Combining genetic non-invasive sampling with spatially explicit capture-recapture models for density estimation of a patchily distributed small mammal

被引:0
|
作者
Helena Sabino-Marques
Clara Mendes Ferreira
Joana Paupério
Pedro Costa
Soraia Barbosa
Cláudia Encarnação
Russell Alpizar-Jara
Paulo Célio Alves
Jeremy B. Searle
António Mira
Pedro Beja
Ricardo Pita
机构
[1] Universidade de Évora,CIBIO/InBio
[2] Universidade de Évora,UE—Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Pólo de Évora
[3] Universidade do Porto,Unidade de Biologia da Conservação, Departamento de Biologia
[4] Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto,CIBIO/InBio—Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos
[5] Cornell University,Departamento de Biologia
[6] Universidade de Évora,Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
[7] University of Montana,CIMA—Centro de Investigação em Matemática e Aplicações, IIFA, Departamento de Matemática, Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia
[8] Universidade de Lisboa,Wildlife Biology Program, Department of Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences
来源
关键词
Cabrera vole; SECR model; Population biology; Population size estimates; Fragmented habitats; Faecal DNA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Estimating the size of animal populations is essential for understanding the demography and conservation status of species. Genetic Non-Invasive Sampling (gNIS) combined with Spatially Explicit Capture-Recapture (SECR) modelling may provide a practical tool to obtain such estimates. Here, we evaluate for the first time the potential and limitations of this approach to estimate population densities for small mammals inhabiting patchily distributed habitats, focusing on the endemic Iberian Cabrera vole (Microtus cabrerae). Using 11 highly polymorphic microsatellites and two sex-linked introns, we compared population estimates in November/December 2011 based on live-trapping and gNIS and assessed the impact of distinct consensus criteria to differentiate unique genotypes. Live-trapping over 21 days captured 31 individuals, while gNIS over 5 days recorded 65–69 individuals. SECR models indicated that individual detectability was positively affected by live-trapping capture success on the previous occasion, while for gNIS, it was mainly affected by genotyping success rates and patch size. Live-trapping produced the lowest density estimates (mean ± SE) of 16.6 ± 3.2 individuals per hectare of suitable habitat (ind/ha). Estimates based on gNIS were higher and varied slightly between 25.2 ± 4.0 and 28.8 ± 4.5 ind/ha depending on assuming one or two genotyping errors, respectively, when differentiating individual genetic profiles. Results suggest that live-trapping underestimated the vole population, while the larger number of individuals detected through gNIS allowed better estimates with lower field effort. Overall, we suggest that gNIS combined with SECR models provides an effective tool to estimate small mammal population densities in fragmented habitats.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [31] SPATIALLY EXPLICIT CAPTURE-RECAPTURE BASED ASSESSMENT FOR ESTIMATION OF POPULATION AND DENSITY OF AN ENDEMIC HIMALAYAN STREAM FROG (AMOLOPS FORMOSUS): FIELD STUDY FROM CHURDHAR WILDLIFE SANCTUARY, INDIA
    Chaudhary, Saurav
    Lyngdoh, Salvador
    JOURNAL OF HERPETOLOGY, 2024, 58 (02) : 109 - 121
  • [32] Non-Invasive Molecular Survey of Sarcoptic Mange in Wildlife: Diagnostic Performance in Wolf Faecal Samples Evaluated by Multi-Event Capture-Recapture Models
    Rousseau, Julieta
    Nakamura, Monia
    Rio-Maior, Helena
    Alvares, Francisco
    Choquet, Remi
    Madeira de Carvalho, Luis
    Godinho, Raquel
    Santos, Nuno
    PATHOGENS, 2021, 10 (02): : 1 - 15
  • [33] Non-invasive genetic population density estimation of mountain hares (Lepus timidus) in the Alps: systematic or opportunistic sampling?
    Rehnus, Maik
    Bollmann, Kurt
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 62 (06) : 737 - 747
  • [34] Non-invasive genetic population density estimation of mountain hares (Lepus timidus) in the Alps: systematic or opportunistic sampling?
    Maik Rehnus
    Kurt Bollmann
    European Journal of Wildlife Research, 2016, 62 : 737 - 747