Africa using a regional climate model experimental approach
    Achugbu, Ifeanyi Chukwudi
    Laux, Patrick
    Olufayo, Ayo Akinlabi
    Balogun, Ifeoluwa Adebowale
    Dudhia, Jimy
    Arnault, Joel
    Gbode, Imoleayo E.
    Naabil, Edward
    Kunstmann, Harald
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2023, 43 (04) : 1731 - 1755
  • [40] Analyzing sustainable development in Chinese cities: A focus on land use efficiency in production-living-ecological aspects
    Leng, Ao
    Wang, Kan
    Bai, Jianjun
    Gu, Na
    Feng, Ruitao
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 448